Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Roulston (2010)
Considering quality in qualitative interviewingQualitative Research, 10
Banu Ozkazanc-Pan (2012)
Publishing Without Betrayal: Critical Scholarship Meets Mainstream JournalsCultural Anthropology eJournal
D. Fryer, Paul Duckett, R. Pratt (2004)
Critical community psychology: What, why and how?, 38
Dave Hill (2003)
Global neo-liberalism, the deformation of education and resistance.
S. Aronowitz (2000)
The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning.
Stephanie Reich, M. Riemer, Isaac Prilleltensky, M. Montero (2007)
International community psychology : history and theories
Z. Bauman (1991)
Modernity and the Holocaust
Henry Giroux, S. Giroux (2004)
Take back higher education : race, youth, and the crisis of democracy in the post-Civil Rights Era
N. Rose (1990)
Governing The Soul
I. Reid, M. Weber, H. Gerth, C. Mills (1947)
Essays in Sociology., 21
S. Milgram (1975)
Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View
Lorraine Code (2006)
Women Knowing/Knowing Women: Critical-Creative Interventions in the Politics of Knowledge
K. Danziger (1990)
Constructing the subject: Preface
Sheila Slaughter, G. Rhoades (2009)
Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to answer the question what is good research from the perspective of critical researchers working in the discipline of psychology.Designmethodologyapproach The authors first look at what it means to be good, then what it means to be critical and then interlink these two as a means of providing a context to understand why there appears to be so little critical research around. Findings The authors have put together a narrative that they hope is readable but that still pulls on the different ways each of them have approached the topic of defining good research and thinking about critical research.Originalityvalue The authors have personally witnessed the disappearanceing of critical activists, antipsychiatry activists, disability rights activists, trades unionists, critical scholars and put forward a reason among others as to why there is so little good critical research, which is that the status quo is implacably ferocious in its efforts to close it down wherever it occurs. Indeed, if the status quo is not doing its damnedest to close down the research you are doing, you can be reasonably sure it is not good critical research.
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 19, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.