Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Diewert (1978)
Hick's Aggregation Theorem and the Existence of a Real Value Added FunctionHistoy of Economic Thought Chapters, 2
D. Caves, L. Christensen, W. Diewert (1982)
THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITYEconometrica, 50
Daniel Trefler (2002)
The Case of the Missing Trade and Other MysteriesThe American Economic Review, 85
X. Li
Technological change, factor endowments and China's provincial agricultural trade – a neoclassical framework
(1991)
Increasing Returns and Economic Geography
M. Arellano, O. Bover (1995)
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components modelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
C. Hsiao (1989)
Analysis of Panel Data
J. Harrigan (1996)
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical ModelInternational Trade
G. Cheng
China's agriculture under the WTO framework
E.E. Leamer
Wage effects of a US – Mexican free trade agreement
C. Shuai, G. Cheng, J. Zhang
The estimation of China's agricultural competitiveness
W. Leontief
Domestic production and foreign trade: the American capital position re‐examined
F. Windmeijer (2000)
A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Two-Step GMM EstimatorsEconometrics eJournal
Arnaud Costinot (2009)
An Elementary Theory of Comparative AdvantageNBER Working Paper Series
Paul Krugman
American Economic Association Scale Economies , Product Differentiation , and the Pattern of Trade
U. Kohli (1978)
A gross national product function and the derived demand for imports and supply of exportsCanadian Journal of Economics, 11
A. Dixit, V. Norman (1980)
Theory of International Trade: SCALE ECONOMIES AND IMPERFECT COMPETITION
A. Dixit, V.D. Norman
Theory of International Trade
D. McFadden (1978)
Cost, Revenue, and Profit FunctionsHistoy of Economic Thought Chapters, 1
D. Acemoglu, Pol Antràs, E. Helpman (2007)
Contracts and Technology AdoptionThe American Economic Review, 97
S. Nickell (1981)
Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed EffectsEconometrica, 49
R. Blundell, Stephen Bond (1998)
Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models
P. Antras, E. Helpman
Global sourcing
F. Windmeijer
A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two‐step GMM estimators
Stephen Bond (2002)
Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practicePortuguese Economic Journal, 1
K. Anderson
Changing Comparative Advantage in China: Effects on Food, Feed and Fibre Markets
X. Kang
Study on mechanism of the structural adjustment of agricultural production in China
A. Woodland (1983)
International trade and resource allocation
D. Caves, L. Christensen, W. Diewert (1982)
MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS*The Economic Journal, 92
P. Krugman, A. Venables (1993)
Integration, Specialization, and the Adjustment
M. Gopinath, P. Kennedy (2000)
Agricultural Trade and Productivity Growth: A State-level AnalysisAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82
W. Chen
Comparative Advantage and the Internationalization of China's Agriculture
X. Kong
The Rise and Beyond – An Analysis on the Process and Mechanism in China's Rural Reform
P. Krugman (1981)
Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from TradeJournal of Political Economy, 89
W. Diewert (1980)
Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital
(2003)
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
G. Cheng
China's agricultural exports: the growth, structure and contribution
G. Cheng
China's agricultural exports: competitive advantage and key issues
C. Hulten (1991)
The Measurement of Capital
X. Yang, Y. Zhang
New Classical Economics and Inframarginal Analysis
J. Lin (1992)
Rural Reforms and Agricultural Growth in China.The American Economic Review, 82
C. Carter, Funing Zhong (1991)
Will Market Prices Enhance Chinese Agriculture?: A Test of Regional Comparative AdvantageWestern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16
P. Braunerhjelm, B. Borgman (2004)
Geographical Concentration, Entrepreneurship and Regional Growth: Evidence from Regional Data in Sweden, 1975-99Regional Studies, 38
M. Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991)
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment EquationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
H. Hotelling (1932)
Edgeworth's Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply FunctionsJournal of Political Economy, 40
R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, Zhongyang Zhang (1994)
Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized CountriesThe American Economic Review, 84
P. Krugman
Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade
H. Ju (2005)
An Analysis about Trade Deficit's Influential Mechanism on International Trade of China's Agricultural ProductsThe International Trade Journal
B. Felderer, Stefan Homburg (1987)
New Classical Economics
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explain the determination of China's agricultural foreign trade pattern since the World Trade Organization (WTO) accession. Design/methodology/approach – The neoclassical trade theory indicates that differences in both technology levels and factor endowments can explain the international trade pattern. In terms of a neoclassical framework based on the restricted profit function, this paper employs the province‐level panel data to investigate whether China's agricultural foreign trade pattern is consistent with the neoclassical explanation. Findings – The findings indicate that China's agricultural foreign trade pattern is evidently characterized by regional specific features. In the eastern region, agricultural foreign trade pattern is jointly determined by differences in technology levels and factor endowments. Agricultural foreign trade patterns are driven in the central and western regions by land and capital endowments, respectively. The findings also imply that the utilization of comparative advantage in China's agriculture needs to be exploited further. Originality/value – As far as the author knows, this paper is the first to apply the neoclassical framework based on the restricted profit function and employ the province‐level panel data to investigate the determination of China's agricultural foreign trade pattern.
China Agricultural Economic Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 27, 2012
Keywords: China; National economy; Agriculture; Foreign trade; Technology; Comparative advantage; Agricultural foreign trade; Restricted profit function
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.