Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Subsidiary autonomy and knowledge transfer

Subsidiary autonomy and knowledge transfer This paper aims to explore the effect of subsidiary autonomy on knowledge transfers during captive offshoring to emerging markets.Design/methodology/approachFive longitudinal cases of captive R&D and manufacturing offshoring to emerging markets.FindingsThe propositions entail the dual effect of operational subsidiary autonomy on primary knowledge transfer and reverse knowledge transfer. For newly established subsidiaries, operational subsidiary autonomy has a mainly negative effect on primary knowledge transfer and a mainly positive effect on reverse knowledge transfer and local collaboration activities increase this effect. Strategic subsidiary autonomy is mainly negative for primary and reverse knowledge transfer.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations concerning the applied exploratory case study approach suggest that further research should test the identified relationships using surveys, after the initial pilot study.Practical implicationsA gradual increase of operational subsidiary autonomy as the subsidiary capability level increases is beneficial to ensure primary knowledge transfer. Allowing subsidiaries to collaborate locally within the confines of their mandates benefits reverse knowledge transfer.Originality/valueThis paper extends the secondary knowledge transfer concept to include knowledge flows with local collaboration partners, not only other subsidiaries and clarifies the distinction between operational and strategic autonomy concerning local collaboration. A subsidiary asserts operational autonomy when its collaboration with local partners relates to its existing mandate. A subsidiary asserts strategic autonomy when it collaborates with local partners beyond this mandate. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing Emerald Publishing

Subsidiary autonomy and knowledge transfer

Download PDF
21 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/subsidiary-autonomy-and-knowledge-transfer-n9LMfa5s7Q
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2398-5364
DOI
10.1108/jgoss-04-2018-0016
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the effect of subsidiary autonomy on knowledge transfers during captive offshoring to emerging markets.Design/methodology/approachFive longitudinal cases of captive R&D and manufacturing offshoring to emerging markets.FindingsThe propositions entail the dual effect of operational subsidiary autonomy on primary knowledge transfer and reverse knowledge transfer. For newly established subsidiaries, operational subsidiary autonomy has a mainly negative effect on primary knowledge transfer and a mainly positive effect on reverse knowledge transfer and local collaboration activities increase this effect. Strategic subsidiary autonomy is mainly negative for primary and reverse knowledge transfer.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations concerning the applied exploratory case study approach suggest that further research should test the identified relationships using surveys, after the initial pilot study.Practical implicationsA gradual increase of operational subsidiary autonomy as the subsidiary capability level increases is beneficial to ensure primary knowledge transfer. Allowing subsidiaries to collaborate locally within the confines of their mandates benefits reverse knowledge transfer.Originality/valueThis paper extends the secondary knowledge transfer concept to include knowledge flows with local collaboration partners, not only other subsidiaries and clarifies the distinction between operational and strategic autonomy concerning local collaboration. A subsidiary asserts operational autonomy when its collaboration with local partners relates to its existing mandate. A subsidiary asserts strategic autonomy when it collaborates with local partners beyond this mandate.

Journal

Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 18, 2020

Keywords: Qualitative; Manufacturing; Capability; R&D; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge transfer; Offshoring; Subsidiary performance; Reverse innovation; Reverse knowledge transfer; Subsidiary autonomy

References

  • The relationship development aspect of production transfer
    Aaboen, L.; Fredriksson, A.
  • An international learning typology: strategies and outcomes for internationalizing firms
    Åkerman, N.
  • International opportunity realization in firm internationalization: non-linear effects of market-specific knowledge and internationalization knowledge
    Åkerman, N.
  • Knowledge-acquisition strategies and the effects on market knowledge – profiling the internationalizing firm
    Åkerman, N.
  • Learning from foreign subsidiaries: an empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers
    Ambos, T.C.; Ambos, B.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.
  • What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries?
    Ambos, T.C.; Andersson, U.; Birkinshaw, J.
  • Innovation and control in the multinational firm: a comparison of political and contingency approaches
    Ambos, B.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.
  • In the right place at the right time! the influence of knowledge governance tools on knowledge transfer and utilization in MNEs
    Andersson, U.; Buckley, P.J.; Dellestrand, H.
  • Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes
    Argote, L.; McEvily, B.; Reagans, R.
  • Internationalization of R&D in China and India: conventional wisdom versus reality
    Asakawa, K.; Som, A.
  • Managing innovation in the transnational corporation
    Bartlett, C.A.; Doz, Y.; Hedlund, G.
  • Networks and inter-organizational learning: a critical review
    Beeby, M.; Booth, C.
  • The congruence of entrepreneurship and India’s excellence in information technology
    Bhattacharjee, S.; Chakrabarti, D.
  • Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies
    Birkinshaw, J.; Hood, N.
  • The art of knowledge transfer: secondary and reverse transfer in China's telecommunications manufacturing industry
    Buckley, P.; Clegg, J.; Tan, H.
  • Offshore-sourcing strategies and the puzzle of productivity: a micro-level analysis
    Capolupo, R.; Amendolagine, V.; Ferri, G.
  • Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation
    Cohen, W.M.; Levinthal, D.A.
  • Centers of excellence: management within multinational corporations
    Coughlan, T.; Bernstein, G.
  • The next wave of globalization: relocating service provision to India
    Dossani, R.; Kenney, M.
  • Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research
    Dubois, A.; Gadde, L.-E.
  • Systematic combining”—a decade later
    Dubois, A.; Gadde, L.-E.
  • Dynamic capabilities and knowledge management: an integrative role for learning?
    Easterby-Smith, M.; Prieto, I.; Esgueva, A.
  • MNE microfoundations and routines for building a legitimate and sustainable position in emerging markets
    Elg, U.; Ghauri, P.N.; Child, J.; Collinson, S.
  • The new practice of global product development
    Eppinger, S.D.; Chitkara, A.R.
  • Managing international operations: configuration of production network for SMEs
    Errasti, A.; Rudberg, M.; Corti, D.
  • Managing evolving global production networks
    Galavan, R.; Murray, J.; Markides, C.
  • Making the most of foreign factories
    Ferdows, K.
  • POM forum: transfer of changing production know how
    Ferdows, K.
  • How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities
    Ferraris, A.; Santoro, G.; Dezi, L.
  • Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context
    Foss, N.J.; Pedersen, T.
  • Technology transfer as a part of the business – inter-organizational transfer strategies based on experiences of aircraft production
    Fredriksson, A.; Malm, A.; Skov Madsen, E.
  • The exploration phase of replication strategies: the role of autonomous action for reverse knowledge flows
    Friesl, M.; Larty, J.
  • Reverse knowledge acquisition in emerging market MNEs: the experiences of Huawei and ZTE
    Fu, X.; Sun, Z.; Ghauri, P.N.
  • The impact of increases in subsidiary autonomy and network relationships on performance
    Gammelgaard, J.; McDonald, F.; Stephan, A.; Tüselmann, H.; Dörrenbächer, C.
  • Interunit communication in multinational corporations
    Ghoshal, S.; Korine, H.; Szulanski, G.
  • Decision-making autonomy in UK international equity joint ventures
    Glaister, K.W.; Husan, R.; Buckley, P.J.
  • Adapting manufacturing processes for international transfer
    Grant, E.B.; Gregory, M.J.
  • Resource sharing among SBUs: strategic antecedents and administrative implications
    Gupta, A.K.; Govindarajan, V.
  • Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations
    Gupta, A.K.; Govindarajan, V.
  • Knowledge flows within multinational corporations
    Gupta, A.K.; Govindarajan, V.
  • How transfer of R&D to emerging markets nurtures global innovation performance
    Harryson, S.J.; Søberg, P.V.
  • Effective knowledge transfer between the headquarters and a subsidiary in a MNC: the need for heeding capacity
    Ishihara, H.; Zolkiewski, J.
  • Subsidiary autonomy and performance in Japanese multinationals in Europe
    Kawai, N.; Strange, R.
  • Achieving subsidiary integration in international innovation by managerial ’tools
    Keupp, M.M.; Palmié, M.; Gassmann, O.
  • Retrieving and transferring embodied data: implications for the management of interdependence within organizations
    King, A.
  • Building effective R&D capabilities abroad
    Kuemmerle, W.
  • The changing geography and ownership of value creation: evidence from mobile telecommunications
    Larsen, M.M.; Seppälä, T.; Ali-Yrkkö, J.
  • Bridging capability gaps in technology transfers within related offsets
    Malm, A.M.; Fredriksson, A.; Johansen, K.
  • A production transfer procedure based on risk management principles
    Mogos, M.F.; Fredriksson, A.; Alfnes, E.
  • Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications
    Monteiro, L.F.; Arvidsson, N.; Birkinshaw, J.
  • Competing in (and out of) transition economies
    Mutlu, C.C.; Zhan, W.; Peng, M.W.; Lin, Z.J.
  • Accessing offshoring advantages: what and how to offshore
    Mykhaylenko, A.; Motika, Á.; Waehrens, B.V.; Slepniov, D.
  • The impact of distance on headquarters’ network management capabilities
    Mykhaylenko, A.; Waehrens, B.V.; Slepniov, D.
  • Reverse knowledge transfer in emerging market multinationals: the Indian context
    Nair, S.R.; Demirbag, M.; Mellahi, K.
  • Exploring the paradox of competence-creating subsidiaries: balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs
    Narula, R.
  • Offshoring of R&D: looking abroad to improve innovation performance
    Nieto, M.J.; Rodriguez, A.
  • The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation
    Nieto, M.J.; Santamaría, L.
  • Differentiated fit and shared values - alternatives for managing headquarters subsidiary relations
    Nohria, N.; Ghoshal, S.
  • The concept of ‘Ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation
    Nonaka, I.; Konno, N.
  • Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs
    Noorderhaven, N.; Harzing, A.-W.
  • Pull the right levers: creating internationally ‘useful’ subsidiary competence by organizational architecture
    Palmié, M.; Keupp, M.M.; Gassmann, O.
  • Subsidiary roles and reverse knowledge transfer: an investigation of the effects of coordination mechanisms
    Rabbiosi, L.
  • Parent company benefits from reverse knowledge transfer: the role of the liability of newness in MNEs
    Rabbiosi, L.; Santangelo, G.D.
  • Towards a theory of competitive progression: evidence from high-tech manufacturing
    Rosenzweig, E.D.; Roth, A.V.
  • Orchestration of globally distributed knowledge within MNC network: a collaborative-oriented view
    Sajadirad, S.; Lassen, A.H.; Søberg, P.V.
  • The uncertain relevance of newness: organizational learning and knowledge flows
    Schulz, M.
  • Those who know, do. Those who understand, teach. Disseminative capability and knowledge transfer in the automotive industry
    Schulze, A.; Brojerdi, G.; von Krogh, G.
  • Strategy for privacy assurance in offshoring arrangements
    Sharma, C.; Kaushik, A.
  • Industrial influences on R&D transfer to China
    Søberg, P.V.
  • The transfer and creation of knowledge within foreign invested R&D in emerging markets
    Søberg, P.V.
  • Activity specific knowledge characteristics in the internationalization process
    Søberg, P.V.
  • Captive R&D offshoring - the case of newly established foreign-invested R&D units in emerging markets
    Søberg, P.V.
  • Institutional influences on R&D collaboration in China
    Søberg, P.V.
  • Technical knowledge creation: enabling tacit knowledge use
    Søberg, P.V.; Chaudhuri, A.
  • Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm
    Szulanski, G.
  • The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness
    Szulanski, G.
  • Determinants of coordination modes within organizations
    Van de Ven, A.H.; Delbecq, A.L.; Koenig, R. Jr
  • The replication of expansive production knowledge: the role of templates and principles
    Wæhrens, B.V.; Cheng, Y.; Madsen, E.S.
  • Offshoring practices of Danish and Swedish SMEs: effects on operations configuration
    Waehrens, B.V.; Slepniov, D.; Johansen, J.
  • Centralization and autonomy: back to the future
    Young, S.; Tavares, A.T.
  • Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension
    Zahra, S.A.; George, G.
  • A typology of reverse innovation
    Zedtwitz, M.V.; Corsi, S.; Søberg, P.V.; Frega, R.