Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace

Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace One of the strongest and most important outcomes of trait social courage is employee voice, but researchers have only studied this relationship with unidimensional conceptualizations of voice. The purpose of this paper is to apply Van Dyne et al.’s (2003) three-dimensional conceptualization of voice, which also distinguishes three dimensions of silence, to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship of social courage with voice and silence. The authors also test for the moderating effect of three contextual influences: top management attitudes toward voice and silence, supervisor attitudes toward voice and silence, as well as communication opportunities.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a four-timepoint survey with each measurement occasion separated by one week. A total of 134 participants completed all four timepoints.FindingsThe results support that social courage positively relates to prosocial voice and silence, whereas it negatively relates to defensive voice and silence as well as acquiescent voice and silence. In other words, social courage positively relates to beneficial voice and silence as well as negatively relates to detrimental voice and silence. The results also failed to support any moderating effects, suggesting that the relationships of social courage are very resilient to outside forces.Practical implicationsThese findings both test prior results and discover new relationships of social courage, which can further stress the importance of courage. The authors also draw direct connections between the influence of social courage on the surrounding workplace environment – as well as the influences of the environment on social courage. While the current paper provides insights into social courage, it also directs future researchers toward new insights of their own.Originality/valueCourage is an emergent research topic within organizations. While many authors have assumed that courage is important to work, the current paper is among the few to empirically support this notion. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance Emerald Publishing

Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace

Download PDF
21 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/social-courage-fosters-both-voice-and-silence-in-the-workplace-DdlqPM30Lv
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2051-6614
DOI
10.1108/joepp-04-2019-0034
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

One of the strongest and most important outcomes of trait social courage is employee voice, but researchers have only studied this relationship with unidimensional conceptualizations of voice. The purpose of this paper is to apply Van Dyne et al.’s (2003) three-dimensional conceptualization of voice, which also distinguishes three dimensions of silence, to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship of social courage with voice and silence. The authors also test for the moderating effect of three contextual influences: top management attitudes toward voice and silence, supervisor attitudes toward voice and silence, as well as communication opportunities.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a four-timepoint survey with each measurement occasion separated by one week. A total of 134 participants completed all four timepoints.FindingsThe results support that social courage positively relates to prosocial voice and silence, whereas it negatively relates to defensive voice and silence as well as acquiescent voice and silence. In other words, social courage positively relates to beneficial voice and silence as well as negatively relates to detrimental voice and silence. The results also failed to support any moderating effects, suggesting that the relationships of social courage are very resilient to outside forces.Practical implicationsThese findings both test prior results and discover new relationships of social courage, which can further stress the importance of courage. The authors also draw direct connections between the influence of social courage on the surrounding workplace environment – as well as the influences of the environment on social courage. While the current paper provides insights into social courage, it also directs future researchers toward new insights of their own.Originality/valueCourage is an emergent research topic within organizations. While many authors have assumed that courage is important to work, the current paper is among the few to empirically support this notion.

Journal

Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance – Emerald Publishing

Published: Mar 31, 2020

Keywords: Motivation; Organization citizenship behaviour; Voice; Courage; Prosocial behaviours; Social courage

References

  • Bullying at work
    Adams, A.; Beasley, J.; Rayner, C.
  • The theory of planned behavior
    Ajzen, I.
  • Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation
    Bacharach, S.B.
  • Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: a qualitative analysis with recommendations
    Becker, T.E.
  • Resisting organizational-level corruption: an interview with Sherron Watkins
    Beenen, G.; Pinto, J.
  • Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison
    Berry, C.M.; Carpenter, N.C.; Barratt, C.L.
  • Voice and silence in organizations: historical review and current conceptualizations
    Brinsfield, C.T.; Edwards, M.S.; Greenberg, J.; Greenberg, J.; Edwards, M.S.
  • Speaking up vs. being heard: the disagreement around and outcomes of employee voice
    Burris, E.; Detert, J.; Romney, A.
  • Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them
    Busse, C.; Kach, A.P.; Wagner, S.M.
  • A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior
    Carpenter, N.C.; Berry, C.M.; Houston, L.
  • Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing
    Casler, K.; Bickel, L.; Hackett, E.
  • Grit or honesty-humility? New insights into the moderating role of personality between the health impairment process and counterproductive work behavior
    Ceschi, A.; Sartori, R.; Dickert, S.; Costantini, A.
  • Toxic work environments: what helps and what hurts
    Chamberlain, L.J.; Hodson, R.
  • Voice behavior and work engagement: the moderating role of supervisor‐attributed motives
    Cheng, J.W.; Lu, K.M.; Chang, Y.Y.; Johnstone, S.
  • The impact of job insecurity on counterproductive work behaviors: the moderating role of honesty–humility personality trait
    Chirumbolo, A.
  • What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research
    Conway, J.M.; Lance, C.E.
  • Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior
    Crant, J.M.; Kim, T.Y.; Wang, J.
  • Workplace courage: review, synthesis, and future agenda for a complex construct
    Detert, J.R.; Bruno, E.A.
  • Reconceptualising employee silence: problems and prognosis
    Donaghey, J.; Cullinane, N.; Dundon, T.; Wilkinson, A.
  • The Mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality
    Donnellan, M.; Oswald, F.; Baird, B.; Lucas, R.
  • Approach and avoidance motivation
    Elliot, A.J.; Covington, M.V.
  • Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals
    Elliot, A.J.; Thrash, T.M.
  • ‘Yes men’, integrity, and the optimal design of incentive contracts
    Ewerhart, C.; Schmitz, P.W.
  • The brief approach/avoidance coping questionnaire: development and validation
    Finset, A.; Steine, S.; Haugli, L.; Steen, E.; Laerum, E.
  • Self-determination theory and work motivation
    Gagné, M.; Deci, E.L.
  • Moral distress and moral courage in everyday nursing practice
    Gallagher, A.
  • ‘I couldn’t wait to leave the toxic environment’: a mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution
    Gardner, S.K.
  • The courage to actively care
    Geller, E.S.; Geller, E.S.
  • The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
    Goldberg, L.R.
  • Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors
    Hannah, S.T.; Avolio, B.J.; Walumbwa, F.O.
  • Expressions of dissent in email: qualitative insights into uses and meanings of organizational dissent
    Hastings, S.O.; Payne, H.J.
  • Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants
    Hauser, D.J.; Schwarz, N.
  • Applying the approach/avoidance framework to understand the relationships between social courage, workplace outcomes, and well-being outcomes
    Howard, M.C.
  • Does the courage measure really measure courage? A theoretical and empirical evaluation
    Howard, M.C.; Alipour, K.K.
  • The left side of courage: three exploratory studies on the antecedents of social courage
    Howard, M.C.; Cogswell, J.E.
  • The creation of the Workplace Social Courage Scale (WSCS): an investigation of internal consistency, psychometric properties, validity, and utility
    Howard, M.C.; Farr, J.; Grandey, A.; Gutworth, M.
  • Laughing with the yes men: the politics of affirmation
    Hynes, M.; Sharpe, S.; Fagan, B.
  • Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work
    Kahn, W.A.
  • Suffering in silence: investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence
    Kiewitz, C.; Restubog, S.L.D.; Shoss, M.K.; Garcia, P.R.J.M.; Tang, R.L.
  • The dark cycle of work avoidance goals and disengagement: a cross-lagged analysis
    King, R.B.
  • Silenced by fear: the nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work
    Kish-Gephart, J.J.; Detert, J.R.; Treviño, L.K.; Edmondson, A.C.
  • The determinants of alternative forms of workplace voice: an integrative perspective
    Klaas, B.; Olson-Buchanan, J.; Ward, A.
  • Do I hear the whistle…? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates
    Knoll, M.; Van Dick, R.
  • Courage as identity work: accounts of workplace courage
    Koerner, M.M.
  • Moral courage: a virtue in need of development?
    Lachman, V.D.
  • Featured interview Sherron Watkins, former vice president for corporate development of Enron
    Lucas, N.; Koerwer, V.S.
  • Courage as a potential mediator between personality and coping
    Magnano, P.; Paolillo, A.; Platania, S.; Santisi, G.
  • Speaking more broadly: an examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors
    Maynes, T.D.; Podsakoff, P.M.
  • An exploratory study of employee silence: issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why
    Milliken, F.J.; Morrison, E.W.; Hewlin, P.F.
  • Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research
    Morrison, E.W.
  • Employee voice and silence
    Morrison, E.W.
  • Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior
    Nikolaou, I.; Vakola, M.; Bourantas, D.
  • Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis
    Podsakoff, N.P.; Whiting, S.W.; Podsakoff, P.M.; Blume, B.D.
  • Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P.
  • A theory of ‘yes men’
    Prendergast, C.
  • Distinctions between general and personal courage
    Pury, C.L.; Kowalski, R.M.; Spearman, J.
  • Is courage an accolade or a process? A fundamental question for courage research
    Pury, C.L.S.; Lopez, S.J.; Puty, C.; Lopez, S.
  • The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: the hidden costs of abusive supervision
    Rafferty, A.E.; Restubog, S.L.D.
  • Defining the features of courage: a search for meaning
    Rate, C.R.; Puty, C.; Lopez, S.
  • Implicit theories of courage
    Rate, C.R.; Clarke, J.A.; Lindsay, D.R.; Sternberg, R.J.
  • Relationships among power distance, collectivism, punishment, and acquiescent, defensive, or prosocial silence
    Rhee, J.; Dedahanov, A.; Lee, D.
  • Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress
    Roth, S.; Cohen, L.J.
  • Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
    Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L.
  • Ethical decision-making theory: an integrated approach
    Schwartz, M.S.
  • Moral courage in the workplace: moving to and from the desire and decision to act
    Sekerka, L.E.; Bagozzi, R.P.
  • Facing ethical challenges in the workplace: conceptualizing and measuring professional moral courage
    Sekerka, L.E.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Charnigo, R.
  • Fear and courage in aerial combat
    Shaffer, L.F.
  • Beyond pro-social rule breaking: an exploration of the relationship between pro-social rule breaking and prosocial organizational deviance
    Smith, L.D.
  • A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples
    Smith, S.M.; Roster, C.A.; Golden, L.L.; Albaum, G.S.
  • Methodological urban legends: the misuse of statistical control variables
    Spector, P.E.; Brannick, M.T.
  • Editor’s comments: construct clarity in theories of management and organization
    Suddaby, R.
  • Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda
    Tepper, B.J.
  • A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance
    Tett, R.P.; Burnett, D.D.
  • Courage in the workplace: the effects of organizational level and gender on the relationship between behavioral courage and job performance
    Tkachenko, O.; Quast, L.N.; Song, W.; Jang, S.
  • Ethical decision making in organizations: a person-situation interactionist model
    Trevino, L.K.
  • Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation
    Vakola, M.; Bouradas, D.
  • Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity
    Van Dyne, L.; LePine, J.A.
  • Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs
    Van Dyne, L.; Ang, S.; Botero, I.C.
  • How abusive supervisors influence employees’ voice and silence: the effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution
    Wang, R.; Jiang, J.
  • Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse
    Watkins, S.
  • Construct dimensionality of engagement and its relation with satisfaction
    Wefald, A.J.; Downey, R.G.
  • What constitutes a theoretical contribution?
    Whetten, D.A.
  • Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior
    Zellars, K.L.; Tepper, B.J.; Duffy, M.K.