Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Y. Dai, J. McCalley, N. Abi-Samra, V. Vittal (2001)
Annual Risk Assessment for Overload SecurityIEEE Power Engineering Review, 21
R. Billinton, R. Karki (1999)
Capacity reserve assessment using system well-being analysisIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14
G. Strbac, S. Ahmed, D. Kirschen, R. Allan (1998)
A method for computing the value of corrective securityIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13
Shangyou Hao, A. Papalexopoulos (1997)
Reactive power pricing and managementIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 12
D. Zhai, A. Breipohl, F. Lee, R. Adapa (1994)
The effect of load uncertainty on unit commitment riskIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9
H. Singh, A. Papalexopoulos (1999)
Competitive procurement of ancillary services by an independent system operatorIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14
N. Chowdhury, R. Billinton (1990)
Risk constrained economic load dispatch in interconnected generating systemsIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5
K. Lo, A. Hashim (2002)
Synthesis and scaling the risk index for generation levels
Vladimiro Miranda, L. Proença (1998)
Why risk analysis outperforms probabilistic choice as the effective decision support paradigm for power system planningIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13
R. Kaye, F. Wu, P. Varaiya (1995)
Pricing for system security [power tariffs]IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10
H. Gooi, D. Mendes, K. Bell, D. Kirschen (1999)
Optimal scheduling of spinning reserveIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14
M. Flynn, W. Sheridan, J. Dillon, M. O’Malley (2001)
Reliability and Reserve in Competitive Electricity Market SchedulingIEEE Power Engineering Review, 21
R. Billinton, R. Allan (1984)
Reliability evaluation of power systems
A system operator (SO) of a transmission network consistently aims to minimise operating costs whilst still maintaining a certain degree of system adequacy. One of the ways to achieve this is by minimising the level of spinning reserve (SR) in the system. In order to do so, the level of SR must be analysed. This study looks at quantifying the risk of inadequacy when the SR is varied. A study was done for a period of 24 h with 30 m intervals to determine the risk level at each period. The number of generators despatched, system power margin and the system sell price was all taken into account. Risk was then computed by factoring the probability of generation inadequacy and the cost of purchasing the imbalance from the balancing market.
COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 2004
Keywords: Systems analysis; Risk assessment; Power transmission systems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.