Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Retrieval performance of Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries in the field of “life science and biomedicine”

Retrieval performance of Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries in the field of “life... The purpose of this study is to assess the retrieval performance of three search engines, i.e. Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries using two important retrieval measures, i.e. precision and relative recall in the field of life science and biomedicine.Design/methodology/approachTop three search engines namely Google, Yahoo and Bing were selected on the basis of their ranking as per Alexa, an analytical tool that provides ranking of global websites. Furthermore, the scope of study was confined to those search engines having interface in English. Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science was used for the extraction of navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. Navigational queries (classified as one-word, two-word and three-word queries) were extracted from the keywords of the papers representing the top 100 contributing authors in the select field. Keywords were also checked for the duplication. Two important evaluation parameters, i.e. precision and relative recall were used to calculate the performance of search engines on the navigational queries.FindingsThe mean precision for Google scores high (2.30) followed by Yahoo (2.29) and Bing (1.68), while mean relative recall also scores high for Google (0.36) followed by Yahoo (0.33) and Bing (0.31) respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is of great help to the researchers and academia in determining the retrieval efficiency of Google, Yahoo and Bing in terms of navigational query execution in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study can help users to focus on various search processes and the query structuring and its execution across the select search engines for achieving desired result list in a professional search environment. The study can also act as a ready reference source for exploring navigational queries and how these queries can be managed in the context of information retrieval process. It will also help to showcase the retrieval efficiency of various search engines on the basis of subject diversity (life science and biomedicine) highlighting the same in terms of query intention.Originality/valueThough many studies have been conducted highlighting the retrieval efficiency of search engines the current work is the first of its kind to study the retrieval effectiveness of Google, Yahoo and Bing on navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study will help in understanding various methods and approaches to be adopted by the users for the navigational query execution across a professional search environment, i.e. “life science and biomedicine” http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Data Technologies and Applications Emerald Publishing

Retrieval performance of Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries in the field of “life science and biomedicine”

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/retrieval-performance-of-google-yahoo-and-bing-for-navigational-5CQF1ufWrs
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2514-9288
DOI
10.1108/dta-05-2019-0083
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the retrieval performance of three search engines, i.e. Google, Yahoo and Bing for navigational queries using two important retrieval measures, i.e. precision and relative recall in the field of life science and biomedicine.Design/methodology/approachTop three search engines namely Google, Yahoo and Bing were selected on the basis of their ranking as per Alexa, an analytical tool that provides ranking of global websites. Furthermore, the scope of study was confined to those search engines having interface in English. Clarivate Analytics' Web of Science was used for the extraction of navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. Navigational queries (classified as one-word, two-word and three-word queries) were extracted from the keywords of the papers representing the top 100 contributing authors in the select field. Keywords were also checked for the duplication. Two important evaluation parameters, i.e. precision and relative recall were used to calculate the performance of search engines on the navigational queries.FindingsThe mean precision for Google scores high (2.30) followed by Yahoo (2.29) and Bing (1.68), while mean relative recall also scores high for Google (0.36) followed by Yahoo (0.33) and Bing (0.31) respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThe study is of great help to the researchers and academia in determining the retrieval efficiency of Google, Yahoo and Bing in terms of navigational query execution in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study can help users to focus on various search processes and the query structuring and its execution across the select search engines for achieving desired result list in a professional search environment. The study can also act as a ready reference source for exploring navigational queries and how these queries can be managed in the context of information retrieval process. It will also help to showcase the retrieval efficiency of various search engines on the basis of subject diversity (life science and biomedicine) highlighting the same in terms of query intention.Originality/valueThough many studies have been conducted highlighting the retrieval efficiency of search engines the current work is the first of its kind to study the retrieval effectiveness of Google, Yahoo and Bing on navigational queries in the field of life science and biomedicine. The study will help in understanding various methods and approaches to be adopted by the users for the navigational query execution across a professional search environment, i.e. “life science and biomedicine”

Journal

Data Technologies and Applications – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 2, 2020

Keywords: Search engines; Precision; Recall; Relative recall; Retrieval effectiveness; Retrieval efficiency; Navigational Queries; Google; Yahoo; Bing

References

  • An overview of Web search evaluation methods
    Ali, R.; Beg, M.M.S.
  • Search engine effectiveness using query classification: a study
    Ali, S.; Gul, S.
  • Methods for measuring search engine performance over time
    Bar-Ilan, J.
  • Manipulating search engine algorithms: the case of Google
    Bar-Ilan, J.
  • The linguistic structure of English web-search queries
    Barr, C.; Jones, R.; Regelson, M.
  • Ranking, relevance judgment, and precision of information retrieval on children's queries: evaluation of Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Yahoo! Kids, and ask Kids
    Bilal, D.
  • The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine
    Brin, S.; Page, L.
  • A taxonomy of web search
    Broder, A.
  • Evaluating evaluation measure stability
    Buckley, C.; Voorhees, E.M.
  • Automatic performance evaluation of web search engines
    Can, F.; Nuray, R.; Sevdik, A.B.
  • Search engines for the world wide web: a comparative studyand evaluation methodology
    Chu, H.; Rosenthal, M.
  • Performance evaluation and comparison of the five most used search engines in retrieving web resources
    Deka, S.K.; Lahkar, N.
  • A comparative study of web search service performance
    Ding, W.; Marchionini, G.
  • Evaluation deutscher web-Suchwerkzeuge
    Dresel, R.; Ho¨rnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, N.; Sieber, W.
  • Is Google the answer? A study into usability of search engines
    Dudek, D.; Mastora, A.; Landoni, M.
  • An evaluation of how search engines respond to Greek language queries
    Efthimiadis, E.N.; Malevris, N.; Kousaridas, A.; Lepeniotou, A.; Loutas, N.
  • Drei von vier Deutschen im Netz—ein Ende des digitalen Grabens in Sicht?
    Eimeren, B.V.; Frees, B.
  • Evaluating search engines: a comparative study between international and Greek SE by Greek librarians
    Garoufallou, E.
  • Greek academic librarians' perceptions of the impact of Google on their role as information providers
    Garoufallou, E.; Balatsoukas, P.; Siatri, R.; Zafeiriou, G.; Asderi, S.; Ekizoglou, P.
  • Relevance rankings: pay for performance search engines in the hot seat
    Goh, D.H.; Ang, R.P.
  • Finding information on the World Wide Web: the retrieval effectiveness of search engines
    Gordon, M.; Pathak, P.
  • Deutsche Suchmaschinen im Vergleich: AltaVista.de, Fireball.de und Lycos.de
    Griesbaum, J.; Rittberger, M.; Bekavac, B.
  • Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
    Griesbaum, J.
  • Tauglichkeit von Suchmaschinen fu¨r deutschsprachige Anfragen
    Guggenheim, E.; Bar-Ilan, J.
  • Image search engine feature analysis
    Hassan, I.; Zhang, J.
  • The very large collection and web tracks
    Hawking, D.; Craswell, N.; Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.K.
  • Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of web queries
    Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.
  • Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the Web
    Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.
  • Query type classification for web document retrieval
    Kang, I.H.; Kim, G.
  • Web search engines evaluation based on features and end-user experience
    Kaur, M.; Bhatia, N.; Singh, S.
  • Accessibility of web search engines: towards a deeper understanding of barriers for people with disabilities
    Kerkmann, F.; Lewandowski, D.
  • Evaluating the searching capabilities of search engines and metasearch engines: a comparative study
    Kumar, B.T.S.; Pavithra, S.M.
  • Precision and relative recall of search engines: a comparative study of Google and Yahoo
    Kumar, B.T.S.; Prakash, J.N.
  • Information retrieval techniques for evaluating search engines: a critical overview
    Landoni, M.; Bell, S.
  • Web retrieval systems and the Greek language: do they have an understanding?
    Lazarinis, F.
  • First 20 precision among world wide web search services (search engines)
    Leighton, H.V.; Srivastava, J.
  • Query types and search topics of German web search engine users
    Lewandowski, D.
  • At the sharp end: problems with the use of web search engines to find results in foreign languages
    Lewandowski, D.
  • The retrieval effectiveness of web search engines: considering results descriptions
    Lewandowski, D.
  • The retrieval effectiveness of search engines on navigational queries
    Lewandowski, D.
  • Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of web search engines using a representative query sample
    Lewandowski, D.
  • A new method for automatic performance comparison of search engines
    Li, L.; Shang, Y.
  • Evaluation of web search for the information practitioner
    Macfarlane, A.
  • Evaluating the retrieval effectiveness of search engines using persian navigational queries
    Mahmoudi, M.; Badie, R.; Zahedi, M.S.; Azimzadeh, M.
  • Evaluating the suitability of Web search engines as proxies for knowledge discovery from the Web
    Martínez-Sanahuja, L.; Sánchez, D.
  • A comparative study on overlapping of search results in metasearch engines and their common underlying search engines
    Moghaddam, A.I.; Parirokh, M.
  • The evaluation of WWW search engines
    Oppenheim, C.; Morris, A.; McKnight, C.; Lowley, S.
  • Understanding science and technology information users through transaction log analysis
    Park, M.; Lee, T.S.
  • A comparative analysis of web image and textual queries
    Pu, H-T.
  • Search and email still top the list of most popular online activities
    Purcell, K.
  • Automatic performance evaluation of web search engines using judgments of metasearch engines
    Sadeghi, H.
  • Precision and recall of five search engines for retrieval of scholarly information in the field of biotechnology
    Shafi, S.M.; Rather, R.A.
  • Precision evaluation of search engines
    Shang, Y.; Li, L.
  • How Google may identify navigational queries and resources. SEO by the SEA
    Slawski, B.
  • Identification of ambiguous queries in web search
    Song, R.; Luo, Z.; Nie, J.Y.; Yu, Y.; Hon, H.W.
  • Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich, Teil 1: retrievaltest mit Known Item Searches
    Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.
  • Understanding and predicting personal navigation
    Teevan, J.; Liebling, D.J.; Geetha, G.R.
  • FOCAS - formal concept analysis and text similarity
    Tung-Tam, G.K.
  • A comparative study of Google and bing search engines in context of precision and relative recall parameter
    Usmani, T.A.; Pant, D.; Bhatt, A.K.
  • An exploration of users' needs for multilingual information retrieval and access
    Vassilakaki, E.; Garoufallou, E.; Johnson, F.; Hartley, R.J.; Garoufallou, E.; Hartley, R.J.; Gaitanou, P.
  • Users' information search behavior in a professional search environment: a methodological approach
    Vassilakaki, E.; Garoufallou, E.; Johnson, F.; Hartley, R.J.; Paltoglou, G.; Loizides, F.; Preben, H.
  • New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested
    Vaughan, L.
  • A comparative study of six search engines
    Ve´ronis, J.
  • Interactive query formulation
    Wacholder, N.
  • Different types of search queries
    Webber, A.
  • A cognitive evaluation of four online search engines for answering definitional questions posed by Physicians
    Yu, H.; Kaufman, D.
  • Search engines? responses to several search feature selections
    Zhang, J.; Fei, W.
  • A comparative analysis of the search feature effectiveness of the major English and Chinese search engines
    Zhang, J.; Fei, W.; Le, T.
  • Using a Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate Chinese search engines: a case study on Chinese search engines
    Zhu, Q.; Du, J.T.; Meng, F.; Wu, K.; Sun, X.