Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Higman, S. Pinfield (2015)
Research data management and openness: The role of data sharing in developing institutional policies and practicesProgram, 49
B. Mons, C. Neylon, Jan Velterop, M. Dumontier, Luiz Santos, Mark Wilkinson (2017)
Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science CloudInf. Serv. Use, 37
(2015)
Déluge des données de la recherche
Birgit Schmidt, J. Dierkes (2015)
New alliances for research and teaching support: establishing the Göttingen eResearch AllianceProgram, 49
E. Barsky, S. Adam, P. Farrar, M. Meredith-Lobay, M. Mitchell, J.-A. Naslund, C. Sylka (2017)
Research data management survey, UBC: humanities and social sciences
C. Tenopir, Danielle Pollock, Suzie Allard, Dane Hughes (2016)
Research data services in european and north american libraries: Current offerings and plans for the futureProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53
(2013)
See the LIBER survey on library-based data services
(2012)
Science as an open enterprise. Summary report
A. Aydinoğlu, Güleda Doğan, Zehra Taşkın (2017)
Research data management in Turkey: perceptions and practicesLibr. Hi Tech, 35
C. Ward, L. Freiman, Sarah Jones, L. Molloy, Kellie Snow (2011)
Making Sense: Talking Data Management with ResearchersInt. J. Digit. Curation, 6
J. Klump (2017)
Data as Social Capital and the Gift Culture in ResearchData Sci. J., 16
(2016)
Funding research data management and related infrastructures
J. Faundeen (2017)
Developing Criteria to Establish Trusted Digital RepositoriesData Sci. J., 16
Stacy Kowalczyk, K. Shankar (2011)
Data sharing in the sciencesAnnu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 45
(2017)
This is consistent with an ongoing data life cycle management project in Switzerland which puts a major focus on long-term preservation
G. Knight (2015)
Building a research data management service for the London school of hygiene & tropical medicineProgram, 49
B. Bauer, A. Ferus, J. Gorraiz, C. Gumpenberger, V. Gründhammer, N. Maly, J.M. Mühlegger, J.L. Preza, B. Sánchez Solís, N. Schmidt, C. Steineder (2015)
Researchers and their data: results of an Austrian survey
Pierre-Yves Burgi, Eliane Blumer, Basma Makhlouf-Shabou (2017)
Research data management in SwitzerlandIFLA Journal, 43
A. Whyte, J. Tedds (2011)
Making the Case for Research Data Management
C. Curdt, D. Hoffmeister (2015)
Research data management services for a multidisciplinary, collaborative research project: Design and implementation of the TR32DB project databaseProgram, 49
C. Tenopir, Elizabeth Dalton, Suzie Allard, M. Frame, Ivanka Pjesivac, B. Birch, Danielle Pollock, Kristina Dorsett (2015)
Changes in Data Sharing and Data Reuse Practices and Perceptions among Scientists WorldwidePLoS ONE, 10
C. Awre, J. Baxter, B. Clifford, Janette Colclough, Andrew Cox, Nick Dods, P. Drummond, Yvonne Fox, M. Gill, Kerry Gregory, A. Gurney, J. Harland, Masud Khokhar, D. Lowe, R. O'Beirne, Rachel Proudfoot, H. Schwamm, Andrew Smith, Eddy Verbaan, Liz Waller, L. Williamson, Martin Wolf, Matthew Zawadzki (2015)
Research Data Management as a “wicked problem”Library Review, 64
Andrew Asher, Kiyomi Deards, M. Esteva, M. Halbert, L. Jahnke, Christopher Jordan, Spencer Keralis, Sivakumar Kulasekaran, William Moen, Shannon Stark, T. Urban, David Walling (2013)
Research Data Management Principles, Practices, and Prospects
Graham Pryor, Sarah Jones, A. Whyte (2013)
Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good Practice
Andrew Cox, M. Kennan, L. Lyon, S. Pinfield (2017)
Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturityJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68
Peter Lund (2015)
Delivering Research Data Management Services: Fundamentals of Good PracticeElectron. Libr., 33
(2016)
Funding research data management and related infrastructures, Briefing Paper, Science Europe -Knowledge Exchange
Susan Reilly, W. Schallier, S. Schrimpf, Eefke Smit, Max Wilkinson (2011)
Report on integration of data and publications
(2015)
The ethical challenges of the sharing of scientific data
Joachim Schöpfel, C. Ferrant, F. André, Renaud Fabre (2016)
Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS)Interlending & Document Supply, 44
(2016)
Research data management in social sciences and humanities: A survey at the University of Lille 3 (France)
Caroline Martin, Colette Cadiou, Emmanuelle Jannès-Ober (2017)
Data Management: New Tools, New Organization, and New Skills in a French Research InstituteThe Liber Quarterly, 27
Direction Cnrs (2016)
Livre blanc — Une Science ouverte dans une République numérique
T. Weller, Amalia Monroe-Gulick (2014)
Understanding methodological and disciplinary differences in the data practices of academic researchersLibr. Hi Tech, 32
(2012)
Ten recommendations for libraries to get started with research data management, LIBER Association of European Research Libraries
C. Humphrey, K. Shearer, M. Whitehead (2016)
Towards a Collaborative National Research Data Management NetworkInternational Journal of Digital Curation, 11
S. Brown, R. Bruce, D. Kernohan (2015)
Directions for research data management in UK Universities
H. Krumholz, J. Waldstreicher (2016)
The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project--A Mechanism for Data Sharing.The New England journal of medicine, 375 5
At Sciences Po, she is affiliated to the Observatoire Sociologique du Changement laboratory (Sciences Po / CNRS). She is also an associate fellow at the Alimentation et
R. Curty, Kevin Crowston, A. Specht, Bruce Grant, Elizabeth Dalton (2017)
Attitudes and norms affecting scientists’ data reusePLoS ONE, 12
C. Thanos (2017)
Research Data Reusability: Conceptual Foundations, Barriers and Enabling TechnologiesPubl., 5
Mark Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J. Boiten, Luiz Santos, P. Bourne, J. Bouwman, A. Brookes, Tim Clark, M. Crosas, I. Dillo, Olivier Dumon, S. Edmunds, C. Evelo, R. Finkers, Alejandra González-Beltrán, A. Gray, Paul Groth, C. Goble, J. Grethe, J. Heringa, P. Hoen, R. Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, J. Kok, S. Lusher, M. Martone, Albert Mons, A. Packer, Bengt Persson, P. Rocca-Serra, M. Roos, Rene Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, E. Schultes, T. Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, M. Swertz, Mark Thompson, J. Lei, E. Mulligen, Jan Velterop, A. Waagmeester, P. Wittenburg, K. Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, B. Mons (2016)
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardshipScientific Data, 3
Elena Simukovic, Maxi Kindling, Peter Schirmbacher (2014)
Unveiling Research Data Stocks: A Case of Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin
Comité Ethique, Leduc Michèle (2015)
COMETS OPINION 2015-30 - THE ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF THE SHARING OF SCIENTIFIC DATA
The purpose of this paper is to present empirical evidence on the opinion and behaviour of French scientists (senior management level) regarding research data management (RDM).Design/methodology/approachThe results are part of a nationwide survey on scientific information and documentation with 432 directors of French public research laboratories conducted by the French Research Center CNRS in 2014.FindingsThe paper presents empirical results about data production (types), management (human resources, IT, funding, and standards), data sharing and related needs, and highlights significant disciplinary differences. Also, it appears that RDM and data sharing is not directly correlated with the commitment to open access. Regarding the FAIR data principles, the paper reveals that 68 per cent of all laboratory directors affirm that their data production and management is compliant with at least one of the FAIR principles. But only 26 per cent are compliant with at least three principles, and less than 7 per cent are compliant with all four FAIR criteria, with laboratories in nuclear physics, SSH and earth sciences and astronomy being in advance of other disciplines, especially concerning the findability and the availability of their data output. The paper concludes with comments about research data service development and recommendations for an institutional RDM policy.Originality/valueFor the first time, a nationwide survey was conducted with the senior research management level from all scientific disciplines. Surveys on RDM usually assess individual data behaviours, skills and needs. This survey is different insofar as it addresses institutional and collective data practice. The respondents did not report on their own data behaviours and attitudes but were asked to provide information about their laboratory. The response rate was high (>30 per cent), and the results provide good insight into the real support and uptake of RDM by senior research managers who provide both models (examples for good practice) and opinion leadership.
Data Technologies and Applications – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 22, 2018
Keywords: Data preservation; Open Science; Research data management; Data sharing; Data curation; FAIR principles
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.