Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Rice, G. Harris, Carol Lang, T. Chaplin (2008)
Sexual Preferences and Recidivism of Sex Offenders With Mental RetardationSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20
D. Boer, S. Tough, James Haaven (2004)
Assessment of Risk Manageability of Intellectually Disabled Sex OffendersJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
M. Delforterie, J. Berg, Betto Bolt, T. Hazel, Leam Craig, R. Didden (2019)
Comparing STATIC-99R and STABLE-2007 between persons with and without intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour
A. Phenix, D. Doren, L. Helmus, R.K. Hanson, D. Thornton (2008)
Coding rules for static-2002
S. Tough (2001)
Validation of two standard assessments (RRASOR, 1997; STATIC-99, 1999) on a sample of adult males who are intellectually disabled with significant cognitive deficits
Christian Baudin, T. Nilsson, J. Sturup, M. Wallinius, P. Andiné (2021)
A Static-99R Validation Study on Individuals With Mental Disorders: 5 to 20 Years of Fixed Follow-Up After Sexual OffensesFrontiers in Psychology, 12
R. Hanson, Chelsea Sheahan, Heather VanZuylen (2013)
STATIC-99 and RRASOR Predict Recidivism among Developmentally Delayed Sexual Offenders : A Cumulative Meta-Analysis
R. Archer, Jacqueline Buffington-Vollum, R. Stredny, R. Handel (2006)
A Survey of Psychological Test Use Patterns Among Forensic PsychologistsJournal of Personality Assessment, 87
(2014)
STATIC-99R scorehandleiding [static-99R scoring manual]
G. Sjöstedt, M. Grann (2002)
Risk Assessment: What is Being Predicted by Actuarial Prediction Instruments?International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1
J. Bolt, J. Berg, M. Delforterie, T. Hazel, H. Didden (2018)
Verschil moet er zijn? Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar risicofactoren voor recidive bij seksueel delinquenten met een licht verstandelijke beperking, 42
L. Helmus, D. Thornton, R. Hanson, K. Babchishin (2012)
Improving the Predictive Accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 With Older Sex OffendersSexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24
Karl Hanson, L. Helmus, A. Harris, Cathrine Pettersen, Shelley Price, Chelsea Sheahan (2015)
Assessing the Risk and Needs of Supervised Sexual OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 42
A. Phenix, Y. Fernandez, A.J.R. Harris, M. Helmus, R.K. Hanson, D. Thornton (2016a)
Static-99R coding rules revised — 2016
T. Neal, T. Grisso (2014)
Assessment Practices and Expert Judgment Methods in Forensic Psychology and PsychiatryCriminal Justice and Behavior, 41
(2012)
Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ : British Medical Journal, 345
(2004)
Recidivism follow-up of 81 sexual offenders with developmental delays from york Central hospital
M. Rice, G. Harris (2005)
Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and rLaw and Human Behavior, 29
D. Wilcox, A. Beech, Helena Markall, Janine Blacker (2009)
Actuarial risk assessment and recidivism in a sample of UK intellectually disabled sexual offendersJournal of Sexual Aggression, 15
J. Singh (2013)
Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: a methodological primer.Behavioral sciences & the law, 31 1
Demetra Andrews, J. Bonta (2010)
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice.Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16
C. Pouls, I. Jeandarme (2015)
Risk Assessment and Risk Management in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities: Are We There Yet?Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 8
H. Nijman, P. Muris, H. Merckelbach, T. Palmstierna, B. Wistedt (1999)
The staff observation aggression scale-revised (SOAS-R): ErratumJournal of Applied Physiology
J. Hounsome, R. Whittington, A. Brown, B. Greenhill, J. McGuire (2018)
The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 31
F Harrell, Kerry Lee, D. Mark (2005)
Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors
(2012)
Static-99R scores of 14 developmentally delayed sexual offenders from Vermont who were either recidivists or non-recidivists
G. Murrey, D. Briggs, C. Davis (1992)
Psychopathic Disordered, Mentally Ill, and Mentally Handicapped Sex Offenders: A Comparative StudyMedicine, Science and the Law, 32
Rachael Lofthouse, L. Golding, V. Totsika, R. Hastings, W. Lindsay (2017)
How effective are risk assessments/measures for predicting future aggressive behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical psychology review, 58
R. Hanson, Kelly Morton-Bourgon (2009)
The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.Psychological assessment, 21 1
L. Helmus, R. Hanson, Daniel Murrie, Carmen Zabarauckas (2021)
Field validity of Static-99R and STABLE-2007 with 4,433 men serving sentences for sexual offences in British Columbia: New findings and meta-analysis.Psychological assessment
Tijdschrift Voor Seksuologie [Journal of Sexology], 42
D.P. Boer, J. Haaven, F. Lambrick, W.R. Lindsay, K.R. McVilly, M.C.J. Sakdalan Frize (2013)
ARMIDILO-S: the assessment of risk and manageability of individuals with developmental and intellectual limitations who offend sexually
W. Lindsay, T. Hogue, John Taylor, L. Steptoe, P. Mooney, G. O'brien, S. Johnston, Anne Smith (2008)
Risk Assessment in Offenders With Intellectual DisabilityInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52
Statistics in Medicine, 15
L. Helmus, R. Hanson, D. Thornton, K. Babchishin, R. AndrewJ., Harris (2012)
Absolute Recidivism Rates Predicted By Static-99R and Static-2002R Sex Offender Risk Assessment Tools Vary Across SamplesCriminal Justice and Behavior, 39
Clinical Chemistry, 44
D. Boer, K. Mcvilly, Frank Lambrick (2007)
Contextualizing risk in the assessment of intellectually disabled individuals, 2
C. Garber (1998)
MedCalc Software for Statistics in Medicine. MedCalc Software, Broekstraat 52, 9030 Mariakerke, Belgium, $399.00.Clinical Chemistry, 44
Skye Stephens, Jennifer Newman, J. Cantor, M. Seto (2018)
The Static-99R predicts sexual and violent recidivism for individuals with low intellectual functioning*Journal of Sexual Aggression, 24
Rachael Lofthouse, W. Lindsay, V. Totsika, R. Hastings, D. Boer, James Haaven (2013)
Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 26 5
Tom Fawcett (2006)
An introduction to ROC analysisPattern Recognit. Lett., 27
C. Ducro, Thierry Pham (2006)
Evaluation of the SORAG and the Static-99 on Belgian Sex Offenders Committed to a Forensic FacilitySexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18
D. Thornton, R. Mann, Steve Webster, L. Blud, Rosie Travers, C. Friendship, M. Erikson (2003)
Distinguishing and Combining Risks for Sexual and Violent RecidivismAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989
H. Verbrugge, J. Goodman-Delahunty, M. Frize (2011)
Risk Assessment in Intellectually Disabled Offenders: Validation of the Suggested ID Supplement to the HCR-20International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10
(2013)
Calibration performance indicators of the static-99R: 2013 update
BMJ, 345
A. Phenix, L.M. Helmus, R.K. Hanson (2016b)
Static-99R & static-20002R evaluators' workbook
J. Camilleri, V. Quinsey (2011)
Appraising the risk of sexual and violent recidivism among intellectually disabled offendersPsychology, Crime & Law, 17
J. Singh, M. Grann, S. Fazel (2011)
A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants.Clinical psychology review, 31 3
Risk assessment studies involving recidivism in sex offenders with intellectual disabilities (SOIDs) continue to be scarce, limited and producing mixed results. This study aims (to test the ability ...) to test the ability of one such instrument (the Static-99R) to predict intramural sexual and violent incidents involving members of this group.Design/methodology/approachThe Static-99R was prospectively scored for 38 SOIDs. Occurrences of any violent or sexual incident and/or illegal sexual behaviour were recorded during a minimum period of six months. Predictive accuracy was analysed using several performance indicators.FindingsThe Static-99R significantly predicted sexual incidents (area under the curve = 0.70) but failed to predict violent and illegal sexual incidents. Regarding illegal sexual incidents, the instrument was better at detecting low-risk individuals than high-risk offenders.Originality/valueRisk assessment studies, both in offenders with and without an intellectual disability (ID), rarely use multiple accuracy estimates. The current study used both discrimination and calibration indicators to evaluate the ability of the Static-99R to detect low- and high-risk offenders.
Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 20, 2022
Keywords: Static-99; Static-99R; Risk assessment; Intellectual disability; Sex offender; Recidivism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.