Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Daly, Jay Dee (2006)
Greener Pastures: Faculty Turnover Intent in Urban Public UniversitiesThe Journal of Higher Education, 77
John Meyer, Natalie Allen (1991)
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitmentHuman Resource Management Review, 1
M. Riketta (2002)
Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: a meta‐analysisJournal of Organizational Behavior, 23
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
Laura Perna (2001)
Sex and Race Differences in Faculty Tenure and PromotionResearch in Higher Education, 42
J. Halbesleben (2010)
A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences.
Tierney W.G. (1996)
10.1037/t76451-000
Paul Spector (2006)
Method Variance in Organizational ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 9
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1976)
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
Randall Bowden, Lynn Gonzalez (2012)
The rise of contingent faculty: its impact on the professoriate and higher educationJournal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 4
U. Hallberg, W. Schaufeli (2006)
“Same Same” But Different?: Can Work Engagement Be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment?European Psychologist, 11
Maureen Ambrose, R. Cropanzano (2003)
A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: an examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 2
W. Tierney, E. Bensimon (1996)
Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe
R. O'neil, R. Chait (2002)
The Questions of Tenure, 88
Michael Christian, Adela Garza, J. Slaughter (2011)
WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCEPersonnel Psychology, 64
John Meyer, David Stanley, Lynne Herscovitch, Laryssa Topolnytsky (2002)
AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCESJournal of Vocational Behavior, 61
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
J. Hayton, D. Allen, Vida Scarpello (2004)
Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel AnalysisOrganizational Research Methods, 7
J. Colquitt, D. Conlon, M. Wesson, C. Porter, K. Ng (2001)
Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 3
Aaup (2001)
Policy Documents and Reports
Natalie Allen, John Meyer (1990)
The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organizationJournal of occupational psychology, 63
Yochi Cohen-Charash, Paul Spector (2001)
The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-AnalysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86
R. Cropanzano, Marie Mitchell (2005)
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary ReviewJournal of Management, 31
Journal of Applied Psychology, 98
J. Colquitt, Brent Scott, J. Rodell, David Long, Cindy Zapata, Donald Conlon, M. Wesson (2013)
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.The Journal of applied psychology, 98 2
W. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, Vicente González-Romá, A. Bakker (2002)
The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic ApproachJournal of Happiness Studies, 3
R. Cropanzano, Zinta Byrne (2000)
Workplace justice and the dilemma of organizational citizenship.
PurposeNotwithstanding the rise of contingent faculty, tenured and tenured track faculty continue to play vital roles in US higher education and the tenure decision is central to the lives of many academics. While the literature is replete with anecdotes about faculty complaining about the process to which they were subject, there has been surprisingly little empirical research on faculty perceptions of the clarity and fairness of the tenure process and the relationship of these perceptions to work outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to examine the motivational impact of these processes on faculty who are pre-tenure as well as those who had successfully navigated the tenure process.Design/methodology/approachSelf-reported survey data were collected from 410 full-time pre-tenured and tenured faculty at three universities in the Northeastern USA. Participants were assessed on their uncertainty and their perceptions of justice in the tenure process as well as their affective and continuance organizational commitment and work engagement. Data were subject to exploratory factor analysis, correlation, and hierarchical regression.FindingsThe results indicated that there was a lack of clarity with respect to both the criteria for tenure and the procedures by which institutions made tenure decisions. The results indicated no gender differences in the perception of clarity, but the results suggest women perceived the tenure process as being less just than men do. Perceived justice was positively related to both affective organizational commitment and work engagement with affective commitment fully mediating the relationship with there being no relationship between continuance commitment and perceived justice. These relations held for both tenured and later career faculty and pre-tenured and earlier career faculty.Research limitations/implicationsThe study extends understanding of the dimensionality of justice perceptions in higher education setting. The design was cross-sectional and data common was self-report.Practical implicationsThe results provide empirical support to anecdotes of faculty feeling that tenure processes often lack clarity and appear to be capricious and unfair. It provides evidence that the negative impact of a process being viewed as unfair may affect the dedication and effort that the faculty who are granted tenure and remain at their institutions for decades afterward. At a time, when higher education is resource challenged, it behooves both faculty and administrators to critically review their tenure processes against best practices.Originality/valueThis study adds to the limited empirical literature on the tenure process and does so from a motivational perspective.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 10, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.