Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Bugeja, Natalie Gallery (2006)
Is Older Goodwill Value Relevant?Capital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation
Jayne Godfrey, P. Koh (2008)
Goodwill Impairment as a Reflection of Investment OpportunitiesERN: Internal & External Contracting & Transaction Costs (Topic)
Journal of Insurance Regulation, 20
G. Iatridis, N. Joseph (2006)
Characteristics of UK Firms Related to Timing of Adoption of Statement of Standard Accounting Practice No. 20Public Choice & Political Economy eJournal
Suzanne Sevin, Richard Schroeder (2005)
Earnings management: evidence from SFAS No. 142 reportingManagerial Auditing Journal, 20
R. Watts (2003)
Conservatism in Accounting - Part I: Explanations and ImplicationsAuditing
Accounting Horizons, 17
Journal of Business Ethics, 57
Jieying Zhang (2008)
The Contracting Benefits of Accounting Conservatism to Lenders and BorrowersCorporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies eJournal
Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 36
K. Chalmers, Greg Clinch, Jayne Godfrey (2008)
Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards: Impact on the Value Relevance of Intangible AssetsFinancial Accounting eJournal
Journal of Applied Research in Accounting & Finance, 2
Kevin Li, A. Amel-Zadeh, G. Meeks (2010)
The Impairment of Purchased Goodwill: Effects on Market ValueFinancial Accounting
J. Hausman (1978)
Specification tests in econometricsApplied Econometrics, 38
G. Wines, R. Dagwell, C. Windsor (2007)
Implications of the IFRS goodwill accounting treatmentManagerial Auditing Journal, 22
S. Zeff (2002)
“Political” Lobbying on Proposed Standards: A Challenge to the IASBAccounting Horizons, 16
Peter Kennedy (1980)
A Guide to Econometrics
Changling Chen, M. Kohlbeck, Terry Warfield (2004)
Goodwill Valuation Effects of the Initial Adoption of SFAS 142SPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Paquita Davis-Friday, L. Eng, Chao-Shin Liu (2006)
The effects of the Asian crisis, corporate governance and accounting system on the valuation of book value and earningsThe International Journal of Accounting, 41
R. Jennings, John Robinson, R. Thompson, Linda Duvall (1996)
THE RELATION BETWEEN ACCOUNTING GOODWILL NUMBERS AND EQUITY VALUESJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23
James Ohlson (1995)
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*Contemporary Accounting Research, 11
Natalie Churyk (2005)
Reporting goodwill: are the new accounting standards consistent with market valuations?Journal of Business Research, 58
K. Li, Richard Sloan (2017)
Has goodwill accounting gone bad?Review of Accounting Studies, 22
Carla Hayn, P. Hughes (2006)
Leading Indicators of Goodwill ImpairmentJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 21
M. Bloom (2009)
Accounting for GoodwillApplied Accounting - Practitioner eJournal
K. Chalmers, Jayne Godfrey, John Webster (2011)
Does a Goodwill Impairment Regime Better Reflect the Underlying Economic Attributes of Goodwill?Financial Accounting eJournal
W. Beaver, Y. Ijiri (1976)
Theory Of Accounting Measurement
K. Ramanna (2007)
The Implications of Unverifiable Fair-Value Accounting: Evidence from the Political Economy of Goodwill AccountingCorporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law
Mariano González, J. Nave, David Toscano (2014)
Impact of IFRS: evidence from Spanish listed companiesInternational Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22
I. Zhang, Yong Zhang (2007)
Accounting Discretion and Purchase Price Allocation After AcquisitionsJournal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 32
Marc Massoud, Cecily Raiborn (2003)
Accounting for Goodwill: Are We Better Off?, 24
Anne Beatty, Joseph Weber (2006)
Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill ImpairmentsJournal of Accounting Research, 44
C. Cheng, Stephen Lin (2009)
When do firms revalue their assets upwards? Evidence from the UKInternational Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 17
Pascale Lapointe-Antunes, D. Cormier, M. Magnan (2009)
Value relevance and timeliness of transitional goodwill-impairment losses: Evidence from Canada ☆The International Journal of Accounting, 44
M. Hoogendoorn (2006)
International Accounting Regulation and IFRS Implementation in Europe and Beyond – Experiences with First-time Adoption in EuropeAccounting in Europe, 3
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45
Ernst & Young (2006)
IFRS i praksis 2006 – Udvalgte områder med fokus på presentation
C. Petersen, Thomas Plenborg (2010)
How Do Firms Implement Impairment Tests of GoodwillAbacus, 46
Zining Li, Pervin Shroff, Ramgopal Venkataraman, I. Zhang (2011)
Causes and consequences of goodwill impairment lossesReview of Accounting Studies, 16
Daniel Bens, Wendy Heltzer, Benjamin Segal (2011)
The Information Content of Goodwill Impairments and SFAS 142Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 26
H. Jarva (2009)
Do Firms Manage Fair Value Estimates? An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill ImpairmentsARN Wiley-Blackwell Publishers Journals
Australian CPA, 73
H. White (1980)
A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 48
Australian CPA, 72
Lídia Oliveira, L. Rodrigues, R. Craig (2010)
Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchangeBritish Accounting Review, 42
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45
PurposeThis study aims to examine the impact of the recent regime change in accounting for goodwill, from the systematic periodic amortisation to the impairment testing, on the frequency and the extent of goodwill write-offs in the context of Australia. It also examines the impact of the change from the amortisation approach to the impairment approach on the value relevance of older goodwill.Design/methodology/approachThe authors approach the first research question by comparing the actual amount of goodwill impairment charge by the sample firms with the minimum “as if” amortisation charge that would have been required under the amortisation regime. The authors approach the second question using a modified Ohlson model (1995), similar to Bugeja and Gallery (2006). The sample consists of 911 firm-year observations with the number of observations in the particular year being 238, 242, 220 and 211 in 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.FindingsThe findings suggest that the adoption of the impairment approach has decreased the frequency and the amount of goodwill write-off. The goodwill impairment amount is substantially less than the “as if” amortisation amount that would have been required under the amortisation regime. The results also suggest that older goodwill is now value-relevant, whereas goodwill purchased during the current year is not value-relevant. One reason for this may be that AASB 3: Business Combination allows for the provisional allocation of the purchase price to goodwill to be allocated to other identifiable intangible assets latter on. Hence, during the year of business combination, investors do not form a firm view of the amount of goodwill arising out of the business combination.Research limitations/implicationsThis study uses data for the first four years since the inception of the impairment approach.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study have important implications for the fair value accounting debate. The discretions allowed the managers under the impairment approach to improve the information content of goodwill. The relatively low levels of goodwill impairment even during the 2008-2009 global financial crisis contradict to the apprehensions found in the literature that managers will use the goodwill write-off as a tool for downward earnings management. The findings also imply that if managers are allowed with adequate flexibility through accounting standards rather than stipulating some systematic and mechanistic rules, the information value of the accounting measurement may improve.Social implicationsThe findings feed into the debate of “rule-based” versus “principle-based” accounting standards and favours the “principle-based” accounting standards. The findings also contribute to the accounting measurement literature by concluding that if allowed with discretionary choices, managers may not always opt for the conservative accounting measurements (such as, recording goodwill write-offs).Originality/valueAdopting an alternative approach, this study shows that the fair value accounting for goodwill has resulted in an optimistic approach to goodwill write-offs. It has also improved the information content of reported goodwill. This is the first known study addressing the research questions in consideration after the adoption of the goodwill impairment approach.
International Journal of Accounting and Information Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 6, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.