Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Holt (2014)
Asking questions, analysing answers: relative importance revisitedConstruction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 14
R. Ball, Maryanne Heafey, D. King (2003)
Some Lessons from Using PFI for School Building ProjectsLocal Government Studies, 29
(2013)
Critical success factors for public private partnership (PPP) implementation in malay2-16.sia
A. Pollock, D. Price (2008)
Has the NAO Audited Risk Transfer in Operational Private Finance Initiative Schemes?Public Money & Management, 28
(2013)
2013a), “Critical success factors for public private partnership (PPP) implementation in malay2-16.sia”, Asia-Pacific
Bing Li, A. Akintoye, P. Edwards, C. Hardcastle (2005)
Critical success factors for PPP/PFI projects in the UK construction industryConstruction Management and Economics, 23
(2004)
Success and failure mechanisms of public private partnerships (PPPs) in developing countries: insight from the Lebanese context
D. Jamali (2004)
Success and failure mechanisms of public private partnerships (PPPs) in developing countries. Insights from the Lebanese contextScopus
P. Carrillo, H. Robinson, Peter Foale, C. Anumba, D. Bouchlaghem (2008)
Participation, barriers, and opportunities in PFI: the United Kingdom experienceJournal of Management in Engineering, 24
(1981)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/fourth-malaysia-plan
(2010)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/en/tenth-malaysia-plan-10th-mp
S. Ismail, F. Haris (2014)
Constraints in implementing Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Malaysia, 4
S. Ismail (2013)
Drivers of value for money public private partnership projects in MalaysiaAsian Review of Accounting, 21
R. Takim, K. Ismail, A. Nawawi, A. Jaafar (2009)
The Malaysian Private Finance Initiative and Value for MoneyAsian Social Science, 5
(2007)
PFI cure for all ills?”, The Edge Malaysia, 2 October
Zhenli Zhao, J. Zuo, G. Zillante, Xin-Wei Wang (2010)
Critical success factors for BOT electric power projects in China: Thermal power versus wind powerRenewable Energy, 35
(1976)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/web/guest/third-malaysia- plan
(2008)
Participants, barrier and opportunities in PFI: the United Kingdom experience
(2007)
Private Finance Initiative (PFI): Concept and Method of Procurement for Construction Projects (with Specific Reference to Malaysia), IIUM, Kuala Lumpur
available at: www.ukas.gov.my/c/document_library/ get_file?
A. Akintoye, C. Hardcastle, M. Beck, E. Chinyio, D. Asenova (2003)
Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurementConstruction Management and Economics, 21
A. Coulson (2008)
VALUE FOR MONEY IN PFI PROPOSALS: A COMMENTARY ON THE UK TREASURY GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC SECTOR COMPARATORSPublic Administration, 86
P. Burger, Ian Hawkesworth (2011)
How To Attain Value for Money: Comparing PPP and Traditional Infrastructure Public ProcurementOecd Journal on Budgeting, 11
(1991)
Public private partnerships in third world development: a conceptual overview
(1990)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/en/sixth-malaysia-plan
C. Hurst, Eoin Reeves (2004)
An economic analysis of Ireland's first public private partnershipInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 17
(1983)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/en/dasar-pengkor poratan-malaysia
PM tables RM230bil 10th Malaysia Plan
G. Hodge (2004)
The risky business of public–private partnershipsAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 63
(1995)
Privatised Infrastructure: the BOT Approach, Thomas Telford, London
J. Koppenjan (2005)
The Formation of Public‐Private Partnerships: Lessons from Nine Transport Infrastructure Projects in The NetherlandsPublic Administration, 83
A. Chan, P. Lam, D. Chan, E. Cheung, Yongjian Ke (2010)
Critical Success Factors for PPPs in Infrastructure Developments: Chinese PerspectiveJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 136
(1986)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/fifth-malaysia-plan
J. Shaoul, A. Stafford, Pamela Stapleton (2008)
The Cost of Using Private Finance to Build, Finance and Operate HospitalsPublic Money & Management, 28
B. Hwang, Xianbo Zhao (2013)
Public private partnership projects in Singapore factors, critical risks and preferred risk allocation from the perspective of contractors /International Journal of Project Management, 31
Xueqing Zhang (2005)
Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure DevelopmentJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 131
Public private partnership (PPP) guidelines
Adrian Smith, C. Walker (1995)
Privatised Infrastructure - The Bot Approach
Critical success factors for public private partnership ( PPP ) implementation in malay 2 - 16
(2007)
Private Finance Initiative (PFI): Concept and Method of Procurement for Construction Projects (with Specific Reference to Malaysia)
G. Grisetti, C. Stachniss, K. Arras, Wolfram Burgard (1984)
Further ReadingInternational Journal of Christianity & Education, os-27
Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Aziz, Puteri Kassim (2011)
Objectives, success and failure factors of housing public–private partnerships in MalaysiaHabitat International, 35
T. Nisar (2007)
Value for money drivers in public private partnership schemesInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 20
(2003)
Risk management of construction public private partnership projects
(2009)
Public private partnership (PPP) guidelines, available at
(2006)
available at: www.epu.gov.my/en/ninth-malaysia-plan
R. Hodges, H. Mellett (1999)
Accounting for the Private Finance Initiative in the United Kingdom National Health ServiceFinancial Accountability and Management, 15
Nurkhuraishah Karim (2011)
Risk Allocation in Public Private Partnership (PPP) Project: A Review on Risk FactorsInternational Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 2
(2011)
Malaysian PPP framework: defining roles, processes and expectation within the context of the public private partnership unit
(2007)
PFI cure for all ills?
E. Cheung, A. Chan, S. Kajewski (2009)
Reasons for implementing public private partnership projects: Perspectives from Hong Kong, Australian and British practitionersJournal of Property Investment & Finance, 27
(2009)
available at: www.ukas.gov.my/c/ document_library
S. Ismail (2013)
Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation in MalaysiaAsia-pacific Journal of Business Administration, 5
J. Broadbent, R. Laughlin (2003)
Public Private Partnerships: An IntroductionMaking Policy Happen
(2012)
available at: www.ukas.gov.my/documents
A. Chan, Daniel Chan, Y. Chiang, B. Tang, E. Chan, Kathy Ho (2004)
Exploring Critical Success Factors for Partnering in Construction ProjectsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 130
C. Mitchell-Weaver, B. Manning (1991)
Public-private partnerships in third world development: A conceptual overiewStudies in Comparative International Development, 26
S. Ismail (2013)
Factors Attracting the Use of Public Private Partnership in Malaysia
S. Ismail, M. Pendlebury (2006)
The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) in Schools: The Experiences of UsersFinancial Accountability and Management, 22
Weibo Xiong, Xueqing Zhang (2014)
Concession Renegotiation Models for Projects Developed through Public-Private PartnershipsJournal of Construction Engineering and Management-asce, 140
L. Beh (2010)
Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public-Private Partnerships – Patronage, Privatised Profits and PitfallsAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 69
Purpose – This paper aims to, first, examine the rationale for implementation of public private partnerships (PPP) in Malaysia. Second, it investigates the differences among perceptions of the public and private sectors, in relation to the rationales for implementing PPP in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire survey captured the perceptions of the public and private sectors concerning the rationales for PPP implementation in Malaysia. Of 250 questionnaires distributed, 122 usable responses were obtained and analysed using SPSS to rank the importance of the rationales and to examine differences in perceptions between the government and private sectors. Findings – Results show that “to enhance private sector involvement in economic development” is the only rationale that was rated as most important by all respondents. While other rationales were perceived as important, “to reduce the role of the Government in providing public services and facilities” was regarded as the least important rationale by both parties. The results also reveal significant differences between public and private perceptions for the least important rationales. Originality/value – This paper offers empirical evidence on the concept and the rationales for implementing PPP in Malaysia, and also provides evidence on the differences in the perceptions of the public and private sectors in relation to these rationales.
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 28, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.