Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Douglas (1996)
Building performance and its relevance to facilities managementFacilities, 14
O. Kofoworola, S. Gheewala (2009)
Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in ThailandEnergy and Buildings, 41
T. Ramesh, R. Prakash, K. Shukla (2010)
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overviewEnergy and Buildings, 42
I. Sartori, A. Hestnes (2007)
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review articleEnergy and Buildings, 39
Y. Yohanis, Brian Norton (2002)
Life-cycle operational and embodied energy for a generic single-storey office building in the UKEnergy, 27
C. Wolf, Francesco Pomponi, A. Moncaster (2017)
Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practiceEnergy and Buildings, 140
P. Forsythe, S. Wilkinson (2015)
Measuring office fit-out changes to determine recurring embodied energy in building life cycle assessmentFacilities, 33
S. Wilkinson (2012)
Analysing sustainable retrofit potential in premium office buildingsStructural Survey, 30
A. Dimoudi, C. Tompa (2008)
Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildingsResources Conservation and Recycling, 53
F. Duffy (1990)
Measuring building performanceFacilities, 8
D. Clark (2012)
What Colour is Your Building?
W. Klöpffer (2006)
The Role of SETAC in the Development of LCAThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11
Damilola Ekundayo, S. Perera, Chika Udeaja, Lei Zhou (2012)
Carbon review and qualitative comparison of selected carbon counting tools
Craig Roussac, C. McGee, George Milne (2008)
Changing the culture of commercial buildings in Australia: the role of green leases
G. Treloar, Andrew McCoubrie, P. Love, U. Iyer-Raniga (1999)
Embodied energy analysis of fixtures, fittings and furniture in office buildingsFacilities, 17
L. Cabeza, L. Rincón, Virginia Vilariño, G. Pérez, A. Castell (2014)
Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A reviewRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29
C. Ahn, SangHyun Lee, F. Peña-Mora, S. Abourizk (2010)
Toward Environmentally Sustainable Construction Processes: The U.S. and Canada’s Perspective on Energy Consumption and GHG/CAP EmissionsSustainability, 2
Aistė Mickaityte, E. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, L. Tupėnaitė (2008)
The concept model of sustainable buildings refurbishmentInternational Journal of Strategic Property Management, 12
F. Duffy, Andrew Laing, Victoria Crisp, Degw Limited (1993)
The responsible workplace : the redesign of work and offices
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to quantify fitout churn in office buildings to more accurately evaluate the recurrent embodied energy in life cycle assessment studies.Design/methodology/approachThree research methods were used in the context of Central Business District (CBD) office buildings in Sydney. Method 1 involved leasing records from 528 office buildings; method 2, a leasing history from a selective sample of three prime grade office buildings; method 3, a targeted survey of 21 property professionals concerning fitout churn cycle estimates.FindingsPrime buildings are the area of most interest to fitout churn because they represent a large proportion of total office floor area. The churn rate differs according to office tenancy type (as defined by small, medium and large leased areas). Large tenants occupy the majority of floor space. Lease duration as obtained from Method 1, offers a reasonable proxy for predicting fitout churn. Using this method coupled with weighted-average calculations, the data indicate a fitout churn rate of 8.2 years.Research limitations/implicationsVariability concerning the situational context of Sydney CBD office buildings restricts broad generalisability of the findings. However, the research method used in this study would enable broad-based comparison and the potential for verification.Originality/valueThe main contribution of the research is to improve the ability to accurately predict fitout churn cycles as previous work only involves limited case studies and arbitrary estimates, thus lacking a strong evidence based.
International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 10, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.