Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

QUALITY CORNER Internal assessment methodologies: the ubiquity and usefulness of the Baldrige criteria

QUALITY CORNER Internal assessment methodologies: the ubiquity and usefulness of the Baldrige... Companies of all types are investing significant time and resources in regularly “assessing” themselves according to an internally designed set of criteria. More and more, these assessments are focused broadly on entire company systems and less on pure quality criteria, such as the quality of products and services. Although each firm strives to find the “right” set of criteria for their unique position, set of circumstances, and idiosyncratic culture, most seem to gravitate toward a set of loosely defined, generic characteristics which, to a remarkable extent, reflect the broad categories of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria. This article examines the linkages between broadly defined assessment criteria and the comprehensive structure of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Quality Science Emerald Publishing

QUALITY CORNER Internal assessment methodologies: the ubiquity and usefulness of the Baldrige criteria

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/quality-corner-internal-assessment-methodologies-the-ubiquity-and-vNGIdR0KaO
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1359-8538
DOI
10.1108/13598539810243676
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Companies of all types are investing significant time and resources in regularly “assessing” themselves according to an internally designed set of criteria. More and more, these assessments are focused broadly on entire company systems and less on pure quality criteria, such as the quality of products and services. Although each firm strives to find the “right” set of criteria for their unique position, set of circumstances, and idiosyncratic culture, most seem to gravitate toward a set of loosely defined, generic characteristics which, to a remarkable extent, reflect the broad categories of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Criteria. This article examines the linkages between broadly defined assessment criteria and the comprehensive structure of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award.

Journal

International Journal of Quality ScienceEmerald Publishing

Published: Dec 1, 1998

Keywords: Assessment; Baldrige Award; Kaizen; Organizational performance; Process management

There are no references for this article.