Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Z. Irani, P. Love (2002)
Developing a frame of reference for ex-ante IT/IS investment evaluationEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 11
Anders Henriksson, Yiori Yi, B. Frost, M. Middleton (2007)
Evaluation instrument for e-government websitesElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 4
R. Hirschheim, S. Smithson (1998)
Evaluation of information systems: a critical assessment
M. Saunders, P. Lewis, A. Thornhill (2006)
Research Methods for Business Students
L. AndresenJ (2002)
How to select an IT evaluation method - in the context of construction
Qing-hua Zhu, Jia Du, Xiaojing Han (2007)
The Establishment and Application of Evaluation Criteria Systems for Chinese E-Government Websites2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing
T. Curran, G. Keller, Andrew Ladd (1997)
SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model
M. Grimsley, Anthony Meehan (2007)
e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trustEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 16
F. Bannister, D. Remenyi
The societal value of ICT: first steps towards an evaluation framework
T. Horan, Tarun Abhichandani, Raghuvira Rayalu (2006)
Assessing User Satisfaction of E-Government Services: Development and Testing of Quality-in-Use Satisfaction with Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS)Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 4
A. Parasuraman, L. Berry, V. Zeithaml (1988)
A MULTIPLE-ITEM SCALE FOR MEASURING CUSTOMER PERCEPTIONS OF SERVICE QUALITY, 64
S. Alshawi, Ali Alahmary, Hamid Alalwany (2007)
E-Government evaluation factors: Citizen’s perspective
B. Curtis, M. Kellner, J. Over (1992)
Process modelingCommun. ACM, 35
V. Zeithaml, A. Parasuraman, A. Malhotra (2000)
A conceptual framework for understanding e-service quality : implications for future research and managerial practice
Reda Bendraou, M. Gervais (2007)
A Framework for Classifying and Comparing Process Technology DomainsInternational Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2007)
OECD
E‐government project, towards indicators for benchmarking government ICT: issues paper
S. Acuña, X. Ferré (2001)
Software Process Modelling
S. Alshawi, Hamid Alalwany (2009)
E-government evaluation: Citizen's perspective in developing countriesInformation Technology for Development, 15
Z. Irani, Madi Al-Sebie, Tony Elliman (2006)
Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of Its Location and ImportanceProceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06), 4
F. Wood, E. Siegel, E. Lacroix, Becky Lyon, D. Benson, V. Cid, Susan Fariss (2003)
A practical approach to e-government Web evaluationIT Professional, 5
D. Griffin, E. Halpin
An exploratory evaluation of UK local e‐government from an accountability perspective
P. Shackleton, J. Fisher, L. Dawson (2006)
E-government services in the local government context: an Australian case studyBus. Process. Manag. J., 12
J. Fountain (2003)
Prospects for improving the regulatory process using e-rulemakingCommun. ACM, 46
Wil Aalst, A. Dreiling, F. Gottschalk, M. Rosemann, M. Jansen-Vullers (2005)
Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling
T. Davenport (1992)
Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology
M. Middleton (2007)
Approaches to evaluation of websites for public sector services
S. Hung, Chia-Ming Chang, Ting-Jing Yu (2006)
Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment systemGov. Inf. Q., 23
Meenakshi Gupta, D. Jana (2003)
E-government evaluation: a framework and case studyGov. Inf. Q., 20
I.H. Osman, A. Anouze, Z. Irani, H. Lee, V. Weerakkody
A new COBRAS framework to evaluate e‐government services: a citizen centric
A. Money, A. Twite, D. Remenyi (1995)
Effective Measurement and Management of It Costs and Benefits: Key Issues
A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, L. Berry (1988)
SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing, 64
Z. Irani, P. Love, Tony Elliman, Steve Jones, Marinos Themistocleous (2005)
Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authoritiesInformation Systems Journal, 15
J. Ballantine, S. Stray (1999)
Information systems and other capital investments: evaluation practices comparedLogistics Information Management, 12
F. Bélanger, Lemuria Carter (2008)
Trust and Risk in eGovernment AdoptionJ. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 17
R. Naz (2009)
E-Governance for Improved Public Service Delivery in FijiJournal of Service Science and Management, 02
Ruth Aguilar-Savén (2004)
Business process modelling: Review and frameworkInternational Journal of Production Economics, 90
D. Remenyi, A. Money, M. Sherwood‐Smith, Z. Irani
Effective Measurement and Management of IT Costs and Benefits
D. Remenyi, A. Money, F. Bannister (2007)
The effective measurement and management of ICT costs and benefits. 3rd edition.
European Commission
Smarter, Faster, Better eGovernment, 8th eGovernment Benchmark Measurement
M. Rosa, F. Gottschalk, M. Dumas, Wil Aalst (2007)
Linking Domain Models and Process Models for Reference Model Configuration
Purpose – Evaluating and optimizing e‐government services is imperative for governments especially due to the capacity of e‐services to transform public administrations and assist the interactions of governments with citizens, businesses and other government agencies. Existing widely applied evaluation approaches neglect to incorporate citizens' satisfaction measures. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to contribute to the understanding of citizen‐centric e‐government evaluation and unify existing key performance indicators (KPIs); and to propose a reference process model of a novel evaluation approach that uses the unified KPIs to facilitate the creation of a “know‐how” repository. Design/methodology/approach – The authors adopt a quantitative research approach for the evaluation of e‐government services that is based on data envelope analysis (DEA). A survey was conducted for the empirical investigation and data were collected from 13 e‐government services in Turkey. Based on the empirical application of the e‐government evaluation method, a reference process model is designed. Findings – The proposed evaluation method was proved valid and able to provide assessment with richer explanations than traditional statistical measurements. DEA enabled the identification of insufficient e‐government services and the provision of suggested improvements. Research limitations/implications – The reference process model is constructed based on the experience gained by applying the method to a sole cultural setting;, i.e. e‐government services in Turkey. Practical implications – The proposed evaluation method, in comparison to other user‐oriented ones, provided assessments with richer explanations than traditional statistical measurements, such as structured equation modelling. The reference process model constructed based on the empirical research is expected to accelerate the citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐government and promote impact‐oriented indicators. Originality/value – This is the first application of DEA in the e‐government field, although it has been widely applied for performance measurement in other fields, especially operations research. The novelty of DEA is that the assessment results provide suggestions for strategic improvement of the e‐services.
Transforming Government People Process and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 24, 2013
Keywords: Reference process model; evaluation; E‐government services; Public administration; E‐government; Turkey
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.