Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Kumbhakar, C. Lovell (2000)
Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter
(2006)
TFP changes in Chinese Dairy Industry – based on Malmquist index”, China Rural Survey (Zhongguo Nongcun Guancha)
G. Battese, T. Coelli (1992)
Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in IndiaJournal of Productivity Analysis, 3
(2005)
“ Chinese dairy farms ’ economic efficiency analysis ”
Rainer Holst, Xiaohua Yu, Carola Grün (2013)
Climate Change, Risk and Grain Yields in ChinaJournal of Integrative Agriculture, 12
(2005)
Chinese dairy farms’ economic efficiency analysis”, China Rural Economy (Zhong guo Nong cun Jing Ji)
Qingbin Wang, R. Parsons, Guangxuan Zhang (2010)
China's dairy markets: trends, disparities, and implications for tradeChina Agricultural Economic Review, 2
S.C. Kumbhakar, C.A.K. Lovell
Stochastic Frontier Analysis
F. Fuller, Jikun Huang, Hengyun Ma, S. Rozelle (2006)
Got Milk? The Rapid Rise of China's Dairy Sector and Its Future Prospects
L. Zhang
TFP changes in Chinese Dairy Industry – based on Malmquist index
Hengyun Ma, A. Rae, Jikun Huang, S. Rozelle (2007)
Enhancing productivity on suburban dairy farms in ChinaAgricultural Economics, 37
Jing Yang, T. Macaulay, Wenhua Shen (2004)
The Dairy Industry in China: An Analysis of Supply, Demand and Policy Issues
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify the structural problem in the Chinese dairy sector. There exists a large number of low‐efficiency, small‐scale farms, and productivity inequality between small and large farms keeps increasing, which is a possible driving force behind the Melamine scandal in 2008. Design/methodology/approach – Using the stochastic frontier production function, this paper estimates and compares the changes in technology and technical efficiency between backyard, small‐scale, medium‐scale and large‐scale dairy farms in China over the period between 2004 and 2008. Findings – There are compensating effects between technology and technical efficiency. However, low yield for backyard farms is mainly caused by traditional low‐yield varieties, even though the technical efficiency is very high, which cannot compensate for the low technology. Research limitations/implications – The author put the assumption of constant return to scale mainly due to the data availability. Such an assumption implies that there are no scale‐effects between the different scales in productivity, and the productivity difference is explained by technology and technical efficiency. Practical implications – In order to solve the structural problems, Chinese governments should help small‐scale farmers to adopt new high‐yield varieties, to subsidize small‐scale farmers, and to train farmers to master the complicated skills for raising high‐yield varieties. Originality/value – The paper gives another possible explanation for the Melamine scandal of milk powder in 2008. If the structural problem cannot be solved, similar food safety scandals could happen once again.
China Agricultural Economic Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 4, 2012
Keywords: China; Agriculture; Farms; Productive capacity; Chinese dairy farmers; Productivity; Technical efficiency; Structural problems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.