Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

PORTER'S GENERIC STRATEGIES, DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS, AND PERFORMANCE A PROFILE DEVIATION FIT PERSPECTIVE

PORTER'S GENERIC STRATEGIES, DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS, AND PERFORMANCE A PROFILE DEVIATION FIT... This study reports an examination of the relationships between Porter's 1980 generic strategies, dynamic environments, and performance. In me study, profile deviation is used to test strategyenvironment fit. A sample of 173 acute care hospitals was used to test the proposed relationship. Results from the study indicate that adherence to an externally specified ideal strategy profile has a positive effect on firm performance. From a methodological standpoint, results suggest that empirical and theoretical profiles have equal predictive validity, and both have a higher predictive validity, than a random profile. Results also suggest that profiles can not be assumed to be robust to differences in performance measures used. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The International Journal of Organizational Analysis Emerald Publishing

PORTER'S GENERIC STRATEGIES, DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS, AND PERFORMANCE A PROFILE DEVIATION FIT PERSPECTIVE

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/porter-s-generic-strategies-dynamic-environments-and-performance-a-cBq1ainjGT
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1055-3185
DOI
10.1108/eb028806
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study reports an examination of the relationships between Porter's 1980 generic strategies, dynamic environments, and performance. In me study, profile deviation is used to test strategyenvironment fit. A sample of 173 acute care hospitals was used to test the proposed relationship. Results from the study indicate that adherence to an externally specified ideal strategy profile has a positive effect on firm performance. From a methodological standpoint, results suggest that empirical and theoretical profiles have equal predictive validity, and both have a higher predictive validity, than a random profile. Results also suggest that profiles can not be assumed to be robust to differences in performance measures used.

Journal

The International Journal of Organizational AnalysisEmerald Publishing

Published: Feb 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.