Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Perspectives and practice the satisfaction construct

Perspectives and practice the satisfaction construct Patient satisfaction is measured at all levels of the Australian health system. However, these activities are not guided by formal national policy, nor is there a uniform approach to measuring patient satisfaction. While the reasons for exploring patient satisfaction are widely supported and can be easily documented, the construct of patient satisfaction itself remains ambiguous. Although health practitioners frequently refer to patient satisfaction when evaluating health care services it is not clear if practitioners share a clear perspective or understanding about the meaning of the construct. Exploring the practitioners own understanding of what is meant by patient satisfaction is a critical first step before any comparative analysis between the practitioners understanding, the dimensionality of measurement tools, and the beliefs of the consumer can be conducted. This paper explores Australian health practitioners understanding of patient satisfaction.A convenience sample of 29 staff representing 17 hospitals from across Australian States and Territories consented to participate in a series of focus groups. Systematic ethnographic summary and content analysis revealed 15 themes which health practitioners considered important in making a patients hospital stay satisfactory. However, health practitioners, even those involved with measuring patient satisfaction, struggled to either define patient satisfaction or clarify what the phenomenon meant empirically. While hospitals commonly report the outcomes of evaluating patient satisfaction, this research suggests that the value of such reports in everyday practice may be limited by confusion and ambiguity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

Perspectives and practice the satisfaction construct

Henderson, Amanda
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 6 (1): 16 – Apr 6, 2006
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/perspectives-and-practice-the-satisfaction-construct-mLeKIxZOr4

References (6)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/14439883200600002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is measured at all levels of the Australian health system. However, these activities are not guided by formal national policy, nor is there a uniform approach to measuring patient satisfaction. While the reasons for exploring patient satisfaction are widely supported and can be easily documented, the construct of patient satisfaction itself remains ambiguous. Although health practitioners frequently refer to patient satisfaction when evaluating health care services it is not clear if practitioners share a clear perspective or understanding about the meaning of the construct. Exploring the practitioners own understanding of what is meant by patient satisfaction is a critical first step before any comparative analysis between the practitioners understanding, the dimensionality of measurement tools, and the beliefs of the consumer can be conducted. This paper explores Australian health practitioners understanding of patient satisfaction.A convenience sample of 29 staff representing 17 hospitals from across Australian States and Territories consented to participate in a series of focus groups. Systematic ethnographic summary and content analysis revealed 15 themes which health practitioners considered important in making a patients hospital stay satisfactory. However, health practitioners, even those involved with measuring patient satisfaction, struggled to either define patient satisfaction or clarify what the phenomenon meant empirically. While hospitals commonly report the outcomes of evaluating patient satisfaction, this research suggests that the value of such reports in everyday practice may be limited by confusion and ambiguity.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 6, 2006

There are no references for this article.