Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Performance and significance of UK‐listed infrastructure in a mixed‐asset portfolio

Performance and significance of UK‐listed infrastructure in a mixed‐asset portfolio Purpose – This paper aims to examine the performance of UK‐listed infrastructure over a unique investment period covering the global financial crisis and investigates the significance of UK infrastructure in a multi‐asset portfolio. The analysis reveals the level of correlation of UK infrastructure with other major assets classes and substantiates the potential diversification benefits of including UK infrastructure within a mixed‐asset portfolio. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses monthly investment return indices obtained from Thomson Reuters DataStream over a ten‐year period (2001‐2010). The paper analyzed the UK‐listed infrastructure investment return characteristics including average annual return, annual risk, Sharpe indices, mean variance portfolio and maximum return portfolio and computes the efficient portfolio frontiers using the risk‐solver optimization tool. Findings – The performance results show that UK infrastructure produced better risk‐return trade‐offs than those of UK property, private equity, hedge funds and UK stocks over 2001‐2010. Overall, for the ten‐year period, UK Water was the best performing asset class, outperforming all other asset classes having the highest Sharpe ratio of 0.75. Practical implications – Using the monthly return indices over the ten‐year period, UK‐listed infrastructure investment was found to play a consistently significant role in the optimality of mixed‐asset portfolios. However, the diversification benefits were more return enhancing than risk reducing, offering investors a platform for matching investment objectives with expectations resulting from a better understanding of the characteristics of UK‐listed infrastructure investments. Originality/value – As investors seek better understanding of the performance of infrastructure across the globe, with most previous studies focusing on Australia, USA and China, the paper makes significant contribution to the body of knowledge by focusing on UK, a promising investment space for infrastructure industry. Also, given the debate surrounding the emergence of infrastructure as a separate asset class, the paper particularly projects the potential benefits of investing in UK‐listed infrastructure, offering investors a distinctive platform to launch into a vibrant asset class. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of European Real Estate Research Emerald Publishing

Performance and significance of UK‐listed infrastructure in a mixed‐asset portfolio

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/performance-and-significance-of-uk-listed-infrastructure-in-a-mixed-J0SR56jq3u
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1753-9269
DOI
10.1108/JERER-08-2013-0015
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the performance of UK‐listed infrastructure over a unique investment period covering the global financial crisis and investigates the significance of UK infrastructure in a multi‐asset portfolio. The analysis reveals the level of correlation of UK infrastructure with other major assets classes and substantiates the potential diversification benefits of including UK infrastructure within a mixed‐asset portfolio. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses monthly investment return indices obtained from Thomson Reuters DataStream over a ten‐year period (2001‐2010). The paper analyzed the UK‐listed infrastructure investment return characteristics including average annual return, annual risk, Sharpe indices, mean variance portfolio and maximum return portfolio and computes the efficient portfolio frontiers using the risk‐solver optimization tool. Findings – The performance results show that UK infrastructure produced better risk‐return trade‐offs than those of UK property, private equity, hedge funds and UK stocks over 2001‐2010. Overall, for the ten‐year period, UK Water was the best performing asset class, outperforming all other asset classes having the highest Sharpe ratio of 0.75. Practical implications – Using the monthly return indices over the ten‐year period, UK‐listed infrastructure investment was found to play a consistently significant role in the optimality of mixed‐asset portfolios. However, the diversification benefits were more return enhancing than risk reducing, offering investors a platform for matching investment objectives with expectations resulting from a better understanding of the characteristics of UK‐listed infrastructure investments. Originality/value – As investors seek better understanding of the performance of infrastructure across the globe, with most previous studies focusing on Australia, USA and China, the paper makes significant contribution to the body of knowledge by focusing on UK, a promising investment space for infrastructure industry. Also, given the debate surrounding the emergence of infrastructure as a separate asset class, the paper particularly projects the potential benefits of investing in UK‐listed infrastructure, offering investors a distinctive platform to launch into a vibrant asset class.

Journal

Journal of European Real Estate Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 29, 2014

Keywords: Portfolio diversification; Efficient frontiers; UK‐listed infrastructure

References

  • Pension fund investment in infrastructure: pensions and capital stewardship project labor and work life program
    Beeferman, L.W.
  • Risk, return and cash flow characteristics of infrastructure fund investment
    Bitsch, F.; Buchner, A.; Kaserer, C.
  • Investments characteristics in infrastructure industry
    Dobrea, R.C.; Ciocoiu, N.; Stelian Tipa, S.
  • Infrastructure investments — the governmental asset class opportunity
    Evans, S.F.
  • Infrastructure: a new dimension of real estate? An asset allocation analysis
    Finkenzeller, K.; Dechant, T.; Schafers, W.
  • Pension fund investment in infrastructure
    Inderst, G.
  • The role of European infrastructure in investment portfolios
    Newell, G.; Peng, H.W.
  • The role of US infrastructure in investment portfolios
    Newell, G.; Peng, H.W.
  • The significance and performance of infrastructure in China
    Newell, G.; Chau, K.W.; Wong, S.K.
  • The performance of unlisted infrastructure in investment portfolios
    Newell, G.; Peng, H.W.; De Francesco, A.
  • Performance and role of European listed infrastructure in a mixed‐asset portfolio
    Oyedele, J.; McGreal, S. Adair, A.; Ogedengbe, P.
  • Performance of global listed infrastructure investment in a mixed asset portfolio
    Oyedele, J.; Adair, A.; McGreal, S.
  • The significance of infrastructure in Australian investment portfolios
    Peng, H.W.; Newell, G.
  • Preqin Database 2009.
    Preqin
  • Opportunities in private infrastructure investments in the US
    RREEF
  • Performance characteristics of infrastructure investments
    RREEF
  • Global ports: trends and opportunities
    RREEF
  • European infrastructure
    RREEF
  • A compelling investment opportunity: the case for global listed infrastructure revisited
    RREEF
  • Can infrastructure investing enhance portfolio efficiency?
    Russ, D.; Thambiah, Y.; Foscari, N.
  • The significance and performance of infrastructure in India
    Singhal, S.; Newell, G.; Nguyen, T.K.
  • UK infrastructure: investment opportunities
    Smith, H.