Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Skinner, Paula Stephens (2003)
Speaking the same language: the relevance of neuro‐linguistic programming to effective marketing communicationsJournal of Marketing Communications, 9
E. Wertheim, Cherine Habib, G. Cumming (1986)
Test of the Neurolinguistic Programming Hypothesis That Eye-Movements Relate to Processing ImageryPerceptual and Motor Skills, 62
H. Ehrlichman, A. Weinberger (1978)
Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: a critical review.Psychological bulletin, 85 5
H. Skinner, R. Croft (2009)
Neuro‐linguistic programming techniques to improve the self‐efficacy of undergraduate dissertation studentsJournal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 1
R. Bandler, John Grinder (1979)
Frogs into princes : neuro linguistic programming
Joseph O'Connor, J. Seymour, R. Dilts, John Grinder (1993)
Introducing Neuro-Linguistic Programming: Psychological Skills for Understanding and Influencing People
R. Feynman, P. Sackett (1985)
‘‘Surely You’re Joking Mr. Feynman!’’ Adventures of a Curious CharacterAmerican Journal of Physics, 53
R. Bandler (1975)
The Structure Of Magic
C. Sharpley (1984)
Predicate Matching in NLP: A Review of Research on the Preferred Representational SystemJournal of Counseling Psychology, 31
Keith Hyatt (2007)
Brain Gym®Remedial and Special Education, 28
S. Linder-Pelz, Michael Hall (2007)
The theoretical roots of NLP-based coachingThe Coaching Psychologist
Anna Craft (2001)
Neuro-linguistic Programming and learning theoryThe Curriculum Journal, 12
John Grinder, R. Bandler (1976)
The structure of magic: II.
M. Heap (2008)
THE VALIDITY OF SOME EARLY CLAIMS OF NEURO-LINGUISTIC PROGRAMMING
P. Tosey, J. Mathison (2003)
Neuro-linguistic programming and learning theory: a responseThe Curriculum Journal, 14
C. Sagan (1995)
The demon-haunted world. Science as a candle in the dark
C. Sharpley (1987)
Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?
Neuro‐linguistic programming (NLP) is a popular form of inter‐personal skill and communication training. Originating in the 1970s, the technique made specific claims about the ways in which individuals processed the world about them, and quickly established itself, not only as an aid to communication, but as a form of psychotherapy in its own right. Today, NLP is big business with large numbers of training courses, personal development programmes, therapeutic and educational interventions purporting to be based on the principles of NLP. This paper explores what NLP is, the evidence for it, and issues related to its use. It concludes that after three decades, there is still no credible theoretical basis for NLP, researchers having failed to establish any evidence for its efficacy that is not anecdotal.
Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2009
Keywords: Neuro‐linguistic programming; Theoretical credibility; Cargo‐cult psychology
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.