Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Negotiating conflicts of interest: working with multiple stakeholders

Negotiating conflicts of interest: working with multiple stakeholders The purpose of this article is to examine conflicts of interest (COI) in qualitative social research with multiple and often powerful stakeholders such as organisations and funders.Design/methodology/approachThe article offers an explorative qualitative analysis of a selected group of Danish doctoral students' experiences and negotiations of COI in their qualitative, multiple stakeholder research. The point of departure is that while potential and readily identifiable sources of COI, such as funding institutions, are important to disclose this may provide inadequate insight into stakeholders' actual – and potentially undue – influence on the research during the research process. This calls for a focus on research practice. Finally, the current neoliberal policy changes affecting universities provide the backdrop for the study.FindingsFocusing on negotiations around COI in practice, the analysis illuminates the complex reality of negotiating different – and sometimes conflicting – expectations and interests when conducting long-term qualitative studies. It also shows examples of stakeholders' attempts to potentially, and unduly, influence doctoral students' research. Finally, it suggests that stakeholders and researchers alike can be both powerful and potentially vulnerable when engaging in qualitative research.Originality/valueThe article contributes to the existing literature by explicitly focusing on COI in qualitative social research, and by exploring experiences and negotiations of COI in practice. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

Negotiating conflicts of interest: working with multiple stakeholders

Kristensen, Catharina Juul
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 21 (1): 11 – Jan 19, 2021
Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/negotiating-conflicts-of-interest-working-with-multiple-stakeholders-EurKNIj0NR
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/qrj-12-2019-0103
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine conflicts of interest (COI) in qualitative social research with multiple and often powerful stakeholders such as organisations and funders.Design/methodology/approachThe article offers an explorative qualitative analysis of a selected group of Danish doctoral students' experiences and negotiations of COI in their qualitative, multiple stakeholder research. The point of departure is that while potential and readily identifiable sources of COI, such as funding institutions, are important to disclose this may provide inadequate insight into stakeholders' actual – and potentially undue – influence on the research during the research process. This calls for a focus on research practice. Finally, the current neoliberal policy changes affecting universities provide the backdrop for the study.FindingsFocusing on negotiations around COI in practice, the analysis illuminates the complex reality of negotiating different – and sometimes conflicting – expectations and interests when conducting long-term qualitative studies. It also shows examples of stakeholders' attempts to potentially, and unduly, influence doctoral students' research. Finally, it suggests that stakeholders and researchers alike can be both powerful and potentially vulnerable when engaging in qualitative research.Originality/valueThe article contributes to the existing literature by explicitly focusing on COI in qualitative social research, and by exploring experiences and negotiations of COI in practice.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 19, 2021

Keywords: Doctoral students; Conflicts of interest; Research integrity; Research stakeholders; Stakeholder and researcher vulnerability

References

  • Researching the powerful: a call for the reconstruction of research ethics
    Alvesalo-Kuusi, A.; Whyte, D.
  • Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research
    Alvesson, M.
  • Is there social consensus regarding researcher conflicts of interest?
    Aytug, Z.G.
  • The ethics of management research: an exploratory content analysis
    Bell, E.; Bryman, A.
  • What's it to me? Self-interest and evaluation of financial conflicts of interest
    Bruton, S.V.; Sacco, D.F.
  • The researcher interview: a reflexive perspective
    Bryman, A.; Cassell, C.
  • Identifying indicators of university autonomy according to stakeholders' interests
    Choi, S.
  • Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research
    Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S.; Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S.
  • Financial conflicts of interest and criteria for research credibility
    Elliott, K.C.
  • Researching the researcher: the heart and mind in sub-prime times
    Emerald, E.; Carpenter, L.
  • Conflict of interest in the evaluation and dissemination of “model” school-based drug and violence prevention programs
    Gorman, D.M.; Conde, E.
  • Videnskabelig praksis. Det etiske felt i antropologien
    Hastrup, K.; Hastrup, K.
  • The ethical dilemmas and social scientific trade-offs of masking in ethnography
    Jerolmack, C.; Murphy, A.K.
  • Combatting the funding effect in science: what's beyond transparency?
    Krimsky, S.
  • Komplekse hensyn: mesoetiske udfordringer og håndteringer
    Kristensen, C.J.
  • Forskningsintegritet og interessekonflikter
    Kristensen, C.J.; Petersen, K.E.; Ladefoged, L.
  • Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain
    Lancaster, K.
  • Preface
    Mayer, T.; Steneck, N.H.; Mayer, T.; Steneck, N.H.
  • Critical ethnographic research: negotiations, influences, and interests
    Nyberg, D.; Delaney, H.; Jeanes, E.; Huzzard, T.
  • The neoliberal university and its alternatives
    Rustin, M.
  • Best foot forward, watching your step, jumping in with both feet, or sticking your foot in it?
    Saltmarsh, S.
  • Samfundsvidenskabelig forskningsetik
    Vedel-Petersen, J.; Hartlev, M.
  • Business research ethics: participant observer perspectives
    Wallace, M.; Sheldon, N.
  • The Singapore statement on research integrity