Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2014)
International Maritime Organization (IMO), London
L. Zhen, Miao Li, Zhuang Hu, Wenya Lv, Xiao Zhao (2018)
The effects of emission control area regulations on cruise shippingTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
K. Fagerholt, H. Psaraftis (2015)
On two speed optimization problems for ships that sail in and out of emission control areasTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 39
M. Dulebenets (2016)
Advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within emission control areas, 1
Oil solution
MGO price at Singapore
Marine environment protection committee 66th session", available at: www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/Marine-Environment-Protection-Committee-(MEPC)/Pages
J. Cofala, M. Amann, J. Borken-Kleefeld, A. Sanabria, C. Heyes, G. Kiesewetter, R. Sander, W. Schöpp, Michael Holland, H. Fagerli, Á. Nýıri (2018)
Final Report The potential for cost-effective air emission reductions from international shipping through designation of further Emission Control Areas in EU waters with focus on the Mediterranean Sea
Yewen Gu, S. Wallace (2017)
Scrubber: a potentially overestimated compliance method for the Emission Control Areas - The importance of involving a ship's sailing pattern in the evaluationTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 55
Marine environment protection committee 71st session
K. Fagerholt, Nora Gausel, J. Rakke, H. Psaraftis (2015)
Maritime routing and speed optimization with emission control areasTransportation Research Part C-emerging Technologies, 52
(2016)
Advantages and disadvantages from enforcing emission restrictions within emission control areas”,Maritime
Marine air emission control areas implementation scheme
Linying Chen, T. Yip, J. Mou (2017)
Provision of Emission Control Area and the impact on shipping route choice and ship emissionsTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 58
Sulphur oxides (SOx) and particulate matter (PM) -regulation 14
Proposal to designate an emission control area for nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides and particulate matter
Z. Nikopoulou, K. Cullinane, A. Jensen (2013)
The role of a cap-and-trade market in reducing NO x and SO x emissions: Prospects and benefits for ships within the Northern European ECAProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 227
E. Carr, J. Corbett (2015)
Ship Compliance in Emission Control Areas: Technology Costs and Policy Instruments.Environmental science & technology, 49 16
How a vessel switches to low sulfur fuel when entering ECAs
Improving the quality of diesel fuel burned by local vessels
Dian Sheng, Q. Meng, Zhi-Chun Li (2019)
Optimal vessel speed and fleet size for industrial shipping services under the emission control area regulationTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Marjorie Doudnikoff, Romuald Lacoste (2014)
Effect of a speed reduction of containerships in response to higher energy costs in Sulphur Emission Control AreasTransportation Research Part D-transport and Environment, 28
(2015)
Implementation plan on domestic emission control areas in waters of the Pearl river Delta, the Yangtze river Delta and Bohai Rim (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei)
Implementation plan on domestic emission control areas in waters of the Pearl river Delta, the Yangtze river Delta and Bohai Rim
(2019)
Platts’ starts assessment of 0.5% sulphur marine fuel price in Singapore: US $366.18/tonne
T. Smith, J. Jalkanen, B. Anderson, J. Corbett, J. Faber, S. Hanayama, E. O'Keeffe, S. Parker, L. Johanasson, L. Aldous, C. Raucci, M. Traut, S. Ettinger, D. Nelissen, David Lee, S. Ng, A. Agrawal, J. Winebrake, M. Hoen, S. Chesworth, A. Pandey (2015)
Third IMO GHG Study
The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of China’s potential domestic emission control area (DECA) with 0.1 per cent sulphur limit on sulphur emission reduction.Design/methodology/approachThe authors calculate the fuel cost of a direct path within the DECA and a path that bypasses the DECA for ships that sail between two Chinese ports in view of the DECA. Ships adopt the path with the lower cost and the resulting sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions can be calculated. They then conduct sensitivity analysis of the SO2 emissions with different values of the parameters related to sailing distance, fuel price and ships.FindingsThe results show that ships tend to detour to bypass the DECA when the distance between the two ports is long, the ratio of the price of low sulphur fuel and that of high sulphur fuel is high and the required time for fuel switching is long. If the time required for fuel switching is less than 12 h or even 24 h, it can be anticipated that a large number of ships will bypass the DECA, undermining the SO2 reduction effect of the DECA.Originality/valueThis study points out the size and shape difference between the emission control areas in Europe and North America and China’s DECA affects ships’ path choice and SO2 emissions.
Maritime Business Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 18, 2019
Keywords: Domestic emission control area of China; Emission control areas; Shipping air emissions
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.