Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Measuring perceived procedural fairness in the context of power grid expansion

Measuring perceived procedural fairness in the context of power grid expansion Governments and energy operators are often confronted with opposition to the construction of new high-voltage transmission lines. Besides other factors, a potential determinant of public opposition and acceptance that has gained increasing attention is the fairness of the planning and approval procedure as perceived by the citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a scale for measuring perceived procedural fairness (PPF).Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed the ten-item “perceived procedural fairness scale (PPFS)” and assessed its quality by means of item response theory. By using a Rasch rating scale model, the authors tested whether the instrument met the requirements of this kind of measurement model. For conducting their research, the authors used data from two telephone surveys in Germany that were collected in areas that are affected by grid expansion.FindingsThe findings suggest that the scale can be considered a reliable and internal valid instrument for measuring citizens’ PPF.Originality/valueAt the moment, there is no psychometrically rigorously evaluated scale available for measuring PPF in the context of power grid expansion. Therefore, the study contributes to filling this gap and provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners concerned with further investigating citizens’ PPF and its relationships with other relevant constructs in the field. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Energy Sector Management Emerald Publishing

Measuring perceived procedural fairness in the context of power grid expansion

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/measuring-perceived-procedural-fairness-in-the-context-of-power-grid-uVof3MjFsC

References (54)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1750-6220
DOI
10.1108/ijesm-02-2019-0002
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Governments and energy operators are often confronted with opposition to the construction of new high-voltage transmission lines. Besides other factors, a potential determinant of public opposition and acceptance that has gained increasing attention is the fairness of the planning and approval procedure as perceived by the citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a scale for measuring perceived procedural fairness (PPF).Design/methodology/approachThe authors developed the ten-item “perceived procedural fairness scale (PPFS)” and assessed its quality by means of item response theory. By using a Rasch rating scale model, the authors tested whether the instrument met the requirements of this kind of measurement model. For conducting their research, the authors used data from two telephone surveys in Germany that were collected in areas that are affected by grid expansion.FindingsThe findings suggest that the scale can be considered a reliable and internal valid instrument for measuring citizens’ PPF.Originality/valueAt the moment, there is no psychometrically rigorously evaluated scale available for measuring PPF in the context of power grid expansion. Therefore, the study contributes to filling this gap and provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners concerned with further investigating citizens’ PPF and its relationships with other relevant constructs in the field.

Journal

International Journal of Energy Sector ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 9, 2020

Keywords: Policy; Procedural fairness; Procedural justice; Energy infrastructure; Power grid expansion; Item response theory; Rasch modelling

There are no references for this article.