Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Holcombe (1921)
Administrative Reorganization in the Federal GovernmentThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 95
(2006)
Critical theorizing in management accounting research
Aiasdair Roberts (1996)
Why The Brownlow Commijtee Failed: Neutrality and Partisanship in the Early Years of Public AdministrationAdministration & Society, 28
Q. Skinner (1969)
Meaning and understanding in the history of ideasHistory and Theory, 8
J. Osiri (2020)
Igbo management philosophy: a key for success in AfricaJournal of Management History, 26
J. White (2002)
Executive Reorganization, Theodore roosevelt and the keep commissionAdministrative Theory & Praxis, 24
(1991)
Learning from samples of one or less
J. Farr, J. Gunnell, Raymond Seidelman, J. Dryzek, Stephen Leonard (1990)
Can Political Science History be Neutral?American Political Science Review, 84
J. March, Johan Olsen (1983)
The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political LifeAmerican Political Science Review, 78
R. Goodman, E. Kruger (1988)
Data Dredging or Legitimate Research Method? Historiography and Its Potential for Management ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 13
J. March, Johan Olson (1983)
Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about GovernmentAmerican Political Science Review, 77
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
D. Moynihan (2004)
Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement “Managing for Results” Reforms?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15
Gabrielle Durepos, A. Mills (2012)
Actor-Network Theory, ANTi-History and critical organizational historiographyOrganization, 19
Jonathan Bendor, T. Moe, K. Shotts (2001)
Recycling the Garbage Can: An Assessment of the Research ProgramAmerican Political Science Review, 95
D. Osborne, T. Gaebler (1992)
Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from schoolhouse to state houseCity Hall to Pentagon
Mie Augier, J. March, B. Sullivan (2005)
Notes on the Evolution of a Research Community: Organization Studies in Anglophone North America, 1945-2000Organ. Sci., 16
A. Kieser (1994)
Why Organization Theory Needs Historical Analyses-And How This Should Be PerformedOrganization Science, 5
A. Norman (1991)
Telling it Like it Was: Historical Narratives on Their Own TermsHistory and Theory, 30
Joan Acker (1990)
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:Gender & Society, 4
Peri Arnold (1981)
Executive Reorganization & the Origins of the Managerial PresidencyPolity, 13
Peri Arnold (1976)
The First Hoover Commission and the Managerial PresidencyThe Journal of Politics, 38
Guy Adams (1992)
Enthralled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration.Public Administration Review, 52
(2020)
Toward active reflexivity: positionality and practice in the production of research
(1934)
Social forces and the reorganization of the federal bureaucracy
DeLysa Burnier (2006)
Masculine Markets and Feminine Care: A Gender Analysis of the National Performance ReviewPublic Administration Review, 66
Michael Cohen, J. March, Johan Olsen (1972)
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
Tom Christensen, Per Lægreid (2003)
Administrative Reform Policy: The Challenges of Turning Symbols into PracticePublic Organization Review, 3
F. Coker (1922)
Dogmas of Administrative Reform: As Exemplified in the Recent Reorganization in OhioAmerican Political Science Review, 16
J. Muldoon (2020)
Conflicting Visions: A Recap About the Debates Within Management HistoryThe Palgrave Handbook of Management History
J. Cox, J. Hassard (2007)
Ties to the Past in Organization Research: A Comparative Analysis of Retrospective MethodsOrganization, 14
James Garnett (1987)
Operationalizing the Constitution Via Administrative Reorganization: Oilcans, Trends, and ProverbsPublic Administration Review, 47
J. March (2017)
Emerging Developments in the Study of OrganizationsThe Review of Higher Education, 6
American Political Science Review, 43
S. Wagner-Tsukamoto (2008)
Scientific Management Revisited: Did Taylorism Fail Because of a Too Positive Image of Human Nature?Journal of Management History, 14
B. Lawrence (1984)
Historical Perspective: Using the Past to Study the PresentAcademy of Management Review, 9
J. Yen (2004)
IntroductionCommun. ACM, 47
(1998)
History and identity in the field of public administration: an analysis from public administration review
(1998)
The municipal reform movement’s influence on the office of the president
D. Treisman (2020)
Democracy by Mistake: How the Errors of Autocrats Trigger Transitions to Freer GovernmentAmerican Political Science Review, 114
H. Vroman (1994)
Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public SectorAcademy of Management Perspectives, 8
J. March (2013)
In praise of beauty, 16
B. Karl (1977)
Executive Reorganization and Presidential PowerThe Supreme Court Review, 1977
Peri Arnold (1974)
Reorganization and Politics: A Reflection on the Adequacy of Administrative TheoryPublic Administration Review, 34
G. Kerr (2011)
What Simon said: the impact of the major management works of Herbert SimonJournal of Management History, 17
History and Theory, 30
R. Bork (1977)
Vertical Restraints: Schwinn OverruledThe Supreme Court Review, 1977
Mie Augier (2004)
James March on Education, Leadership, and Don Quixote: Introduction and InterviewAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 3
B. Radin (2000)
The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform: Square Pegs in Round Holes?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10
Jason Foster, A. Mills, Terrance Weatherbee (2014)
History, field definition and management studies: the case of the New DealJournal of Management History, 20
Mie Augier, Kristian Kreiner (2000)
An Interview with James G. MarchJournal of Management Inquiry, 9
Johan Olsen (2001)
Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism, and the Study of PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 95
A. Mills, Terrance Weatherbee, Gabrielle Durepos (2014)
Reassembling Weber to reveal the-past-as-history in management and organization studiesOrganization, 21
L. Parker (1999)
Historiography for the new millennium: adventures in accounting and managementAccounting History, 4
C. Booth, M. Rowlinson (2006)
Management and organizational history: ProspectsManagement & Organizational History, 1
P. Clark, M. Rowlinson (2004)
The Treatment of History in Organisation Studies: Towards an ‘Historic Turn’?Business History, 46
J. March (1997)
Administrative Practice, Organization Theory, and Political Philosophy: Ruminations on the Reflections of John M. GausPS: Political Science & Politics, 30
Erik Eriksen (1987)
Symbols, Stratagems, and Legitimacy in Political Analysis*Scandinavian Political Studies, 10
Journal of Management History, 26
J. March, L. Sproull, M. Tamuz (1991)
Learning from samples of one or fewer*Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12
M. Rowlinson, J. Hassard, S. Decker (2014)
Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 39
Jessica Soedirgo, Aarie Glas (2020)
Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of KnowledgePS: Political Science & Politics, 53
The purpose of this paper is to examine March and Olsen’s 1983 study of American Government reorganization attempts between 1904 and 1980 in relation to three debates in management history scholarship. Can explorations of the past yield innovative interpretations of the present and future organizational activities? What is the role of multiple perspectives in understanding complex reality? How should management historians react to the differences in power held by various actors in historical scenarios and to the absence of documented evidence of the stances of many traditionally underrepresented groups?Design/methodology/approachThe paper analyzes March and Olsen’s 1983 historical study on federal government reorganizations in relation to twentieth-century political science/public administration scholarship from 1919 to the present showing the unique focus and conclusion of March and Olsen’s work. The paper relates this focus and conclusions to three management questions.FindingsThis analysis shows that March and Olsen’s interpretation of American reorganization has had a significant impact on the work of political scientists studying programs that did not exist in 1983; this impact suggests how historical scholarship can invigorate understanding of current programs. The analysis also gives evidence to support March and Olsen’s focus on the importance of considering multiple perspectives to interpret complex realities. The analysis concludes that despite March’s acknowledging the importance of anti-establishment scholarship, March and Olsen’s 1983 work did not explore the role of power differentials or the voices of the oppressed in government reorganizations.Originality/valueThe value of this paper is that it seeks to relate March and Olsen’s work to a scholarship domain where it has not often been considered. Management historians lament that their work and concerns have often been considered peripheral by the greater management field. By showing how a major management theorist such as March used historical analysis to further understanding of contemporary organizations the paper heightens the visibility and importance of management history work.
Journal of Management History – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 3, 2022
Keywords: James G. March; Government reorganizations; Management history; Critical theory; Constructivism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.