Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Oukil, Srikrishna Govindaluri (2017)
A systematic approach for ranking football players within an integrated DEA‐OWA frameworkManagerial and Decision Economics, 38
R. Yager (1993)
Families of OWA operatorsFuzzy Sets and Systems, 59
M. Mazdeh, Roozbeh Hesamamiri (2014)
Knowledge management reliability and its impact on organizational performance: An empirical studyProgram, 48
Mehdi Abbasi, M. Kaviani (2016)
Operational efficiency-based ranking framework using uncertain DEA methods: An application to the cement industry in IranManagement Decision, 54
G. Amin, Mohaddeseh Hajjami (2016)
Application of Optimistic and Pessimistic OWA and DEA Methods in Stock SelectionInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31
Jinpei Liu, Qin Xu, Huayou Chen, Ligang Zhou, Jiaming Zhu, Zhifu Tao (2019)
Group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on DEA and stochastic simulationNeural Computing and Applications, 31
G. Amin, M. Toloo (2007)
Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated modelComput. Ind. Eng., 52
S. Mehrabian, G. Jahanshahloo, M. Alirezaee, G. Amin (2000)
An Assurance Interval for the Non-Archimedean Epsilon in DEA ModelsOper. Res., 48
N. Adler, Lea Friedman, Z. Sinuany-Stern (2002)
Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis contextEur. J. Oper. Res., 140
T. Sexton, R. Silkman, A. Hogan (1986)
Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and ExtensionsNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986
Jinshan Ma (2019)
Generalised grey target decision method based on the Gini-Simpson index involving mixed attributes and uncertain numbersData Technol. Appl., 53
Xinwang Liu (2011)
A Review of the OWA Determination Methods: Classification and Some Extensions
G. Amin, M. Toloo (2004)
A polynomial-time algorithm for finding epsilon in DEA modelsComput. Oper. Res., 31
(2019)
Reserve Bank of India (RBI): statistical tables relating to banks in India
T. León, Nuria Ramón, José Ruiz, I. Sirvent (2014)
Using Induced Ordered Weighted Averaging (IOWA) Operators for Aggregation in Cross‐Efficiency EvaluationsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29
M. Sanei, S. Banihashemi (2014)
Selecting the Best of Portfolio Using OWA Operator Weights in Cross Efficiency-EvaluationInternational Scholarly Research Notices, 2014
Yingming Wang, K. Chin (2011)
The use of OWA operator weights for cross-efficiency aggregationOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 39
Ching-Hsue Cheng, Jing-Rong Chang (2006)
Mcdm Aggregation Model Using Situational Me-OWA and Me-Owga OperatorsInt. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst., 14
M. Farrell (1957)
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, 120
Yingming Wang, C. Parkan (2007)
A preemptive goal programming method for aggregating OWA operator weights in group decision makingInf. Sci., 177
M. O’Hagan (1988)
Aggregating Template Or Rule Antecedents In Real-time Expert Systems With Fuzzy Set LogicTwenty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2
Lei Chen, Yingming Wang, Yan-ping Huang (2019)
Cross-efficiency aggregation method based on prospect consensus processAnnals of Operations Research, 288
Yingming Wang, C. Parkan (2005)
A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weightsInf. Sci., 175
(2020)
National stock exchange (NSE): NIFTY bank index
Jinpei Liu, S. Fang, Huayou Chen (2020)
Multiplicative data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency and stochastic weight space acceptability analysis for group decision making with interval multiplicative preference relationsInf. Sci., 514
Patricia Moore (2007)
Measuring Library Performance: Principles and TechniquesProgram, 41
Marianela Carrillo, Jesús Jorge (2018)
Integrated approach for computing aggregation weights in cross-efficiency evaluationOperations Research Perspectives, 5
Jie Wu, Jiasen Sun, L. Liang (2012)
DEA cross-efficiency aggregation method based upon Shannon entropyInternational Journal of Production Research, 50
L. Liang, Jie Wu, W. Cook, Joe Zhu (2008)
Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluationInternational Journal of Production Economics, 113
Hong Lv, Haiqun Ma (2019)
Performance assessment and major trends in open government data research based on Web of Science dataData Technol. Appl., 53
Evangelia Triperina, G. Bardis, C. Sgouropoulou, I. Xydas, O. Terraz, G. Miaoulis (2018)
Visual-aided ontology-based ranking on multidimensional data: a case study in academiaData Technol. Appl., 52
Jolly Puri, S. Yadav (2014)
A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in IndiaExpert Syst. Appl., 41
ISRN Applied Mathematics, 4
A. Charnes, W. Cooper, E. Rhodes (1978)
Measuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2
A. Oukil (2019)
Embedding OWA under preference ranking for DEA cross‐efficiency aggregation: Issues and proceduresInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
Subhankar Das, A. Nayyar, Inderpal Singh (2019)
An assessment of forerunners for customer loyalty in the selected financial sector by SEM approach toward their effect on businessData Technol. Appl., 53
Huihui Liu, Yao-yao Song, Guo-liang Yang (2019)
Cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis based on prospect theoryEur. J. Oper. Res., 273
Thuy Nguyen (2018)
Simplifying the minimax disparity model for determining OWA weights in large-scale problemsArXiv, abs/1804.06331
A. Oukil, G. Amin (2015)
Maximum appreciative cross-efficiency in DEA: A new ranking methodComput. Ind. Eng., 81
Lei Chen, Y. Huang, Mei Li, Yingming Wang (2020)
Meta-frontier analysis using cross-efficiency method for performance evaluationEur. J. Oper. Res., 280
Manolis Kritikos (2017)
A full ranking methodology in data envelopment analysis based on a set of dummy decision making unitsExpert Syst. Appl., 77
Yingming Wang, K. Chin (2010)
A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extensionExpert Syst. Appl., 37
Wenli Liu, Yingming Wang (2018)
Ranking DMUs by using the upper and lower bounds of the normalized efficiency in data envelopment analysisComput. Ind. Eng., 125
R. Fullér, Péter Majlender (2001)
An Analytic Approach for Obtaining Maximal Entropy Owa Operator WeightsMathematics eJournal
J. Doyle, R. Green (1994)
Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and UsesJournal of the Operational Research Society, 45
Jae-Dong Hong, Ki-Young Jeong (2017)
Cross efficiency based heuristics to rank decision making units in data envelopment analysisComput. Ind. Eng., 111
Zeshui Xu (2005)
An overview of methods for determining OWA weightsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 20
Ali Emrouznejad, G. Amin (2010)
Improving minimax disparity model to determine the OWA operator weightsInf. Sci., 180
M. Salahi, Narges Torabi, Akbar Amiri (2016)
An optimistic robust optimization approach to common set of weights in DEAMeasurement, 93
Dong Guo, Jie Wu (2013)
A complete ranking of DMUs with undesirable outputs using restrictions in DEA modelsMath. Comput. Model., 58
M. Dursun, Nazli Göker (2019)
A 2-tuple integrated DEA-based approach for neuromarketing technology evaluationKybernetes, 48
A. Hatami-Marbini, A. Ebrahimnejad, S. Lozano (2017)
Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis using lexicographic multiobjective approachComput. Ind. Eng., 105
E. Zavadskas, Zenonas Turskis, Simona Kildiene (2014)
State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methodsTechnological and Economic Development of Economy, 20
A. Ali, L. Seiford (1993)
Computational Accuracy and Infinitesimals In Data Envelopment AnalysisInfor, 31
L. Liang, Yongjun Li, Shibing Li (2009)
Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the undesirable outputs and large dimensionality of data sets with PCAExpert Syst. Appl., 36
R. Yager (1988)
On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmakingIEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 18
Jianping Fan, Zi-Wei Guo, Meiqin Wu (2020)
An Improvement of DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation Based on BWM-TOPSISIEEE Access, 8
S. MirHassani, M. Alirezaee (2005)
An efficient approach for computing non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA based on integrated modelsAppl. Math. Comput., 166
G. Jahanshahloo, F. Lotfi, M. Khanmohammadi, M. Kazemimanesh, V. Rezaie (2010)
Ranking of units by positive ideal DMU with common weightsExpert Syst. Appl., 37
J. Merigó, A. Lafuente (2009)
The Induced Generalized OWA Operator
Yanbing Gong, Liangliang Dai, Na Hu (2016)
An extended minimax absolute and relative disparity approach to obtain the OWA operator weightsJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 31
Jolly Puri, S. Yadav (2013)
Performance evaluation of public and private sector banks in India using DEA approachInternational Journal of Operational Research, 18
Xiaohong Liu, Junfei Chu, Pengzhen Yin, Jiasen Sun (2017)
DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: a case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plantsJournal of Cleaner Production, 142
Guo-liang Yang, Jianbo Yang, Wen-bin Liu, Xiao-xuan Li (2013)
Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approachEur. J. Oper. Res., 231
This paper is focused on developing an integrated algorithmic approach named as data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision-making (DEA-MCDM) for ranking decision-making units (DMUs) based on cross-efficiency technique and subjective preference(s) of the decision maker.Design/methodology/approachSelf-evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA) lacks in discrimination power among DMUs. To fix this, a cross-efficiency technique has been introduced that ranks DMUs based on peer-evaluation. Different cross-efficiency formulations such as aggressive and benevolent and neutral are available in the literature. The existing ranking approaches fail to incorporate subjective preference of “one” or “some” or “all” or “most” of the cross-efficiency evaluation formulations. Therefore, the integrated framework in this paper, based on DEA and multicriteria decision-making (MCDM), aims to present a ranking approach to incorporate different cross-efficiency formulations as well as subjective preference(s) of decision maker.FindingsThe proposed approach has an advantage that each of the aggressive, benevolent and neutral cross-efficiency formulations contribute to select the best alternative among the DMUs in a MCDM problem. Ordered weighted averaging (OWA) aggregation is applied to aggregate final cross-efficiencies and to achieve complete ranking of the DMUs. This new approach is further illustrated and compared with existing MCDM approaches like simple additive weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to prove its validity in real situations.Research limitations/implicationsThe choice of cross-efficiency formulation(s) as per subjective preference of the decision maker and different orness levels lead to different aggregated scores and thus ranking of the DMUs accordingly. The proposed ranking approach is highly useful in real applications like R and D projects, flexible manufacturing systems, electricity distribution sector, banking industry, labor assignment and the economic environmental performances for ranking and benchmarking.Practical implicationsTo prove the practical applicability and robustness of the proposed integrated DEA-MCDM approach, it is applied to top twelve Indian banks in terms of three inputs and two outputs for the period 2018–2019. The findings of the study (1) ensure the impact of non-performing assets (NPAs) on the ranking of the selected banks and (2) are enormously valuable for the bank experts and policy makers to consider the impact of peer-evaluation and subjective preference(s) in formulating appropriate policies to improve performance and ranks of underperformed banks in competitive scenario.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study that has integrated both DEA and MCDM via OWA aggregation to present a ranking approach that can incorporate different cross-efficiency formulations and subjective preference(s) of the decision maker for ranking DMUs.
Data Technologies and Applications – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 25, 2020
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; Subjective preference; Degree of orness; OWA aggregation; Ranking DMUs; Cross-efficiency
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.