Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Miller (1982)
Evolution And Revolution: A Quantum View Of Structural Change In OrganizationsJournal of Management Studies, 19
K. Palepu (1985)
Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measureSouthern Medical Journal, 6
M. Hannan (1984)
Structural Inertia and Organizational ChangeThe Sociological Review, 49
Henry Mintzberg (1990)
The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic managementSouthern Medical Journal, 11
C. Lindblom (1959)
THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGHEmergence: Complexity and Organization, 19
Robert Hoskisson, Richard Johnson (1992)
Research notes and communications corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect on diversification strategy and R & D intensitySouthern Medical Journal, 13
Henry Mintzberg (1987)
The Strategy Concept I: Five Ps for StrategyCalifornia Management Review, 30
P. Simmonds (1990)
The combined diversification breadth and mode dimensions and the performance of large diversified firmsSouthern Medical Journal, 11
Heather Haveman (1992)
Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 37
H. Ansoff (1991)
Critique of Henry Mintzberg's ‘The design school: Reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’Southern Medical Journal, 12
Two views of organizational change dominate the management literature. The incremental view holds that organizations experience largescale strategic changes quite slowly while the revolutionary view proposes that organizations experience long periods of relatively little strategic variation punctuated by short, intense periods of major change. Commonalties among the two change theories provide the basis for a study of 101 businesses over a six year period. The research examines two theoretical implications change is bimodally and discretely distributed and skewed toward incremental strategic change, and firms undergoing revolutionary strategic change will be more likely to experience simultaneous changes on multiple organizational dimensions than firms undergoing incremental strategic change. Consistent with Proposition 1, it was found that change is skewed toward incremental, but also that change is unimodal and continuously distributed, contrary to Proposition 1. Contrary to Proposition 2, revolutionary change on multiple dimensions was found to be rare.
The International Journal of Organizational Analysis – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.