Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Goodchild, C. Booth, J. (forthcoming) Henneberry
A typology of impact fees: a review of alternatives for planning practice in Britain
A. Skaburskis (1991)
The design of development cost charge schedulesJournal of Property Research, 8
G. Halman
Developers contributions: the DOT back‐pedals
Charles Connerly (1988)
The Social Implications of Impact FeesJournal of The American Planning Association, 54
A. Skaburskis, M. Qadeer (1992)
An Empirical Estimation of the Price Effects of Development Impact FeesUrban Studies, 29
J. Rowan‐Robinson, M. Lloyd (1988)
The infrastructure lottery and the land development process, 5
J. Delafons (1990)
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AND OTHER DEVICES
B. Goodchild, J. Henneberry
Impact Fees for Planning
Barry Goodchild, C. Booth, J. Henneberry (1996)
Impact fees: a review of alternatives and their implications for planning practice in BritainTown Planning Review, 67
Charles Delaney, D. Hayward (1994)
Development contributions in Australia: Unresolved issuesJournal of Property Research, 11
Charles Delaney, Marc Smith (1989)
Impact Fees and the Price of New Housing: An Empirical StudyReal Estate Economics, 17
S. Bailey (1994)
User-charges for Urban ServicesUrban Studies, 31
Rowan‐Robinson, Lloyd
Land Development and the Infrastructure Lottery
Department of Transport
Developers’ Contribution to Highways Works
R. Kirwan (1989)
Finance for Urban Public InfrastructureUrban Studies, 26
R. Alterman
Exactions American style: the context for evaluation
J. Nicholas (1992)
On the Progression of Impact FeesJournal of The American Planning Association, 58
Grimley J.R. Eve
The Use of Planning Agreements
J. Nicholas, A. Nelson, J. Juergensmeyer (1991)
A PRACTITIONER'S GUIDE TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
L. Singell, J. Lillydahl (1990)
An Empirical Examination of the Effect of Impact Fees on the Housing MarketLand Economics, 66
Conran Roche, Davis Langdon & Everest Consultancy Group
Costs of residential development
P. Healey, M. Purdue, F. Ennis
Gains from Planning? Dealing with the Impacts of Development
There is increasing pressure to shift the financial burden of the provision of off‐site infrastructure and services from government to building producers and consumers. Some measures to achieve this end have already been introduced on a piecemeal basis. Examines the financial implications of impact fees for development. The amount of the fee levied on a particular development is determined by the fee system. Its effects on the economics of property development are determined by the financial structure of the development. There is no necessary equivalence between impact fees and the ability of schemes to bear them. The same dichotomy exists, by extension, in the property market as a whole. Any fee system based on actual infrastructure impact will produce charges whose pattern differs from that of market strength. Weak markets would be faced with much greater adjustment problems than strong markets. As a result, impact fees threaten to disrupt existing property market structures. Developers should be aware of the fundamental change in their operational environment which would ensue.
Journal of Property Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 1996
Keywords: Development; Economics; Impact fees; Finance; Property markets
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.