Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ciarán Murphy (2021)
‘Rising demand and decreasing resources’: Theorising the ‘cost of austerity’ as a barrier to social worker discretionJournal of Social Policy, 52
T. Evans (2016)
‘Street-level bureaucracy, management and the corrupted world of service’European Journal of Social Work, 19
(2008)
ABCs: national daily newspaper circulation November 2008
J. Devaney (2018)
The trouble with thresholds: Rationing as a rational choice in child and family social workChild & Family Social Work
J. Sebba, N. Luke, D. McNeish, A. Rees (2017)
Children’s Social Care Innovation Programme final evaluation report
D. Wastell, Susan White, K. Broadhurst, S. Peckover, A. Pithouse (2010)
Children's services in the iron cage of performance management : street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of ŠvejkismInternational Journal of Social Welfare, 19
J. Pearce (2017)
Preventing child sexual exploitation
Ciarán Murphy (2021)
A More ‘Child-Centred’ System? Child Protection Social Workers’ Willingness to Employ DiscretionBritish Journal of Social Work
C. Murphy (2019)
To what extent are frontline statutory social workers employing their discretion in the Post-Munro review world of child protection?
J. Leigh (2013)
Constructing professional identity in child protection social work: a comparative ethnography
E. Munro (2011b)
The Munro Review of Child Protection – final report: a child centred system
Stephen Hall (1996)
Open door and listening ear are best support for patientsBMJ, 313
Donald MacQueen (1964)
PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENTIFIC REALISMPhilosophical Books, 5
(1996)
► ► Forward.Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987), 10 42
J. Warner (2014)
‘Heads Must Roll’? Emotional Politics, the Press and the Death of Baby PBritish Journal of Social Work, 44
(2010)
Street-level bureaucracy
(2008)
We’ve had a raft of excuses and no apology
I. Butler (2015)
Child protection and moral panic
W. Olsen (2007)
Critical Realist Explorations in MethodologyMethodological Innovations, 2
House of Commons Debate, 487
(2008b)
Go now: a damning report will today prove these four social workers betrayed baby P. So far, they have clung on to their jobs. Have they no shame?
S. Houston (2001)
Beyond Social Constructionism: Critical Realism and Social WorkBritish Journal of Social Work, 31
E. Munro (2018)
Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning cultureChild & Family Social Work, 24
(2008a)
Blood on their hands: shocking case of baby P, killed by mum and lover, betrayed by scandal council
R. Jones (2011)
Baby P tragedy: Cameron’s culpability should not be overlooked
Rick Hood, Allie Goldacre, R. Grant, Ray Jones (2016)
Exploring Demand and Provision in English Child Protection ServicesBritish Journal of Social Work, 46
E. Munro (2009)
Managing Societal and Institutional Risk in Child ProtectionRisk Analysis, 29
B. Franklin, Nigel Parton (2001)
Press-ganged! Media reporting of social work and child abuse
S. Kempster, K. Parry (2014)
Critical realism and grounded theory
P. Ayre (2001)
Child Protection and the Media: Lessons from the Last Three DecadesBritish Journal of Social Work, 31
Ciarán Murphy (2021)
If It's Not on the System, Then It Hasn't Been Done: ‘Ofsted Anxiety Disorder’ as a Barrier to Social Worker DiscretionChild Abuse Review
Robert Labaree (2002)
The risk of ‘going observationalist’: negotiating the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observerQualitative Research, 2
E. Munro (2011a)
The Munro Review of Child Protection – interim report: the child’s journey
The backdrop to the Munro Review of Child Protection was a narrative propagated in the British national press, and perpetuated particularly by the then opposition Conservative Party, that the case of “Baby P” evidenced the English child protection system was “failing” and in need of reform. Subsequently, the review asserted that the system had become “over-bureaucratised” and “defensive” at the expense of social worker discretion in the interests of the individual child, highlighting the need for “radical reform”. This paper aims to report on the extent of, and continued barriers to, social worker discretion within the contemporary English child protection.Design/methodology/approachAs an ethnographic case study of a single English child protection team, the study used a sequential and iterative mixed method design, encompassing observation, document analysis, focus groups, questionnaire, interviews and “Critical Realist Grounded Theory”.FindingsThe study found that social worker discretion was continuing to be undermined by the “Baby P effect”; not only in the sense of increasing numbers of children within the system but also by the perpetual fear of being “named”, “blamed” and “shamed”, akin to Peter Connelly’s social workers.Originality/valueThe paper considers how discretion is manifested in contemporary child protection, especially in the context of the “child-centred” system envisaged by the Munro Review. It concludes that the British media and politicians have a continued role to play in reducing the risk associated with the social worker’s discretionary space.
Journal of Children s Services – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 17, 2022
Keywords: Social work; Media; Child protection; Discretion; Baby P effect; Munro Review
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.