Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Guest editorial: the early adolescence of entrepreneurship research

Guest editorial: the early adolescence of entrepreneurship research Guest editorial Guest editorial: the early adolescence of entrepreneurship research In what is arguably a seminal piece of scholarship Shane and Venkataraman (2000) posited entrepreneurship lacked a conceptual framework, thus limiting the breadth and depth of entrepreneurship research. Despite this limitation, they noted the real promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Since then, the number of scholars exploring entrepreneurship, from a diverse array of geographies (Kiggundu, 2002; Ogundana et al., 2021; Gomes et al., 2022; Pérez-Nordvedt and Fallatah, 2022), disciplines (Henry, 2021; Neumeyer et al., 2019a; Winkler et al.,2021) and perspectives (Bandera et al.,2021; Williamson et al.,2022; Souakri et al.,2022), has drastically risen. The net result is an explosion of entrepreneurship articles, journals and books on all matter of entrepreneurship, including topics on entrepreneurial intentions (Krueger et al., 2000; Fayolle and Liñan, 2014; McLarty et al., 2021), mindsets (Naumann, 2017; Lynch and Corbett, 2022; Pidduck et al., 2022), education (Neck and Greene, 2011; Mahto et al.,2018; Pittaway and Cope, 2007), ecosystems (Neumeyer et al., 2019a, 2019b; Fredin and Lidén, 2020) and various types of entrepreneurship including social and humane entrepreneurship (Certo and Miller, 2008; Kruse et al.,2021; Kim et al.,2021; Santos et al., 2021). The two most http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Management History Emerald Publishing

Guest editorial: the early adolescence of entrepreneurship research

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/guest-editorial-the-early-adolescence-of-entrepreneurship-research-mrUEUjSJ6f

References (35)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1751-1348
eISSN
1751-1348
DOI
10.1108/jmh-08-2022-297
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Guest editorial Guest editorial: the early adolescence of entrepreneurship research In what is arguably a seminal piece of scholarship Shane and Venkataraman (2000) posited entrepreneurship lacked a conceptual framework, thus limiting the breadth and depth of entrepreneurship research. Despite this limitation, they noted the real promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Since then, the number of scholars exploring entrepreneurship, from a diverse array of geographies (Kiggundu, 2002; Ogundana et al., 2021; Gomes et al., 2022; Pérez-Nordvedt and Fallatah, 2022), disciplines (Henry, 2021; Neumeyer et al., 2019a; Winkler et al.,2021) and perspectives (Bandera et al.,2021; Williamson et al.,2022; Souakri et al.,2022), has drastically risen. The net result is an explosion of entrepreneurship articles, journals and books on all matter of entrepreneurship, including topics on entrepreneurial intentions (Krueger et al., 2000; Fayolle and Liñan, 2014; McLarty et al., 2021), mindsets (Naumann, 2017; Lynch and Corbett, 2022; Pidduck et al., 2022), education (Neck and Greene, 2011; Mahto et al.,2018; Pittaway and Cope, 2007), ecosystems (Neumeyer et al., 2019a, 2019b; Fredin and Lidén, 2020) and various types of entrepreneurship including social and humane entrepreneurship (Certo and Miller, 2008; Kruse et al.,2021; Kim et al.,2021; Santos et al., 2021). The two most

Journal

Journal of Management HistoryEmerald Publishing

Published: Nov 24, 2022

There are no references for this article.