Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Senge, J. Sterman (1992)
Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the futureEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 59
P. Schoemaker, C. Heijden (1992)
Integrating scenarios into strategic planning at Royal Dutch/Shell, 20
W. Starbuck (1992)
Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms
P. Senge (1989)
Organizational Learning: A New Challenge for System Dynamics
Z. Sinuany-Stern, A. Mehrez, A. Barboy (1994)
Academic departments efficiency via DEAComput. Oper. Res., 21
R. Pascale (1994)
Intentional breakdowns and conflict by design, 22
Eppen Gd, Hanson Wa, Martin Rk (1991)
Bundling--new products, new markets, low risk.Sloan Management Review, 32
Fred Kofman, P. Senge (1993)
Communities of commitment: The heart of learning organizationsOrganizational Dynamics, 22
K. Weick (1969)
The social psychology of organizing
M. McGill, J. Slocum (1993)
Unlearning the organizationOrganizational Dynamics, 22
P. Milling, E. Zahn (1989)
Computer-Based Management of Complex Systems
Michael Epstein, J. Henderson (1989)
Data Envelopment Analysis for Managerial Control and DiagnosisDecision Sciences, 20
P. Schoemaker (1993)
MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATIONSouthern Medical Journal, 14
I. Kleinsorge, P. Schary, R. Tanner (1992)
Data Envelopment Analysis for monitoring customer-supplier relationshipsJournal of Accounting and Public Policy, 11
P. Cappelli, Nikolai Rogovsky (1994)
New Work Systems and Skill Requirements.International Labour Review, 133
M. Maccoby (1993)
What Should Learning Organizations LearnResearch-technology Management, 36
D. Epple, L. Argote, R. Devadas (1991)
Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by DoingOrganization Science, 2
A. Bandura (1977)
Social learning theoryCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 2
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
M. Schefczyk (1993)
Operational performance of airlines: An extension of traditional measurement paradigmsSouthern Medical Journal, 14
F. Luthans, D. Kessler (1993)
Meeting the New Paradigm Challenges through Total Quality Management, 34
V. Cangelosi, W. Dill (1965)
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: OBSERVATIONS TOWARD A THEORY,Administrative Science Quarterly, 10
V. Pina, L. Torres (1992)
EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS: AN APPLICATION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICEFinancial Accountability and Management, 8
J. Sullivan, I. Nonaka (1986)
The Application of Organizational Learning Theory to Japanese and American ManagementJournal of International Business Studies, 17
M. Maccoby (1993)
The Human Side: What Should Learning Organizations Learn?Research-technology Management, 36
G. Huber (1991)
Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the LiteraturesOrganization Science, 2
A. Lewin, J. Minton (1986)
Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for researchManagement Science, 32
M. McGill, J. Slocum, D. Lei (1992)
Management practices in learning organizationsOrganizational Dynamics, 21
R. Hodgetts, F. Luthans, Sang Lee (1994)
New paradigm organizations: From total quality to learning to world-classOrganizational Dynamics, 22
C. Argyris (1993)
On organizational learning
M. Kiernan (1993)
The new strategic architecture: Learning to compete in the twenty-first centuryAcademy of Management Perspectives, 7
P. Senge, A. Kleiner, C. Roberts (1994)
The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook
F. Malerba (1992)
Learning by Firms and Incremental Technical ChangeThe Economic Journal, 102
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
A. Charnes, W. Cooper, E. Rhodes (1978)
Measuring the efficiency of decision making unitsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2
Bent Bakken (1989)
Learning in dynamic simulation games; using performance as a measure
R. Thompson, Euntaik Lee, R. Thrall (1992)
DEA/AR-efficiency of U.S. independent oil/gas producers over timeComput. Oper. Res., 19
Fiol C. M. (1985)
10.5465/amr.1985.4279103Academy of Management Review, 10
Dan Dimancescu (1992)
The Seamless Enterprise: Making Cross-Functional Management Work
B. Dumaine (1994)
Mr. Learning Organization.Fortune, 130
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (1995)
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
R. Pascale (1990)
Managing on the Edge
G. Morgan, R. Ramírez (1984)
Action Learning: A Holographic Metaphor for Guiding Social ChangeHuman Relations, 37
I. Nonaka, J. Johansson (1985)
Japanese Management: What About the “Hard” Skills?Academy of Management Review, 10
E. Thanassoulis (1993)
A Comparison of Regression Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis as Alternative Methods for Performance AssessmentsJournal of the Operational Research Society, 44
K. Cameron (1986)
Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational EffectivenessManagement Science, 32
H. Shepard (1967)
Innovation-Resisting and Innovation-Producing OrganizationsThe Journal of Business, 40
C. Argyris (1993)
Education for leading-learningOrganizational Dynamics, 21
C. Argyris, Donald Schön (1978)
Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective
Daniel Kim (1989)
Learning Laboratories: Designing a Reflective Learning Environment
F. Taylor, 马 风才 (2014)
科学管理原理=The principles of scientific management
Daniel Kim (1997)
The Link between individual and organizational learningSloan Management Review
M. Maccoby (1993)
The Human Side: To Create Quality, First Create the CultureResearch-technology Management, 36
H. Simon (1960)
The new science of management decision
C. Brown, B. Sulzer-Azaroff (1994)
An Assessment of the Relationship Between Customer Satisfaction and Service FriendlinessJournal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14
D. Ulrich, T. Jick, M. Glinow (1993)
High-impact learning: Building and diffusing learning capabilityOrganizational Dynamics, 22
Stephen Haag, P. Jaska, J. Semple (1992)
Assessing the relative efficiency of agricultural production units in the Blackland Prairie, TexasApplied Economics, 24
The popular total quality management TQM approach has tended to focus on internal processes, rather than external issues such as competitiveness and market appeal, and is more reactive and adaptive than anticipative. The time has come to go beyond TQM and to understand the nature and application of organizational learning. Learning organizations envision change, are committed to generating and transferring new knowledge and innovation, and have learned how to learn. TQM may be embedded in the learning organization, but TQM is but the first step or wave in transforming and creating organizations which continuously expand their abilities to change and shape their futures. This article first defines and identifies the characteristics of a learning organization, then explores some techniques to develop and transform an organization into a learning organization, and finally suggests some traditional and newer techniques, such as data envelopment analysis DEA, as ways to measure and evaluate organizational learning.
The International Journal of Organizational Analysis – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.