Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of peer researchers in participant observation.Design/methodology/approachThe research involved interviews with 11 fieldworkers aged 18–25 years.FindingsThe method improves access to settings and provides useful context information on participants.Research limitations/implicationsIt is a useful method in situations where normal access to participants and settings is problematic.Originality/valueThe paper is the first ever evaluation of supervised peer research (as opposed to peer-led research).
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 18, 2019
Keywords: Ethnography; Participant observation; Peer research; Alcohol research
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.