Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Yucheng Zhang, Zhenyu Liao (2015)
Consequences of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic reviewAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 32
B. Tepper, M. Duffy, Jenny Hoobler, Michael Ensley (2004)
Moderators of the relationships between coworkers' organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 3
S. Aryee, Z. Chen, Li‐Yun Sun, Y. Debrah (2007)
Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 1
Karl Aquino, Margaret Lewis, Murray Bradfield (1999)
Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical testJournal of Organizational Behavior, 20
Huiwen Lian, D. Ferris, Rachel Morrison, Douglas Brown (2014)
Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance.The Journal of applied psychology, 99 4
B. Schyns, Jan Schilling (2013)
How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomesLeadership Quarterly, 24
Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1
D. Skarlicki, R. Folger (1997)
RETALIATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE ROLES OF DISTRIBUTIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND INTERACTIONAL JUSTICEJournal of Applied Psychology, 82
Chinese Journal of Psychology, 50
C. Strenger, Jacob Burak (2005)
The Leonardo effect: why entrepreneurs become their own fathersInternational Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2
Sajeet Pradhan, L. Jena (2018)
Emotional intelligence as a moderator in abusive supervision-intention to quit relationship among Indian healthcare professionalsAsia-pacific Journal of Business Administration, 10
M. Hershcovis, Nick Turner, J. Barling, Kara Arnold, Kathryne Dupré, Michelle Inness, M. Leblanc, Niro Sivanathan (2007)
Predicting workplace aggression: a meta-analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 1
R. Brislin (1970)
Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural ResearchJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
Huiwen Lian, D. Ferris, Douglas Brown (2012)
Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational devianceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117
A. Gouldner (1960)
THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT *American Sociological Review, 25
R. Bennett, S. Robinson (2003)
The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research.
Sajeet Pradhan, L. Jena (2017)
Effect of abusive supervision on employee’s intention to quit and the neutralizing role of meaningful work in Indian IT organizationsInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 25
B. Tepper, Christine Henle, L. Lambert, R. Giacalone, M. Duffy (2008)
Abusive supervision and subordinates' organization deviance.The Journal of applied psychology, 93 4
Mark Martinko, P. Harvey, Jeremy Brees, J. Mackey (2013)
A review of abusive supervision researchJournal of Organizational Behavior, 34
B. Tepper, M. Duffy, Christine Henle, L. Lambert (2006)
PROCEDURAL INJUSTICE, VICTIM PRECIPITATION, AND ABUSIVE SUPERVISIONPersonnel Psychology, 59
B. Tepper (2000)
Consequences of Abusive SupervisionAcademy of Management Journal, 43
A. Zhang, A. Tsui, Duanxu Wang (2011)
Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes ☆ ☆☆Leadership Quarterly, 22
M. Duffy, D. Ganster, Milan Pagon (2002)
Social Undermining in the WorkplaceAcademy of Management Journal, 45
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, Nathan Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 5
(2006)
What are micro, small & medium enterprises?
S. Mulaik, Larry James, Judith Alstine, Nathan Bennett, Sherri Lind, C. Stilwell (1989)
EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELSPsychological Bulletin, 105
T. Tripp, R. Bies, Karl Aquino (2002)
Poetic justice or petty jealousy? The aesthetics of revengeOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89
Karl Aquino, S. Douglas (2003)
Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical statusOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90
R. Bennett, S. Robinson (2000)
Development of a measure of workplace deviance.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 3
H. Aaron, W. Schwartz (1985)
Hospital cost control: a bitter pill to swallow.Harvard business review, 63 2
E. Lawler (1986)
Bilateral Deterrence and Conflict Spiral: A Theoretical Analysis
J. Miner (2000)
Testing a Psychological Typology of Entrepreneurship Using Business FoundersThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36
B. Tepper, S. Moss, Daniel Lockhart, J. Carr (2007)
Abusive Supervision, Upward Maintenance Communication, and Subordinates' Psychological DistressAcademy of Management Journal, 50
Ethan Burris, J. Detert, Dan Chiaburu (2008)
Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice.The Journal of applied psychology, 93 4
R. Bies, T. Tripp (1996)
Beyond distrust: "Getting even" and the need for revenge.
B. Tepper, J. Carr, Denise Breaux, S. Geider, Changya Hu, W. Hua (2009)
Abusive supervision, intentions to quit, and employees' workplace deviance: A power/dependence analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109
Stefan Thau, R. Bennett, Marie Mitchell, M. Marrs (2009)
How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108
D. Ganster (2008)
Measurement challenges for studying work-related stressors and strainsHuman Resource Management Review, 18
Christopher Berry, D. Ones, P. Sackett (2007)
Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: a review and meta-analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 2
Marie Mitchell, Maureen Ambrose (2007)
Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 4
Dawn Carlson, Merideth Ferguson, Emily Hunter, D. Whitten (2012)
Abusive supervision and work-family conflict: The path through emotional labor and burnoutLeadership Quarterly, 23
E. Xu, Xu Huang, Catherine Lam, Q. Miao (2012)
Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMXJournal of Organizational Behavior, 33
Wenxing Liu, Pengcheng Zhang, Jianqiao Liao, P. Hao, Jianghua Mao (2016)
Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identificationManagement Decision, 54
J. Mackey, R. Frieder, P. Perrewé, V. Gallagher, R. Brymer (2015)
Empowered Employees as Social Deviants: The Role of Abusive SupervisionJournal of Business and Psychology, 30
Kathryne Dupré, Michelle Inness, C. Connelly, J. Barling, Colette Hoption (2006)
Workplace aggression in teenage part-time employees.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 5
Karl Aquino, T. Tripp, R. Bies (2006)
Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 3
Patricia Meglich, Dale Eesley (2011)
A "Bully" in its Own China Shop: Risk Factors for Abusive Supervision in Small Firms
(2013)
Empirical evidence of abusive supervision in entrepreneurial and small firms
Anders Sjöberg, Magnus Sverke (2000)
The interactive effect of job involvement and organizational commitment on job turnover revisited: a note on the mediating role of turnover intention.Scandinavian journal of psychology, 41 3
Loraleigh Keashly (1997)
Emotional Abuse in the Workplace.Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1
Susan Stewart, M. Bing, H. Davison, D. Woehr, Michael McIntyre (2009)
In the eyes of the beholder: A non-self-report measure of workplace deviance.The Journal of applied psychology, 94 1
B. Tepper (2007)
Abusive Supervision in Work Organizations: Review, Synthesis, and Research AgendaJournal of Management, 33
Sajeet Pradhan, L. Jena (2016)
The Moderating Role of Neutralizers on the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Intention to Quit: A Proposed ModelJournal of Human Values, 22
R. Eisenberger, Florence Stinglhamber, C. Vandenberghe, I. Sucharski, Linda Rhoades (2002)
Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 3
K. Vries, F. Manfred (1985)
The Dark Side of Entrepreneurship
Stefan Thau, Marie Mitchell (2010)
Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice.The Journal of applied psychology, 95 6
T. Tyler, E. Lind (1992)
A Relational Model of Authority in GroupsAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25
Blake Ashforth (2009)
Petty Tyranny in Organizations: A Preliminary Examination of Antecedents and ConsequencesCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration, 14
P. Podsakoff, Scott MacKenzie, Nathan Podsakoff (2012)
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.Annual review of psychology, 63
S. Robinson, R. Bennett (1997)
Workplace deviance: Its definition, its manifestations, and its causes.
Kelly Zellars, B. Tepper, M. Duffy (2002)
Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 6
Unlike most empirical investigations that have tested the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinate’s workplace deviance in a large and formal organizational setup, this study investigates the effect of abusive behavior of owner-manager of small entrepreneurial establishments on subordinate’s workplace deviance. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, it explores the moderating effect of intention to quit on the relationship between abusive supervision and organizational as well as interpersonal deviance; and second, it investigates whether the moderating effect between abusive supervision and intention to quit will be stronger for organizational deviance (supervisor directed) than for interpersonal deviance (others directed).Design/methodology/approachThe participants of this study were 240 restaurant and hotel employees working in three small entrepreneurial organizations in the eastern state of India. The authors have collected data on the predictor and criterion variables at two time points with a separation of three to four weeks for reducing common method bias (Podsakoff et al., 2012). At Time 1, participants completed measures of the perception of their owner-manager’s abusiveness and their intention to quit. At Time 2, participants responded to organizational deviance and interpersonal deviance.FindingsThe findings of the study is in line with previous research studies (Tepper et al., 2007; Thau et al., 2009) that reported intention to quit will moderate the positive relationship between abusive supervision and organizational deviance and interpersonal deviance such that the relationship will be stronger when intention to quit is high rather than low. The finding of the study also corroborates the prediction that the interactive effect between abusive supervision and intention to quit will be stronger for organizational deviance (supervisor directed) than for interpersonal deviance (aimed at other members of the organization) when intention to quit is higher.Originality/valueThis study is among the very few empirical research studies that have investigated the effect of abusiveness of owner-manager on subordinate’s workplace deviance in small organizations. Another unique aspect of the study is that it is one of few to propose and test, how (whether organizational deviance or/and interpersonal deviance) and to what extent (more organizational or supervisor directed than interpersonal or others directed deviance) subordinates of abusive supervisor retaliate by engaging in workplace deviant behaviors.
South Asian Journal of Business Studies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 4, 2019
Keywords: India; Abusive supervision; Intention to quit; Interpersonal deviance; Organizational deviance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.