Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ge-whiz! How students choose their general education classes

Ge-whiz! How students choose their general education classes The purpose of this paper is to understand how students choose their general education elective courses.Design/methodology/approachA survey was given to 12,000 undergraduate students at Utah Valley University (UVU) that asked about how they selected distribution courses to fulfill the requirements for the general education. UVU offers 113 different courses in the general education distribution area, but only six are needed to meet the requirements. Students were asked to both select all methods that they used and then to rank their selected methods. The results were analyzed using χ2 methods.Findings“Personal interest” and “What best fit my schedule” were the top choices and where chosen as a method used by 69 and 67 percent of the students respectively. When asked to rank the methods, “Personal interest” ranked first most frequently at 32 percent and “What best fits my schedule” was ranked first by 29 percent of students. The results indicate that although personal interest is the most used method for choosing these classes, it does not dominate, and schedule remains a significant factor for students at UVU.Originality/valueThe data provide a look into the perceptions and attitudes of students at what is predominately a commuter school. This research provides the first step in understanding student motives in selecting elective classes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education Emerald Publishing

Ge-whiz! How students choose their general education classes

Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/ge-whiz-how-students-choose-their-general-education-classes-a5cRaG1SQT
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2050-7003
DOI
10.1108/jarhe-09-2017-0106
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to understand how students choose their general education elective courses.Design/methodology/approachA survey was given to 12,000 undergraduate students at Utah Valley University (UVU) that asked about how they selected distribution courses to fulfill the requirements for the general education. UVU offers 113 different courses in the general education distribution area, but only six are needed to meet the requirements. Students were asked to both select all methods that they used and then to rank their selected methods. The results were analyzed using χ2 methods.Findings“Personal interest” and “What best fit my schedule” were the top choices and where chosen as a method used by 69 and 67 percent of the students respectively. When asked to rank the methods, “Personal interest” ranked first most frequently at 32 percent and “What best fits my schedule” was ranked first by 29 percent of students. The results indicate that although personal interest is the most used method for choosing these classes, it does not dominate, and schedule remains a significant factor for students at UVU.Originality/valueThe data provide a look into the perceptions and attitudes of students at what is predominately a commuter school. This research provides the first step in understanding student motives in selecting elective classes.

Journal

Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 19, 2018

Keywords: General education; Higher education; Student choice; Student perceptions

References

  • Attitude changes of undergraduate university students in general education courses
    Anderson, M.
  • Includes R source code and/or documentation written by Dirk Enzmann
    Aquino, J.
  • Coherence in general education: a historical look
    Boning, K.
  • Matching the purpose of the general education curriculum with the reality of its implementation
    Cottrell, L.
  • A strategy for using student perceptions in the assessment of general education
    Feldman, M.J.
  • Assessment of general education
    Furman, T.
  • Vocationalism in higher education: the triumph of the education gospel
    Grubb, N.W.; Lazerson, M.
  • Out out, damned spot: general education in a market-driven institution
    Harris, M.S.
  • The demand side of general education: attending to student attitudes and understandings
    Johnston, J.S.; Reardon, R.C.; Kramer, G.L.
  • ‘Why do I have to take this course?’ How academic advisers can help students find personal meaning and purpose in general education
    Kirk-Kuwaye, M.; Sano-Franchini, D.
  • Faculty perceptions of general education and the use of high-impact practices
    Paulson, K.
  • Report of the task force on general education
  • Student perceptions of general education requirements at a large public university: no surprises?
    Thompson, C.A.; Eodice, M.; Tran, P.
  • Student perspectives on general education in a research university exploratory study
    Twombly, S.B.
  • General education: an academic adviser’s perspective
    White, E.R.
  • Reframing general education
    Zai, R.
  • Creating coherence in general education curricula: lessons from interdisciplinary junior/senior clusters
    MacDougall, J