Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Hong Zhu, Qi Zhu (2016)
Mergers and acquisitions by Chinese firms: A review and comparison with other mergers and acquisitions research in the leading journalsAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 33
Sanjai Bhagat, Shavin Malhotra, Peng Zhu (2011)
Emerging Country Cross-Border Acquisitions: Characteristics, Acquirer Returns and Cross-Sectional DeterminantsCorporate Governance: Comparative eJournal
P. Healy, K. Palepu, Richard Ruback (1990)
Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?Management Practice
(2018)
Aufkaufen und ausschlachten
B. Park, Taewoo Roh (2019)
Chinese multinationals’ FDI motivations: suggestion for a new theoryInternational Journal of Emerging Markets
K. Edamura, Shoko Haneda, T. Inui, Xiaofei Tan, Y. Todo (2014)
Impact of Chinese cross-border outbound M&As on firm performance: Econometric analysis using firm-level dataChina Economic Review, 30
Dirk Holtbrügge, Sue Berning (2018)
Market Entry Strategies and Performance of Chinese Firms in Germany: The Moderating Effect of Home Government SupportManagement International Review, 58
(2010)
M&A for value Creation: the experience in Thailand
S. Grigorieva, T. Petrunina (2015)
The performance of mergers and acquisitions in emerging capital markets: new angleJournal of Management Control, 26
(2020)
China business upgrade.de
Journal of Financial Economics, 31
Fredrik Utesch-Xiong (2021)
China's OFDI policy announcements and cross-border M&AInternational Journal of Emerging Markets
(2018)
KUKA and Midea strengthen cooperation in China
(2020)
Neue studie befeuert debatte: nutzt china corona, um sich die Perlen der deutschen Wirtschaft zu greifen?Business Insider
Xiaobai Ma, Yiying Zhu, Wenyuan Cai (2016)
The performance of cross-border acquirers from emerging economiesNankai Business Review International, 7
(2003)
What is an SME?
Emerging Markets Review, 12
Qian Wang, A. Boateng (2008)
Cross-Border M&As by Chinese Firms: An Analysis of Strategic Motivation and PerformanceInternational Management Review, 3
Yu Chen, Herbert Werle, R. Moser (2018)
Critical success factors in Chinese cross-border mergers and acquisitionsNankai Business Review International
H. Tan, Qi Ai (2010)
China's outward mergers and acquisitions in the 21st century: motivations, progress and the role of the Chinese government, 9
(1988)
The efficiency effects of hostile takeovers
International Journal of Finance & Economics, ahead-of-print
Kai Bollhorn (2015)
Acquisitions of German companies by Chinese and Indian corporations – a threat to employment and knowledge retention?DIE ERDE – Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 146
(2011)
Annual Report
Bülent Aybar, A. Ficici (2009)
Cross-border acquisitions and firm value: An analysis of emerging-market multinationalsJournal of International Business Studies, 40
(2019)
Financial statements, ownership structure, ownership history
(2018)
Bei Kuka geht die Angst um
Xi Lin, Yi-Na Li, Xiaolan Wan, Jiuchang Wei (2020)
Market reaction to the international acquisitions by Chinese firmsChinese Management Studies, 14
Yipeng Liu, M. Woywode (2010)
Chinese M&A in Germany: the Light-Touch Integration and a Theoretical Explanation Based on Absorptive Capacity
Xinming Xia, Wanxin Liu (2021)
China’s Investments in Germany and the Impact of the COVID-19 PandemicInter Economics, 56
T. Kiessling, Michael Harvey (2006)
The human resource management issues during an acquisition: the target firm's top management team and key managersThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17
The purpose of this study is to look at Chinese mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in Germany on a firm level. It focuses on the benefits and risks from the viewpoint of Germany. In this way, the authors want to close the research gap concerning the financial consequences of Chinese takeovers for the affected German firms. The purpose is to find out if Chinese investors show a specific behavior in terms of profitability, growth and business risks in the acquired companies.Design/methodology/approachThis paper studies the financial situation of German firms two years before and two years after being bought by Chinese companies, by analyzing accounting data of 19 target companies in six economic sectors. In this empirical study, firm performance is measured by profitability, research and development cost, liquidity and financial leverage. It is using the industry adjustment method and calculation of mean and weighted mean considering company size.FindingsOverall, German firms’ financial performance after Chinese M&A did not significantly improve, but they did not worsen either. The changes in financial ratios are different across economic sectors and company sizes. Obviously, the final performance of firms after M&A is quite diverse due to diverse company-specific targets. The results do not reflect common fears about deteriorating situations brought by Chinese involvement drawn in mass media.Research limitations/implicationsThe study lacks analysis for a longer period, ideally five years before and five years after M&A. The calculated results of industry mean may differ from the real industry mean, as components are collected from the sample companies accounting for only 70% of the market. Industry means figures are calculated for only one single point in time and assumed to be unchanged over the whole time period. The study covers mostly firms which have total assets of more than €50m, so SMEs are underrepresented.Practical implicationsOwners of German firms that are in target but have not been purchased by Chinese investors can see the trends and anticipate which group of M&A targets their firms are categorized into. If their firms belong to the group of sectors or company sizes that shows negative results of performance after Chinese M&A, they can plan to protect their firms by implementing defending strategies against hostile takeovers. If their firms are in the groups that tend to enhance performance after Chinese M&A, they may be in a good position and able to negotiate for mutually beneficial transactions.Social implicationsThe results are important for political and public discussion. It is shown that Chinese acquisitions of German firms do not have a deteriorating effect, at least not in the short-term. Therefore, the results are a good input to neutralize discussions in German society.Originality/valueThe results disagree with the few previous studies on Chinese M&A in Germany (Bollhorn, 2015; Müller, 2017; Löchel and Sächtig, 2019). While the studies of Bollhorn and Müller are based on subjective methods, the study is based on a detailed financial method. Then, in contrast to the study of Löchel and Sächtig, it is strictly focusing on Chinese/German M&A. Most existing empirical studies are focusing on cross-border M&As from developed to developing countries and there is little attention to acquisitions in the other direction (Ma et al., 2016, p. 22).
Review of International Business and Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 2, 2022
Keywords: Financial performance; Post-merger integration; Chinese M&A; China Germany; M&A effects
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.