Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Iivari, K. Lyytinen (1998)
Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in pluralityScandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10
E. Mumford (1979)
Consensus Systems Design: An Evaluation of this Approach
P. Kerola, A. Juustila, J. Järvinen, J. Kaasbøll, Leikny Øgrim (1994)
Super-users: Hackers, Management Hostages, or Working Class Heroes? a Study of User Influence on Redesign in Distributed Organizations
M. Kyng (1996)
Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifactsScand. J. Inf. Syst., 10
E. Mumford (1983)
Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method
Cowie James (1999)
Special issue on action research.Language Teaching, 23
F. Land (2000)
Evaluation in a Socio-technical Context
G. Olson, J. Olson (1991)
User‐centered design of collaboration technologyJournal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 1
P. Beynon-Davies (2007)
Models for e‐governmentTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1
C. Hood (1991)
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONSPublic Administration, 69
(2009)
Focus on Citizens: Public Engagement for better Policy and Services, OECD Studies on Public Engagement
(2009)
Approved unanimously in Malmö
J. Baumgarten, M. Chui
Perspectives on public‐sector productivity and operations
T. Lynch, S. Gregor (2004)
User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomesEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 13
K. Schedler, Lukas Summermatter (2007)
Customer orientation in electronic government: Motives and effectsGov. Inf. Q., 24
Gro Bjerknes, P. Ehn, M. Kyng, K. Nygaard (1987)
Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge
Steve Jones, R. Hackney, Z. Irani (2007)
Towards e‐government transformation: conceptualising “citizen engagement”: A research noteTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1
(2009)
McKinsey on Government, Perspectives on public-sector productivity and operations
Jesper Simonsen (2009)
A Concern for Engaged Scholarship: The challenges for action research projectsScand. J. Inf. Syst., 21
J. Gulliksen, B. Göransson, I. Boivie, Stefan Blomkvist, Jenny Persson, Å. Cajander (2003)
Key principles for user-centred systems designBehaviour & Information Technology, 22
(2005)
The Norwegian Government's Policy for the Information Society
D. Howcroft, Melanie Wilson (2003)
Participation: 'Bounded Freedom' or Hidden Constraints on User InvolvementNew Technology Work and Employment, 18
(2007)
The Danish E-government Strategy Towards better digital service, increased efficiency and stronger collaboration, The Danish Government, LGDK and Danish Regions
(2006)
eParticipation in policy-making: the research and the challenges
Øystein Sæbø, J. Rose, L. Flak (2008)
The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research areaGov. Inf. Q., 25
M. Myers (2008)
Qualitative Research in Business & Management
C. Floyd, Wolf-Michael Mehl, Fanny-Michaela Reisin, G. Schmidt, Gregor Wolf (1989)
Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System DevelopmentHum. Comput. Interact., 4
A. Oostveen, P. Besselaar (2004)
From small scale to large scale participatory design: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems.
Richard Heeks
Development Informatics Working Paper Series the Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects the Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects
Gro Bjerknes, Tone Bratteteig (1995)
User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System DevelopmentScand. J. Inf. Syst., 7
Steve Hickey, H. Matthies, E. Mumford (2006)
Designing Human Systems
D. Schuler, A. Namioka (1993)
Participatory Design: Principles and Practices
R. Baskerville, J. Stage, Janice Degross (2013)
Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology
K. Andersen, H. Henriksen, Christine Secher, R. Medaglia (2007)
Costs of e‐participation: the management challengesTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1
(2001)
An Overview of the
F. Kensing, Jeanette Blomberg (2004)
Participatory Design: Issues and ConcernsComputer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7
(2004)
Vem styr den elektroniska förvaltningen?, RIR 2004:19, Riksrevisionen, Stockholm. (Who is in control of the electronic government?)
D. Avison, R. Baskerville, M. Myers (2001)
Controlling action research projectsInf. Technol. People, 14
G. Goldkuhl (2007)
What does it mean to serve the citizen in e-services? - Towards a practical theory founded in socio-instrumental pragmatismInternational Journal of Public Information Systems, 3
R. Baskerville, T. Wood-Harper (1996)
A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems researchJournal of Information Technology, 11
G. Goldkuhl (2006)
What does it mean to serve the citizen? - Towards a practical theory on public e-services founded in socio-instrumental pragmatism
Annelie Ekelin (2003)
Working with the Fogbow: Design and Reconfiguration of services and Participation in E-Government
M. Kamal (2009)
An analysis of e‐Participation research: moving from theoretical to pragmatic viewpointTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3
K. Axelsson, U. Melin (2007)
Talking to, Not About, Citizens - Experiences of Focus Groups in Public E-Service Development
C. Reddick (2005)
Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?Gov. Inf. Q., 22
R. Baskerville, M. Myers (2004)
Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems: Making is Research Relevant to PracticeThe University of Auckland Business School Research Paper Series
C. Beath, W. Orlikowski (1994)
The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information EngineeringInf. Syst. Res., 5
P. Ehn (1992)
Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill
S. King (2007)
Citizens as customers: Exploring the future of CRM in UK local governmentGov. Inf. Q., 24
D. Howcroft, Melanie Wilson (2003)
Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developerInf. Organ., 13
A. Cavaye (1995)
User participation in system development revisitedInf. Manag., 28
G. Walsham (2006)
Doing interpretive researchEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 15
Richard Heeks, J. Andrade (2005)
Implementing And Managing Egovernment: An International Text
Leonidas Anthopoulos, Panagiotis Siozos, Ioannis Tsoukalas (2007)
Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government servicesGov. Inf. Q., 24
(2008)
eGovernment Action Plan, drafted by the eGroup and the State Secretary Group for eGovernment Coordination, Annexe 1 of Government Decision 17
Asbjørn Følstad, H. Jørgensen, J. Krogstie (2004)
User involvement in e-government development projects
C. Folkerd, G. Spinelli (2009)
User exclusion and fragmented requirements capture in publicly‐funded IS projectsTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3
J. McKeen, T. Guimaraes (1997)
Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems DevelopmentJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 14
F. Heller (1998)
Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality
(2009)
Canada's e-Government strategy Ministry of Government Services
Miriam Green (2000)
Organizational Participation: Myth and RealityJournal of Managerial Psychology, 15
D. Avison, T. Wood-Harper (1991)
Information Systems Development Research: An Exploration of Ideas in PracticeComput. J., 34
M. Newman, F. Noble (1990)
User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case StudyInf. Syst. Res., 1
A. Oostveen, P. Besselaar (2004)
From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems
J. Hartwick, H. Barki (1994)
Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System UseManagement Science, 40
New Zealand's e-government strategy. Networking government in New Zealand: http://www.e.govt.nz/about-egovt/strategy
F. Fischer (2000)
Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge
Thomas Butler, Brian Fitzgerald (1997)
A case study of user participation in the information systems development process
L. Damodaran, John Nicholls, A. Henney, F. Land, Barbara, Farbey (2005)
The Contribution of Sociotechnical Systems Thinking to the Effective Adoption of e-Government and the Enhancement of Democracy
Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate if, and in that case, how and what the e‐government field can learn from user participation concepts and theories in general information systems (IS) research. It aims to contribute with further understanding of the importance of citizen participation and involvement within the e‐government research body of knowledge and when developing public e‐services in practice. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis in the paper is made from a comparative, qualitative case study of two e‐government projects. Three analysis themes are induced from the literature review; practice of participation, incentives for participation, and organization of participation. These themes are guiding the comparative analysis of our data with a concurrent openness to interpretations from the field. Findings – The main results in this paper are that the e‐government field can get inspiration and learn from methods and approaches in traditional IS projects concerning user participation, but in e‐government, methods are also needed to handle the challenges that arise when designing public e‐services for large, heterogeneous user groups. Citizen engagement cannot be seen as a separate challenge in e‐government, but rather as an integrated part of the process of organizing, managing, and performing e‐government projects. Analysis themes of participation generated from literature; practice, incentives and organization can be used in order to highlight, analyze, and discuss main issues regarding the challenges of citizen participation within e‐government. This is an important implication based on this paper that contributes both to theory on and practice of e‐government. Practical implications – Lessons to learn from this paper concern that many e‐government projects have a public e‐service as one outcome and an internal e‐administration system as another outcome. A dominating internal, agency perspective in such projects might imply that citizens as the user group of the e‐service are only seen as passive receivers of the outcome – not as active participants in the development. By applying the analysis themes, proposed in this paper, citizens as active participants can be thoroughly discussed when initiating (or evaluating) an e‐government project. Originality/value – The paper addresses challenges regarding citizen participation in e‐government development projects. User participation is well researched within the IS discipline, but the e‐government setting implies new challenges that are not explored enough.
Transforming Government People Process and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2010
Keywords: Communication technologies; Information systems; Citizen participation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.