Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Hilton, G. Harris, M. Rice, Ruth Houghton, Angela Eke (2008)
An Indepth Actuarial Assessment for Wife Assault Recidivism: The Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal GuideLaw and Human Behavior, 32
(1999)
Spousal Assault Risk
Bradley Johnson (2000)
Assessing the risk for violence.New directions for mental health services, 86
S. Walklate, Gabe Mythen (2011)
Beyond risk theory: Experiential knowledge and ‘knowing otherwise’Criminology & Criminal Justice, 11
T. Taillieu, D. Brownridge (2010)
Violence against pregnant women: Prevalence, patterns, risk factors, theories, and directions for future researchAggression and Violent Behavior, 15
(2017)
Domestic abuse.Nursing management, 24 2
J. Jasinski (2004)
Pregnancy and Domestic ViolenceTrauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5
(2014)
Violence and women: Factsheet No 239
P. Kropp (2004)
Some Questions Regarding Spousal Assault Risk AssessmentViolence Against Women, 10
S. Holm (1979)
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test ProcedureScandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6
R. Hare (2011)
Hare Psychopathy Checklist
(2009)
DASH: Domestic Abuse, Stalking and Harassment and Honour Based Violence Risk Identification and Assessment and Management Model, DASH Risk Checklist
Henian Chen, P. Cohen, Sophie Chen (2010)
How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological StudiesCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 39
(2006)
Homicide prevention: Findings from the Multi-agency Domestic Violence Homicide Review
K. Williams, Amy Houghton (2004)
Assessing the Risk of Domestic Violence Reoffending: A Validation StudyLaw and Human Behavior, 28
D. Heckert, E. Gondolf (2004)
Battered Women’s Perceptions of Risk Versus Risk Factors and Instruments in Predicting Repeat ReassaultJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 19
A. Weisz, R. Tolman, D. Saunders (2000)
Assessing the Risk of Severe Domestic ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 15
(2011)
Crime in England and Wales 2010/11: findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime. Home Office: London
(2011)
Homicides, firearm offences and Intimate violence
S. Olejnik, Jianmin Li, Suchada Supattathum, C. Huberty (1997)
Multiple Testing and Statistical Power With Modified Bonferroni ProceduresJournal of Educational Statistics, 22
C. Webster, K. Douglas, D. Eaves, S. Hart (1997)
Assessing risk of violence to others.
C. Hoyle (2008)
Will she be safe? A critical analysis of risk assessment in domestic violence casesChildren and Youth Services Review, 30
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15
N. Hilton, G. Harris, M. Rice, Carol Lang, Catherine Cormier, Kathryn Lines (2004)
A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment.Psychological assessment, 16 3
Jennifer Storey, A. Gibas, K. Reeves, S. Hart (2011)
Evaluation of a Violence Risk (Threat) Assessment Training Program for Police and Other Criminal Justice ProfessionalsCriminal Justice and Behavior, 38
D. Canter (2008)
Criminal Psychology: Topics in Applied Psychology
J. Mcfarlane, B. Parker, K. Soeken, L. Bullock (1993)
Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal careInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 40
Jacquelyn Campbell (1995)
Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers.
J. Roehl (2000)
Intimate Partner Violence: The Current Use of Risk Assessments in Sentencing OffendersJustice System Journal, 21
J. Mcfarlane, B. Parker, K. Soeken, L. Bullock (1992)
Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. Severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care.JAMA, 267
(2015)
DASH (2009), Frequently asked questions
K. Chan (2012)
Predicting the Risk of Intimate Partner Violence: The Chinese Risk Assessment Tool for VictimsJournal of Family Violence, 27
(2015)
Experimental statistics 2: Domestic abuse offences recorded by the police, April to September 2015
S. Stith, Douglas Smith, Carrie Penn, D. Ward, Dari Tritt (2004)
Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10
F. Coleman (1997)
Stalking Behavior and the Cycle of Domestic ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 12
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore risk factors contained in the existing UK domestic abuse (DA) risk assessment tool: domestic abuse, stalking and harassment and honour-based violence (DASH) for individual predictive validity of DA recidivism using data from Devon and Cornwall Constabulary.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 1,441 DA perpetrators were monitored over a 12-month period, and 270 (18.7 per cent) went on to commit a further DA offence. The individual risk factors which were associated and predictive of increased risk of recidivism were identified.FindingsOnly four of the individual risk factors were significantly associated with an increased risk of DA recidivism: “criminal history”, “problems with alcohol”, “separation” and “frightened”. Therefore, 21 of the risk factor items analysed could not discriminate between non-recidivist and recidivist perpetrators. Only two risk factors were able to significantly predict the recidivist group when compared to the non-recidivist group. These were identified as “criminal history” and “separated”. Of those who did commit a further DA offence in the following 12 months, 133 were violent and 137 were non-violent. The risk factors associated with these types of recidivism are identified.Practical implicationsThe implications for UK police practice and the DASH risk assessment tool are discussed. By identifying key individual factors that can prioritise those individuals likely to recidivate and the severity of that recidivism, this could assist police decision making regarding the response and further prevention of DA incidents. The validation of association between individual factors and DA recidivism should improve the accuracy of risk levels.Originality/valueThis is the first large-scale validation of the individual risk factors contained within the UK’s DA risk assessment tool. It should be noted that the validity of the DASH tool itself was not examined within the current study.
Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 9, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.