Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evolving landscape of scholarly journals in open access environment

Evolving landscape of scholarly journals in open access environment Open access journals (OAJs) offer immediate, free and unrestricted online access to the scholarly literature. The purpose of this study is to trace the status and characteristics of OAJs published across the globe. Various trends that have evolved in OAJ market have been studied.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on data collected from one of the largest OA journal directory – Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The data were downloaded on 02 January 2018 and details of OAJs added to DOAJ till 31 December 2018 were harvested, codified and further analyzed in SPSS software. A Microsoft-Excel template application – MAKESENS – developed by Finnish Meteorological Institute (Finland) in 2002, was explored to perform Mann–Kendall Test and Sen’s Slope Estimates.FindingsA less score of OAJs offer access to their archival content. An increasing trend is witnessed in the OAJ publishing with Elsevier, Sciendo and BioMed Central (BMC) as the top publishers. Majority of publishers are from high-income zone countries, followed by upper-middle and lower-middle zone countries. Majority of OA publishers are from the UK, Indonesia and Brazil. A lesser score of journals offer article processing charges and/or author submission charges. Majority of OAJs from high- and lower-middle-income zone countries levy submission/processing charge to authors compared to OA journals from upper-middle- and lower-income zone countries (p < 0.01). OJS stays a prioritized platform for hosting OA journal content. Portico and CLOCKSS/LOCKSS are mostly used for long-term preservation purposes. Majority of OAJs from high-income zone countries participate in digital arching initiatives compared to ones from other income zones. Majority of the journals adopt a peer review (double-blind peer review, blind peer review, peer review and open peer review) process for validation of their scholarly content. The time lag between submission and publication ranges from one to 53 weeks, with majority of OAJs having a time lag of 11-20 weeks. Creative Commons Licenses are mainly adopted by OAJs.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study is based on the data offered by DOAJ, any gaps in the DOAJ data will also get reflected in the study. Further, there might be other OAJs also that have yet to show compliance with DOAJ standards and get indexed with it.Originality/valueThe study tries to showcase the current status and characteristics of OAJs. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication" Emerald Publishing

Evolving landscape of scholarly journals in open access environment

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/evolving-landscape-of-scholarly-journals-in-open-access-environment-5lX00lvrJL
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2514-9342
DOI
10.1108/gkmc-10-2018-0085
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Open access journals (OAJs) offer immediate, free and unrestricted online access to the scholarly literature. The purpose of this study is to trace the status and characteristics of OAJs published across the globe. Various trends that have evolved in OAJ market have been studied.Design/methodology/approachThe study is based on data collected from one of the largest OA journal directory – Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). The data were downloaded on 02 January 2018 and details of OAJs added to DOAJ till 31 December 2018 were harvested, codified and further analyzed in SPSS software. A Microsoft-Excel template application – MAKESENS – developed by Finnish Meteorological Institute (Finland) in 2002, was explored to perform Mann–Kendall Test and Sen’s Slope Estimates.FindingsA less score of OAJs offer access to their archival content. An increasing trend is witnessed in the OAJ publishing with Elsevier, Sciendo and BioMed Central (BMC) as the top publishers. Majority of publishers are from high-income zone countries, followed by upper-middle and lower-middle zone countries. Majority of OA publishers are from the UK, Indonesia and Brazil. A lesser score of journals offer article processing charges and/or author submission charges. Majority of OAJs from high- and lower-middle-income zone countries levy submission/processing charge to authors compared to OA journals from upper-middle- and lower-income zone countries (p < 0.01). OJS stays a prioritized platform for hosting OA journal content. Portico and CLOCKSS/LOCKSS are mostly used for long-term preservation purposes. Majority of OAJs from high-income zone countries participate in digital arching initiatives compared to ones from other income zones. Majority of the journals adopt a peer review (double-blind peer review, blind peer review, peer review and open peer review) process for validation of their scholarly content. The time lag between submission and publication ranges from one to 53 weeks, with majority of OAJs having a time lag of 11-20 weeks. Creative Commons Licenses are mainly adopted by OAJs.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study is based on the data offered by DOAJ, any gaps in the DOAJ data will also get reflected in the study. Further, there might be other OAJs also that have yet to show compliance with DOAJ standards and get indexed with it.Originality/valueThe study tries to showcase the current status and characteristics of OAJs.

Journal

"Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication" – Emerald Publishing

Published: Sep 10, 2019

Keywords: Open access; Open access journals; Scholarly communication; Open access journals-growth and development; Directory of open access journals; DOAJ

References

  • Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals: does it make a difference?
    Björk, B.C.; Catani, P.
  • The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals
    Bjork, B.; Solomon, D.
  • Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009
    Björk, B.-C.; Welling, P.; Laakso, M.; Majlender, P.; Hedlund, T.; Guonason, G.
  • About Budapest open access initiative
  • Mega-journals and peer review: can quality and standards survive?
    Buriak, J.M.
  • PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing
    Butler, D.
  • The status of open access library and information science journals in SSCI
    Chen, M.; Du, Y.
  • Open access
    Cirasella, J.
  • Open access scientific publishing and the developing world
    Contreras, J.L.
  • Brazilian open access initiatives: Key strategies and actions
    Costa, S.M.S.; Leite, F.C.L.
  • Anatomy of open access mathematics journals
    Das, P.K.
  • Bulk publishing keeps PLoS afloat
    Davis, P.
  • A survey of scholarly journals using open journal systems
    Edgar, B.D.; Willinsky, J.
  • Features of top-rated gold open access journals: an analysis of the scopus database
    Ennas, G.; Di Guardo, M.C.
  • Status and quality of open access journals in Scopus
    Erfanmanesh, M.
  • Open access publishing and scholarly communications in non-scientific disciplines
    Eve, M.P.
  • The diamond model of open access publishing: unions and the publishing world need to take non-commercial, non-profit open access serious
    Fuchs, C.; Sandoval, M.
  • Current status of open access journals published in D8 countries and registered in the directory of open access journals (pre-2000 to 2014)
    Ghane, M.R.; Niazmand, M.R.
  • Open access journals: a global perspective
    Gul, S.; Wani, Z.A.; Majeed, I.
  • The self-archiving initiative
    Harnad, S.
  • The ‘platinum route’ to open access: a case study of E-JASL: the electronic journal of academic and special librarianship
    Haschak, P.G.
  • Open access to scholarly full-text documents
    Jacso, P.
  • Scientific potential of European fully open access journals
    Jokić, M.; Mervar, A.; Mateljan, S.
  • Free journals grow amid ongoing debate
    Kaiser, J.
  • Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure
    Laakso, M.; Björk, B.C.
  • The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009
    Laakso, M.; Welling, P.; Bukvova, H.; Nyman, L.; Björk, B.C.
  • Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: a comparative analysis
    Liu, W.; Li, Y.
  • Indian contribution to open access literature: a case study of DOAJ and OpenDOAR
    Loan, F.; Shah, J.
  • An overview of open access in the fields of business and management
    Lyons, C.; Booth, H.A.
  • Open access journals and the ISI citation database: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: Thomson scientific whitepaper
    McVeigh, M.E.
  • Evidence of open access of scientific publications in Google scholar: a large-scale analysis
    Martín-Martín, A.; Costas, R.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Delgado López-Cózar, E.
  • Open science in Indonesia
    Matthias, L.
  • Open access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access
    Miguel, S.; Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z.; De Moya-Anegõn, F.
  • Open access journals in SAARC countries with special reference to DOAJ: a study
    Mondal, D.
  • Open access article processing charges: DOAJ survey may 2014
    Morrison, H.; Salhab, J.; Calvé-Genest, A.; Horava, T.
  • What is the future of scholarly journals in an open access environment?
    O’Donnell, M.P.
  • Open access publishing, academic research and scholarly communication
    Osborne, R.
  • Global scenario of open access publishing: a decadal analysis of directory of open access journals (DOAJ) 2003-2012
    Pandita, R.; Ramesha, B.
  • Making open access work
    Pinfield, S.
  • Open access journals in communication studies: indexing in five commercial databases
    Poulin, S.; Tomaszewski, R.
  • Open access journals in library and information science: a study
    Pujar, S.M.
  • Public research funding systems in Central and Eastern Europe: between excellence and relevance: introduction to special section
    Radosevic, S.; Lepori, B.
  • Open-access journals: bane or boon?
    Rohrer, J.E.
  • Open access journals in library and information science: the story so far
    Rufai, R.; Gul, S.; Shah, T.A.
  • Archiving in the networked world: open access journals
    Seadle, M.
  • Philosophy of escapism in the open access world: studying author pay model
    Shah, T.A.; Gul, S.
  • Types of open access publishers in Scopus: publications
    Solomon, D.
  • A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals
    Solomon, D.J.; Laakso, M.; Björk, B.
  • The world’s approach toward publishing in Springer and Elsevier’s APC-Funded open access journals
    Sotudeh, H.; Ghasempour, Z.
  • The citation performance of open access journals: a disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models
    Sotudeh, H.; Horri, A.
  • Open access
  • Distributed digital preservation: preserving open journal systems content in the PKP PN
    Sprout, B.; Jordan, M.
  • Monitoring the transition to open
    Tickell, A.; Pinfield, S.
  • Open access infrastructure in Greece: current status, challenges and perspectives
    Togia, A.; Koseoglou, E.; Zapounidou, S.; Tsigilis, N.
  • Observed changes in precipitation in China-Pakistan economic corridor during 1980-2016
    Ullah, S.; You, Q.; Ullah, W.; Ali, A.
  • Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level
    Van Leeuwen, T.N.; Tatum, C.; Wouters, P.F.
  • The true cost of science publishing
    Van Noorden, R.
  • Visualizing open access
    Vierkant, P.
  • The state and evolution of gold open access: a country and discipline level analysis
    Wang, X.; Cui, Y.; Xu, S.; Hu, Z.
  • Best practices in licensing and attribution: what you need to know
    Williams, L.