Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Crop insurance and preharvest pricing strategies were analyzed for all years and years following a normal crop year scenarios for the 1986 through 2001 period in three Indiana counties. Crop insurance products and early spring preharvest marketing generally had positive returns for producers. A large number of strategies provided higher mean revenues, higher 5 per cent valuesatrisk, and higher certainty equivalents than the benchmark strategy. Although preharvest marketing strategies had the highest certainty equivalents in both scenarios, net farm revenues were lower and crop insurance combined with preharvest pricing were common among topranked strategies following normal crop years.
Agricultural Finance Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 5, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.