Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Chunghun Ha, Hyesung Seok, Changsoo Ok (2018)
Evaluation of forecasting methods in aggregate production planning: A Cumulative Absolute Forecast Error (CAFE)Comput. Ind. Eng., 118
K. Al‐Harbi (2001)
Application of the AHP in project managementInternational Journal of Project Management, 19
Bing Xu, J. Ouenniche (2012)
Performance evaluation of competing forecasting models: A multidimensional framework based on MCDAExpert Syst. Appl., 39
Maud Broeke, Shari Baets, A. Vereecke, Philippe Baecke, K. Vanderheyden (2019)
Judgmental forecast adjustments over different time horizonsOmega
N. Cheikhrouhou, F. Marmier, Omar Ayadi, Philippe Wieser (2011)
A collaborative demand forecasting process with event-based fuzzy judgementsComput. Ind. Eng., 61
P. Franses (2011)
Averaging Model Forecasts and Expert Forecasts: Why Does It Work?Interfaces, 41
European Journal of Operational Research, 48
R. Fildes, P. Goodwin, Michael Lawrence, Konstantinos Nikolopoulos (2009)
Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: an empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planningInternational Journal of Forecasting, 25
F. Petropoulos, N. Kourentzes, K. Nikolopoulos, Enno Siemsen (2018)
Judgmental selection of forecasting modelsJournal of Operations Management, 60
R. Fildes, Yingqi Wei, Suzilah Ismail (2011)
Evaluating the forecasting performance of econometric models of air passenger traffic flows using multiple error measuresInternational Journal of Forecasting, 27
Weiwei Han, Xun Wang, F. Petropoulos, J. Wang (2019)
Brain imaging and forecasting: Insights from judgmental model selectionOmega
A. Davydenko, R. Fildes (2016)
10.13140/RG.2.1.4539.5281Business Forecasting: Practical Problems and Solutions
Hossein Hassani, E. Silva, Rangan Gupta, Mawuli Segnon (2015)
Forecasting the price of goldApplied Economics, 47
SangHeon Han (2016)
How can we handle too many criteria/alternatives? : A study on AHP structural design, 60
J. Trapero, N. Kourentzes, R. Fildes (2012)
Impact of Information Exchange on Supplier Forecasting PerformanceOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 40
F. Marmier, N. Cheikhrouhou (2010)
Structuring and integrating human knowledge in demand forecasting: a judgemental adjustment approachProduction Planning & Control, 21
M. Velasquez, Patrick Hester (2013)
An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods
James Taylor, P. McSharry (2007)
Short-Term Load Forecasting Methods: An Evaluation Based on European DataIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 22
Nijat Mehdiyev, D. Enke, Peter Fettke, P. Loos (2016)
Evaluating Forecasting Methods by Considering Different Accuracy MeasuresProcedia Computer Science, 95
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identificationIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19
Meysam Arvan, B. Fahimnia, Mohsen Reisi, Enno Siemsen (2019)
Integrating human judgement into quantitative forecasting methods: A reviewOmega
P. Franses, Rianne Legerstee (2009)
Do experts' adjustments on model-based SKU-level forecasts improve forecast quality?Journal of Forecasting, 29
Operations Research, 30
(2016)
Forecast Error Measures: Critical Review and Practical Recommendations. In Business Forecasting: Practical Problems and Solutions
L. Ren, Yong Glasure (2009)
Applicability of the Revised Mean Absolute Percentage Errors (MAPE) Approach to Some Popular Normal and Non-normal Independent Time SeriesInternational Advances in Economic Research, 15
J. Alvarado-Valencia, Lope Barrero, Dilek Önkal, Jack Dennerlein (2017)
Expertise, credibility of system forecasts and integration methods in judgmental demand forecastingInternational Journal of Forecasting, 33
Rob Hyndman, A. Koehler (2006)
Another look at measures of forecast accuracyInternational Journal of Forecasting, 22
C. Oh, B. Morzuch (2005)
Evaluating Time-Series Models to Forecast the Demand for Tourism in SingaporeJournal of Travel Research, 43
T. Saaty (1996)
Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity
Li Tao, Yan Chen, Xiaodong Liu, Xin Wang (2012)
An integrated multiple criteria decision making model applying axiomatic fuzzy set theoryApplied Mathematical Modelling, 36
T. Saaty (1990)
How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy ProcessInterfaces, 24
J. Armstrong (2001)
Evaluating Forecasting Methods
A. Davydenko, R. Fildes (2013)
Measuring forecasting accuracy : the case of judgmental adjustments to SKU-level demand forecastsInternational Journal of Forecasting, 29
Selin Kara, N. Cheikhrouhou (2014)
A multi criteria group decision making approach for collaborative software selection problemJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 26
M. Villegas, D. Pedregal, J. Trapero (2018)
A support vector machine for model selection in demand forecasting applicationsComput. Ind. Eng., 121
A. Ghobbar, C. Friend (2003)
Evaluation of forecasting methods for intermittent parts demand in the field of aviation: a predictive modelComput. Oper. Res., 30
R. Webby, M. O'Connor (1996)
Judgemental and statistical time series forecasting: a review of the literatureInternational Journal of Forecasting, 12
Daji Ergu, Gang Kou, Yi Peng, Yong Shi (2011)
A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pair-wise comparison matrix in ANPEur. J. Oper. Res., 213
S. Sipahi, Mehpare Timor (2010)
The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applicationsManagement Decision, 48
Hossein Hassani, E. Silva (2015)
A Kolmogorov-Smirnov Based Test for Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Two Sets of ForecastsEconometrics, 3
Demand forecasting models in companies are often a mix of quantitative models and qualitative methods. As there are so many existing forecasting approaches, many forecasters have difficulty in deciding on which model to select as they may perform “best” in a specific error measure, and not in another. Currently, there is no approach that evaluates different model classes and several interdependent error measures simultaneously, making forecasting model selection particularly difficult when error measures yield conflicting results.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes a novel procedure of multi-criteria evaluation of demand forecasting models, simultaneously considering several error measures and their interdependencies based on a two-stage multi-criteria decision-making approach. Analytical Network Process combined with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (ANP-TOPSIS) is developed, evaluated and validated through an implementation case of a plastic bag manufacturer.FindingsThe results show that the approach identifies the best forecasting model when considering many error measures, even in the presence of conflicting error measures. Furthermore, considering the interdependence between error measures is essential to determine their relative importance for the final ranking calculation.Originality/valueThe paper's contribution is a novel multi-criteria approach to evaluate multiclass demand forecasting models and select the best model, considering several interdependent error measures simultaneously, which is lacking in the literature. The work helps structuring decision making in forecasting and avoiding the selection of inappropriate or “worse” forecasting model.
Journal of Advances in Management Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 19, 2021
Keywords: Decision making; Forecasting; Multicriteria; ANP
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.