Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ethics’ power dynamics in higher education’s self-ethnographic research

Ethics’ power dynamics in higher education’s self-ethnographic research PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight levels of power in research ethics that are insufficiently addressed in self-ethnographic research literature.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reflexively draws from a qualitative research that was conducted in a higher education institution (HEI) in South Africa. The reflection is substantiated with literature on various aspects of the reflection. The research design was self-ethnography, conducted within a postmodernist paradigm.FindingsThe reflection exposes the hidden levels of power in the process of ethical clearance and gatekeeping of access to participants. It also suggests that different theoretical perspectives about ethics work together throughout the self-ethnographic research process.Research limitations/implicationsThe research on which the paper is based was conducted in only one college of one HEI. Therefore its findings may only be contextual.Practical implicationsThe exposure of the levels of power contributes to the discourses of research ethics and may caution self-ethnographic researchers about the complexities of research ethics involved in this research design.Originality/valueAlthough there is plethora of literature about ethics and insider research, little has been done to bring to light the various levels of power that this paper highlights. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

Ethics’ power dynamics in higher education’s self-ethnographic research

Madikizela-Madiya, Nomanesi
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 17 (1): 11 – Feb 6, 2017
Download PDF
11 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/ethics-power-dynamics-in-higher-education-s-self-ethnographic-research-bf8CLm6Q7i
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/QRJ-06-2016-0038
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to highlight levels of power in research ethics that are insufficiently addressed in self-ethnographic research literature.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reflexively draws from a qualitative research that was conducted in a higher education institution (HEI) in South Africa. The reflection is substantiated with literature on various aspects of the reflection. The research design was self-ethnography, conducted within a postmodernist paradigm.FindingsThe reflection exposes the hidden levels of power in the process of ethical clearance and gatekeeping of access to participants. It also suggests that different theoretical perspectives about ethics work together throughout the self-ethnographic research process.Research limitations/implicationsThe research on which the paper is based was conducted in only one college of one HEI. Therefore its findings may only be contextual.Practical implicationsThe exposure of the levels of power contributes to the discourses of research ethics and may caution self-ethnographic researchers about the complexities of research ethics involved in this research design.Originality/valueAlthough there is plethora of literature about ethics and insider research, little has been done to bring to light the various levels of power that this paper highlights.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 6, 2017

There are no references for this article.