Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Popkewitz (1999)
Reviewing Reviews: RER, Research, and the Politics of Educational Knowledge, 69
Donald Atkinson, M. Furlong, B. Wampold (1982)
Statistical significance, reviewer evaluations, and the scientific process: Is there a (statistically) significant relationship?Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29
W. Harlen, R. Crick (2004)
Opportunities and Challenges of Using Systematic Reviews of Research for Evidence-based Policy in EducationEvaluation & Research in Education, 18
C. Estabrooks, P. Field, J. Morse (1994)
Aggregating Qualitative Findings: An Approach to Theory DevelopmentQualitative Health Research, 4
R. Elmore (1991)
Comment on “Towards Rigor in Reviews of Multivocal Literatures: Applying the Exploratory Case Study Method”Review of Educational Research, 61
K. Dickersin, Y. Min, C. Meinert (1992)
Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards.JAMA, 267 3
M. Dixon-Woods, Shona Agarwal, B. Young, David Jones, A. Sutton (2004)
Integrative approaches to qualitative and quantitative evidence
M. Petticrew, H. Roberts (2005)
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
P. Moss (2005)
UNDERSTANDING THE OTHER/UNDERSTANDING OURSELVES: TOWARD A CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOGUE ABOUT “PRINCIPLES’ IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHEducational Theory, 55
S. Meacham (1998)
Threads of a New Language: A Response to Eisenhart’s ‘On the Subject of Interpretive Review’Review of Educational Research, 68
D. Clandinin, F. Connelly (1996)
Teachers' Professional Knowledge Landscapes: Teacher Stories––Stories of Teachers––School Stories––Stories of Schools1Educational Researcher, 25
Y. Lincoln, Gaile Cannella (2004)
Dangerous Discourses: Methodological Conservatism and Governmental Regimes of TruthQualitative Inquiry, 10
J. Maxwell (2004)
Reemergent Scientism, Postmodernism, and Dialogue Across DifferencesQualitative Inquiry, 10
A. Coursol, E. Wagner (1986)
Effect of positive findings on submission and acceptance rates: A note on meta-analysis bias.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17
C. Canam, S. Thorne (2001)
Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis
M. Apple (1999)
What Counts as Legitimate Knowledge? The Social Production and Use of Reviews, 69
G. Matt, T. Cook (1994)
Threats to the validity of research syntheses
N. Miller, V. Pollock (1994)
Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development.
M. Wideen, Jolie Mayer-Smith, Barbara Moon (1998)
A Critical Analysis of the Research on Learning to Teach: Making the Case for an Ecological Perspective on InquiryReview of Educational Research, 68
K. Howe (2005)
THE QUESTION OF EDUCATION SCIENCE: EXPERIMENTISM VERSUS EXPERIMENTALISMEducational Theory, 55
A. Petrosino, R. Boruch, C. Rounding, Steve McDonald, I. Chalmers (2000)
The Campbell Collaboration Social, Psychological, Educational and Criminological Trials Register (C2-SPECTR) to Facilitate the Preparation and Maintenance of Systematic Reviews of Social and Educational InterventionsEvaluation & Research in Education, 14
B. Baker (1999)
What is Voice? Issues of Identity and Representation in the Framing of Reviews, 69
A. Schoenfeld (2006)
What Doesn’t Work: The Challenge and Failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to Conduct Meaningful Reviews of Studies of Mathematics CurriculaEducational Researcher, 35
P. Easterbrook, R. Gopalan, J. Berlin, D. Matthews (1991)
Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 337
M. Fine (1994)
Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research.
A. Greenwald (1975)
Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null HypothesisPsychological Bulletin, 82
B. Paterson, S. Thorne, C. Canam, C. Jillings (2001)
Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research
J. Willinsky (2005)
Scientific Research in a Democratic Culture: Or What's a Social Science For?.Teachers College Record, 107
M. Patton (1991)
Towards Utility in Reviews of Multivocal LiteraturesReview of Educational Research, 61
A. Segall (2001)
Critical ethnography and the invocation of voice: From the field/in the field - single exposure, double standard?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14
B. Franklin (1999)
Discourse, Rationality, and Educational Research: A Historical Perspective of RER 1, 69
B. Gordon (1999)
Who Do You Believe—Me or Your Eyes? Perceptions and Issues in Educational Research: Reviews and the Journals That Validate Them, 69
N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (1994)
Handbook of Qualitative ResearchBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 42
H. Cooper, L. Hedges (1995)
The Handbook of Research SynthesisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 37
G. Glass (1976)
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1Educational Researcher, 5
Research syntheses play a powerful role in shaping further research, practice, policy and public perceptions. Accordingly, the ethical issues associated with how perspectives of different groups are included or censored in a research synthesis report must be paid adequate attention. Any research synthesis is inherently influenced by subjectivities associated with multiple layers of interpretation, selection and representation. In framing a research synthesis, it is vital that synthesists take into account multiple interests and influences of different stakeholders potential impact of the synthesis on different stakeholders synthesists own multiple and shifting identities within the synthesis synthesists methodological positioning within the synthesis status accorded to authors and participants of the primary research studies included in the synthesis influences of funding agencies politics of whowhat gets published and biases introduced through common strategies for retrieving primary research studies. I have raised strategic questions and issues to structure and inform critical decisionmaking throughout a synthesis process. I hope this article will stimulate debate and discussion on various ethical considerations associated with the process of synthesising research.
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 6, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.