Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects Findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK

Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects Findings from a survey conducted... Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the measures that enhance value for money (VFM) in public private partnership (PPP) projects from the findings achieved in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong (also known as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) and Australia, and is compared to the results conducted by other researchers in the UK. Design/methodology/approach – Respondents to the questionnaire were asked to rate 18 VFM measures in PPP projects. Findings – The results found that the top five VFM measures ranked by the respondents from Hong Kong included: efficient risk allocation (allocating the risk to the party best able to manage it); output‐based specification; competitive tender; private management skill; and private sector technical innovation. The first and second of these VFM measures were also found to be ranked high by the respondents from Australia and the UK, indicating that these were true for these jurisdictions. Practical implications – When the risks are handled well, less pitfalls are experienced and as a result VFM is more achievable. Hence, an efficient risk allocation is vital in determining whether VFM can be achieved in PPP projects. A clear output‐based specification can enable a more obvious project design and concept hence minimizing the possibility of delivering the wrong product for the user. Therefore, this measure is also important in determining whether VFM has been achieved for a PPP venture. Despite the interest in PPP, there is need for more systematic and in‐depth research to examine the measures that enhance VFM in PPP projects in Hong Kong. Originality/value – In addition, this project also forms a comparative study for the use of PPP in Hong Kong, Australia and the UK. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction Emerald Publishing

Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects Findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/enhancing-value-for-money-in-public-private-partnership-projects-skMD21guuu

References (34)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1366-4387
DOI
10.1108/13664380910942617
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the measures that enhance value for money (VFM) in public private partnership (PPP) projects from the findings achieved in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong (also known as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) and Australia, and is compared to the results conducted by other researchers in the UK. Design/methodology/approach – Respondents to the questionnaire were asked to rate 18 VFM measures in PPP projects. Findings – The results found that the top five VFM measures ranked by the respondents from Hong Kong included: efficient risk allocation (allocating the risk to the party best able to manage it); output‐based specification; competitive tender; private management skill; and private sector technical innovation. The first and second of these VFM measures were also found to be ranked high by the respondents from Australia and the UK, indicating that these were true for these jurisdictions. Practical implications – When the risks are handled well, less pitfalls are experienced and as a result VFM is more achievable. Hence, an efficient risk allocation is vital in determining whether VFM can be achieved in PPP projects. A clear output‐based specification can enable a more obvious project design and concept hence minimizing the possibility of delivering the wrong product for the user. Therefore, this measure is also important in determining whether VFM has been achieved for a PPP venture. Despite the interest in PPP, there is need for more systematic and in‐depth research to examine the measures that enhance VFM in PPP projects in Hong Kong. Originality/value – In addition, this project also forms a comparative study for the use of PPP in Hong Kong, Australia and the UK.

Journal

Journal of Financial Management of Property and ConstructionEmerald Publishing

Published: Apr 17, 2009

Keywords: Hong Kong; Australia; United Kingdom; Partnership; Public sector organizations; Private sector organizations

There are no references for this article.