Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Seok Kim, Jung Lee (2007)
Is Mission Attachment an Effective Management Tool for Employee Retention? An Empirical Analysis of a Nonprofit Human Services AgencyReview of Public Personnel Administration, 27
(2009)
Mission statements – a study of intent and influence
D. Hambrick, J. Fredrickson (2001)
Are you sure you have a strategyAcademy of Management Executive, 19
Martha Lagace (2008)
The Execution Premium : Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage
J. Barney, Teppo Felin (2013)
What Are Microfoundations?ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes (Topic)
Sebastian Desmidt (2016)
The Relevance of Mission Statements: Analysing the antecedents of perceived message quality and its relationship to employee mission engagementPublic Management Review, 18
M. Degroote (2001)
A model of the impact of mission statements on firm performance
S. Winter (2013)
Habit, Deliberation, and Action: Strengthening the Microfoundations of Routines and CapabilitiesAcademy of Management Perspectives, 27
S. Kerr (1975)
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 18 4
Triple bottom line (TBL) accounting expands the traditional reporting framework to take into account social and environmental performance in addition to financial performance
R. Chun, G. Davies (2001)
E-reputation: The role of mission and vision statements in positioning strategyJournal of Brand Management, 8
D. Sull (2007)
Closing the Gap Between Strategy and ExecutionMIT Sloan Management Review, 48
T. Devinney, G. Dowling (2020)
The Strategies of Australia’s Universities: Revise & ResubmitThe Strategies of Australia’s Universities
M. Klemm, S. Sanderson, G. Luffman (1991)
Mission statements: selling corporate values to employees.Long range planning, 24 3
The concept of TBL demands that a company’s responsibility lies with stakeholders rather than shareholders. In this
B. Djulbegovic, M. Lacevic, A. Cantor, K. Fields, Charles Bennett, Jared Adams, N. Kuderer, G. Lyman (2000)
The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored researchThe Lancet, 356
T. Devinney (2013)
Is Microfoundational Thinking Critical to Management Thought and PracticeAcademy of Management Perspectives, 27
(2017)
Good Strategy / Bad Strategy
I. Macedo, J. Pinho, A. Silva (2016)
Revisiting the link between mission statements and organizational performance in the non-profit sector: The mediating effect of organizational commitmentEuropean Management Journal, 34
R. Simons (1991)
Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systemsStrategic Management Journal , 12(1)
Mark Dailey (2021)
A Leader's Guide to Storytelling
C. Bart, N. Bontis, S. Taggar (2001)
A MODEL OF THE IMPACT OF MISSION STATEMENTS ON FIRM PERFORMANCEManagement Decision, 39
Academy of Management Journal, 18
N. Foss, S. Lindenberg (2013)
Microfoundations for Strategy: A Goal-Framing Perspective on the Drivers of Value CreationAcademy of Management Perspectives, 27
(2016)
Winning the Reputation Game
Gamze Orhan, Dilek Erdoğan, V. Durmaz (2014)
Adopting Mission and Vision Statements by Employees: The Case of TAV Airports☆Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150
D. Whetten (2006)
Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the Concept of Organizational IdentityJournal of Management Inquiry, 15
T. Erickson, L. Gratton (2007)
What it means to work here.Harvard business review, 85 3
One of the hallmarks of strategizing is having a clearly articulated vision and mission for the organization. It has been suggested that this provides a compass bearing for the organization's strategy, helps in motivation, commitment and retention of employees, serves as a guide to internal sensemaking and decision-making, has a potential performance effect, helps establish the identity of the organization and positions its desired reputation. The compass bearing role is important because it guides the selection of the goals and strategic orientation of the organization which in turn shapes its overall strategy and much of its internal decision making. The inspirational role is important because it helps to motivate and engage employees and other stakeholders.Design/methodology/approachThis study provides a more rigorous indication as to whether employees can, in the first instance, recognize and distinguish their corporate and environmental strategy from that of their competitors within their own industry and random other companies from other industries. This first issue addresses, to a degree, if and why, such strategic communiqués are effective inside a range of different organizations. Secondly, the authors examine whether there are any specific individual level effects that could explain variations in these responses. Finally, the authors examine the extent to which the recognition rates the authors observe, relate to how employees are rewarded through appraisals, promotions and salary increases. This helps in the authors’ understanding of the role of hard incentives versus soft motivations. The authors’ approach to assessing employee knowledge of their organization's strategy is unique. Rather than survey employees about their knowledge, the authors use a matching study and a discrete choice measurement model to assess if they can recognize their organization's strategy from those of their competitors and some other randomly selected organizations. This approach allows us to mitigate social desirability and common method biases and directly estimate the underlying behavioral model being used to assess their organization's strategy.FindingsOverall, the authors found that few employees could correctly identify their corporate strategy statements. In the case of corporate strategy statements, the authors find that, on average, only 29 percent of employees could correctly match their company to its publicly espoused corporate strategy. When the authors look at the environmental sustainability strategy of the firm, this is worse overall, with individuals doing no better than random on average. When the authors look at company training and communication practices across the realm of different strategies, the authors see a number of factors leading to the general results. First, most of the authors’ respondents could not recall a significant effort being given to communication and training by their employer. Indeed, most communication/training is simply related to having documentation/brochures available. Second, respondents indicated that more effort is put into communicating corporate strategy to employees in a more systematic manner than communication about environmental/corporate social responsible (CSR) strategy. Third, the authors see that individuals are evaluated more on and give more weight to, evaluations relating to their ability to meet individual/group financial and market performance metrics (targets) and work as a team than their involvement in environmental and social responsibility programs. Finally, the employees studied seemed to be more confident in understanding the corporate strategy. When asked to put their corporate strategy into words – a task the authors asked respondents to do after the matching phase of the study – 40% of participants did so for the corporate strategy but only 14% did so for the environmental strategy and seven percent for the CSR strategy.Practical implicationsThe primary implication of the study is that the values-mission-strategy logic of strategic motivation seems to have limited validity and with respect to the view that employees are a vector of corporate strategy. It is hard to argue that employees can be a vector for something they cannot recall or even distinguish between.Originality/valueThe study is unique in terms of (1) asking the very simple question of whether employees internalize their company's strategies and (2) in the methodological approach to examine employee knowledge and informativeness.
Journal of Strategy and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2022
Keywords: Discrete choice analysis; Strategy; Mission; Employee knowledge
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.