Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Does sustainability reporting promote university ranking? Australian and New Zealand evidence

Does sustainability reporting promote university ranking? Australian and New Zealand evidence This study aims to investigate the relationship between university rankings and sustainability reporting among Australia and New Zealand universities. Even though sustainability reporting is an established area of investigation, prior research has paid inadequate attention to the nexus of university ranking and sustainability reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis study covers 46 Australian and New Zealand universities and uses a data set, which includes sustainability reports and disclosures from four reporting channels including university websites, and university archives, between 2005 and 2018. Ordinary least squares regression was used with Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlations to investigate the likelihood of multi-collinearity and the paper also calculated the variance inflation factor values. Finally, this study uses the generalized method of moments approach to test for endogeneity.FindingsThe findings suggest that sustainability reporting is significantly and positively associated with university ranking and confirm that the four reporting channels play a vital role when communicating with university stakeholders. Further, this paper documents that sustainability reporting through websites, in addition to the annual report and a separate environment report have a positive impact on the university ranking systems.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to extant knowledge on the link between university rankings and university sustainability reporting which is considered a vital communication vehicle to meet the expectation of the stakeholder in relevance with the university rankings. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Meditari Accountancy Research Emerald Publishing

Does sustainability reporting promote university ranking? Australian and New Zealand evidence

Download PDF
26 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/does-sustainability-reporting-promote-university-ranking-australian-uh0ywGHuNo
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2049-372X
eISSN
2049-372X
DOI
10.1108/medar-11-2020-1060
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between university rankings and sustainability reporting among Australia and New Zealand universities. Even though sustainability reporting is an established area of investigation, prior research has paid inadequate attention to the nexus of university ranking and sustainability reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis study covers 46 Australian and New Zealand universities and uses a data set, which includes sustainability reports and disclosures from four reporting channels including university websites, and university archives, between 2005 and 2018. Ordinary least squares regression was used with Pearson and Spearman’s rank correlations to investigate the likelihood of multi-collinearity and the paper also calculated the variance inflation factor values. Finally, this study uses the generalized method of moments approach to test for endogeneity.FindingsThe findings suggest that sustainability reporting is significantly and positively associated with university ranking and confirm that the four reporting channels play a vital role when communicating with university stakeholders. Further, this paper documents that sustainability reporting through websites, in addition to the annual report and a separate environment report have a positive impact on the university ranking systems.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to extant knowledge on the link between university rankings and university sustainability reporting which is considered a vital communication vehicle to meet the expectation of the stakeholder in relevance with the university rankings.

Journal

Meditari Accountancy Research – Emerald Publishing

Published: Nov 23, 2022

Keywords: University rankings; Sustainability reporting; Reporting channel; Australian and New Zealand higher education

References

  • Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: a literature review
    Ali, W.; Frynas, J.G.; Mahmood, Z.
  • Corporate reputation: anything but superficial – the deep but fragile nature of corporate reputation
    Alsop, R.J.
  • Global rankings are distorting universities' decisions, says ANU chief
    Baker, J.
  • Antecedents and consequences of university brand identification
    Balaji, M.S.; Roy, S.K.; Sadeque, S.
  • Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development
    Bansal, P.
  • Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management
    Bebbington, J.; Larrinaga, C.; Moneva, J.M.
  • The new English quality assurance regime
    Brown, R.
  • Is there an association between vice-chancellors’ compensation and external performance measures?
    Bugeja, M.; Govendir, B.; Matolcsy, Z.; Pazmandy, G.
  • Impression management in sustainability reports: an empirical investigation of the use of graphs
    Cho, C.H.; Michelon, G.; Patten, D.M.
  • Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting
    Cho, C.H.; Laine, M.; Roberts, R.W.; Rodrigue, M.
  • The stairway to the top: the remuneration of academic executives
    Clements, K.W.; Izan, H.Y.
  • The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future
    Cortese, A.D.
  • The social construction, challenge and transformation of a budgetary regime: the endogenization of welfare regulation by institutional entrepreneurs
    Covaleski, M.A.; Dirsmith, M.W.; Weiss, J.M.
  • Commitment to the environment and student support for ‘green’ campus initiatives
    Coy, A.E.; Farrell, A.K.; Gilson, K.P.; Davis, J.L.; Le, B.
  • Social reports in Italian universities: disclosures and preparers’ perspective
    Del Sordo, C.; Farneti, F.; Guthrie, J.; Pazzi, S.; Siboni, B.
  • The quality of sustainability reports and impression management
    Diouf, D.; Boiral, O.
  • The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concept, evidence and implications
    Donaldson, T.; Preston, L.E.
  • Sustainability assessment of the service operations at seven higher education institutions in Brazil
    Drahein, A.D.; De Lima, E.P.; Da Costa, S.E.G.
  • Towards a more systematic study of standalone corporate social and environmental: an exploratory pilot study of UK reporting
    Erusalimsky, A.; Gray, R.; Spence, C.
  • Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: why they report
    Farneti, F.; Guthrie, J.
  • Reputation indicators in rankings of higher education institutions
    Federkeil, G.
  • A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory
    Fernando, S.; Lawrence, S.
  • Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in higher education
    Ferrero-Ferrero, I.; Fernández-Izquierdo, M.Á.; Muñoz-Torres, M.J.; Bellés-Colomer, L.
  • How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation
    Finkelstein, S.; Boyd, B.K.
  • Stakeholders satisfaction and sustainable success
    Fonseca, L.; Ramos, A.; Rosa, Á.L.; Braga, A.C.; Sampaio, P.
  • Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation: a study of Italian securities analysts
    Gabbioneta, C.; Ravasi, D.; Mazzola, P.
  • Sustainability reporting by Australian universities
    Gamage, P.; Sciulli, N.
  • Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the value relevance of annual reports for listed banks in Kenya
    Gitahi, J.; Nasieku, T.; Memba, F.
  • Corporate governance and CSR nexus
    Harjoto, M.A.; Jo, H.
  • Rankings and the global reputation race
    Hazelkorn, E.
  • Exploring brand identity, meaning, image, and reputation (BIMIR) in higher education: a special section
    Hemsley-Brown, J.; Melewar, T.C.; Nguyen, B.; Wilson, E.J.
  • Corporate social responsibility: the link between sustainability disclosure and sustainability performance
    Herbohn, K.; Walker, J.; Loo, H.Y.M.
  • Sustainability reporting among Ghanaian universities
    Hinson, R.; Gyabea, A.; Ibrahim, M.
  • Embedding sustainability in higher education through interaction with lecturers: case studies from three European technical universities
    Holmberg, J.; Svanström, M.; Peet, D.J.; Mulder, K.; Ferrer-Balas, D.; Segalàs, J.
  • Strategic management accounting and the strategising mindset in an English higher education institutional context
    Hutaibat, K.; von Alberti‐Alhtaybat, L.; Al‐Htaybat, K.
  • Understanding the process of greening of Brazilian business schools
    Jabbour, C.J.C.; Sarkis, J.; Jabbour, ABLdS.; Govindan, K.
  • Corporate social and environmental accounting information reporting practices in Swaziland
    Kabir, H.; Akinnusi, D.M.
  • Students promoting economic development and environmental sustainability: an analysis of the impact of involvement in a community-based research and service-learning program
    Keen, C.; Baldwin, E.
  • A case study on the green campus operating system-focused on the green campus support institutions of the United States and Harvard university
    Kim, D.H.; Lee, H.; Jeon, K.E.; Kim, S.Y.
  • Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk
    Kim, Y.; Li, H.; Li, S.
  • The state of sustainability reporting in universities
    Lozano, R.
  • University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators
    Lukman, R.; Krajnc, D.; Glavič, P.
  • University rankings and social science
    Marginson, S.
  • Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts
    Mitchell, R.K.; Agle, B.R.; Wood, D.J.
  • Budgeting for legitimacy: the case of an Australian university
    Moll, J.; Hoque, Z.
  • Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: the nature of managerial capture
    O’Dwyer, B.
  • Budgetary change at a university: a narrative inquiry
    Ozdil, E.; Hoque, Z.
  • Accounting as an engine for the re‐creation of strategy at a university
    Ozdil, E.; Hoque, Z.
  • University corporatisation: driving redefinition
    Parker, L.
  • Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory
    Patten, D.M.
  • Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance
    Petrenko, O.V.; Aime, F.; Ridge, J.; Hill, A.
  • Assessing the impact of university reputation on stakeholder intentions
    Ressler, J.; Abratt, R.
  • Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory
    Roberts, R.W.
  • Assessing sustainability reports of US universities
    Sassen, R.; Azizi, L.
  • Researching management accounting practice: the role of case study methods
    Scapens, R.W.
  • Sustainability in higher education’s annual reports
    Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M.M.; Ossmann, S.F.
  • An alternative university sustainability rating framework with a structured criteria tree
    Shi, H.; Lai, E.
  • The signaling effect of corporate social responsibility in emerging economies
    Su, W.; Peng, M.W.; Tan, W.; Cheung, Y.L.
  • University stakeholder management and university social responsibility
    Tetrevova, L.; Sabolová, V.
  • Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence
    Toms, J.S.
  • Mission diversity and reputation in higher education
    Van Vught, F.
  • Sustainable university: what can be the matter?
    Velazquez, L.; Munguia, N.; Platt, A.; Taddei, J.
  • Reputation beyond the rankings: a conceptual framework for business school research
    Vidaver-Cohen, D.
  • Stakeholder mismatching: a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance
    Wood, D.J.; Jones, R.E.
  • A critical assessment of the higher education for sustainable development from students' perspectives – a Chinese study
    Yuan, X.; Zuo, J.
  • Green universities in China – what matters?
    Yuan, X.; Zuo, J.; Huisingh, D.
  • CSR initiatives as market signals: a review and research agenda
    Zerbini, F.
  • More than 17,000 jobs lost at Australian universities during Covid pandemic
    Zhou, N.
  • Standalone CSR reporting by US, retail companies
    Patten, D.M.; Zhao, N.
  • University impact rankings 2019