Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Bovens (2007)
New Forms of Accountability and EU-GovernanceComparative European Politics, 5
Y. Gendron, D. Cooper, B. Townley (2001)
In the name of accountability ‐State auditing, independence and new public managementAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14
(2008)
Innstilling fra Kontroll – og Konstitusjonskomiteen om Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av behandlingen og oppfølgingen av Vik-brevet i ommunal- og regionaldepartementet (Terra-saken)
V. Ystad (2009)
Når embetsverket styrerBergens Tidende
W. Funnell, Margo Wade (2012)
Negotiating the credibility of performance auditingCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 23
A. Sinclair (1995)
The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discoursesAccounting Organizations and Society, 20
(1995)
The new public management in the 1980s: the variation on a theme
K. Jeppesen, Thomas Carrington, B. Catasús, Åge Johnsen, K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, Jarmo Vakkuri (2017)
The Strategic Options of Supreme Audit Institutions: The Case of Four Nordic CountriesWiley-Blackwell: Financial Accountability & Management in Governments
D. Mayston (1993)
Principals, Agents and the Economics of Accountability in the New Public SectorAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6
C. Perrow (1975)
Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay
(2017)
Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av arkivering og åpenhet i statlig forvaltning
L. Justesen, Peter Skærbæk (2010)
Performance Auditing and the Narrating of a New Auditee IdentityMicroeconomics: Search; Learning; Information Costs & Specific Knowledge; Expectation & Speculation eJournal
(2016)
Ny bok: Kosmos ledelse kan ha svekket Riksrevisjonen i viktige drakamper
R. Mulgan (2000)
'Accountability': an ever-expanding concept?Public Administration, 78
(2012)
Norges OECD-ambassadør Tore Eriksen: – kjente ikke kriteriene
J. Shaoul, A. Stafford, Pamela Stapleton (2012)
Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnershipsCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 23
K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, Åge Johnsen (2011)
Auditors’ understanding of evidence: A performance audit of an urban development programmeEvaluation, 17
K. Reichborn-Kjennerud (2014)
Performance audit and the importance of the public debateEvaluation, 20
A. Peräkylä, J. Ruusuvuori (2011)
Analyzing talk and text
(2003)
Innstilling fra Kontroll – og Konstitusjonskomiteen om rapport til Stortinget fra Utvalget til å Utrede
(2002)
Innstilling fra Kontroll – og Konstitusjonskomiteen om Riksrevisjonens kontroll med statsrådens (departementets) forvaltning, statens interesser i selskaper, Banker mv. for 2000
R. Almquist, G. Grossi, G. Helden, Christoph Reichard (2013)
Public sector governance and accountabilityCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 24
Sandra Tillema, T. Bogt (2010)
Performance auditing: Improving the quality of political and democratic processes?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21
M. Bovens (2007)
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual FrameworkWiley-Blackwell: European Law Journal
(2012)
Tidligere UDI-direktør Ida Børresen:–skrint utbyttte
Linda Deleon (1998)
Accountability In A ‘Reinvented’ GovernmentPublic Administration, 76
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32
Kristin Kjennerud (2013)
POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND PERFORMANCE AUDIT: THE CASE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL IN NORWAYPublic Administration, 91
P. Barberis (1998)
The New Public Management And A New AccountabilityPublic Administration, 76
R. Mulgan (2020)
Public sector reform in New Zealand - issues of public accountabilityPublic Administration Quarterly, 32
Francis Leazes (1997)
Public AccountabilityAdministration & Society, 29
(2003)
Innstilling fra Kontroll – og Konstitusjonskomiteen om rapport til Stortinget fra Utvalget til å UtredeStortingets Kontrollfunksjon. Stortingets Kontroll med Regjering og Forvaltning
M. Messner (2009)
The Limits of AccountabilityAccounting Organizations and Society, 34
(2012)
Riksrevisjonen på ville veier
N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (2005)
Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.
Bookauthor (1940)
Research MethodsTeachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 42
(2012)
Om å vokte Riksrevisjonen?
Harry Evans (1999)
Parliament and Extra‐Parliamentary Accountability InstitutionsAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 58
N. Mcgarvey (2001)
Accountability in Public Administration: A Multi-Perspective Framework of AnalysisPublic Policy and Administration, 16
W. Funnell (2003)
Enduring fundamentals: constitutional accountability and auditors-general in the reluctant stateCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 14
K. Reichborn-Kjennerud, Åge Johnsen (2018)
Performance Audits and Supreme Audit Institutions’ Impact on Public Administration: The Case of the Office of the Auditor General in NorwayAdministration & Society, 50
J. Guthrie, L. Parker (1999)
A Quarter of a Century of Performance Auditing in the Australian Federal Public Sector: A Malleable MasqueAbacus, 35
R. Andeweg (2000)
Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministersEuropean Journal of Political Research, 37
(2012)
Hemmelighold regjeringsnotater: De rød-grønne holder mer hemmelig
(2012)
Riksrevisjonen–vaktbikkje uten bånd?
John Roberts (2009)
No-one is perfect: the limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountabilityAccounting Organizations and Society, 34
Peter Smith (1992)
Negative Political Feedback: An Examination of the Problem of Modelling Political Responses in Public Sector Effectiveness AuditingAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5
S. Scarparo (2008)
Accountability in the UK devolved parliament and assemblies
R. Hodges (2012)
Joined‐Up Government and the Challenges to Accounting and Accountability ResearchersPublic Economics: Miscellaneous Issues eJournal
S. Berg (2006)
Snowball Sampling—I
M. Power (1994)
The Audit Explosion
(2012)
Tidligere utviklingsminister Erik Solheim (SV): – opptatt av småfeil
W. Funnell (2011)
Keeping secrets? Or what government performance auditors might not need to knowCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 22
(2009)
Innstilling fra Kontroll – og Konstitusjonskomiteen om Riksrevisjonens rapport om den årlige revisjon og kontroll for budsjettåret 2008
K. Reichborn-Kjennerud (2015)
Resistance to Control—Norwegian Ministries’ and Agencies’ Reactions to Performance AuditPublic Organization Review, 15
S. Smyth, D. Whitfield (2017)
Maintaining market principles: Government auditors, PPP equity sales and hegemonyAccounting Forum, 41
W. Funnell (2015)
Performance Auditing and Adjudicating Political DisputesCorporate Finance: Governance
(2012)
Tidligere forsvarssjef Sverre Diesen: – lite kvalifisert revisjon
Levi Grseth-Nesbakk, Frode Kjærland (2016)
Precarious Investments and Blame Gaming – Adverse Effects and the Inherent Danger of SimplificationWiley-Blackwell: Financial Accountability & Management in Governments
M. Bovens, Thomas Schillemans, P. Hart (2008)
Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment ToolPublic Administration, 86
F. Iyoha, D. Oyerinde (2010)
Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on NigeriaCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 21
(2009)
Kosmos pitbull
Vaughan Radcliffe (2008)
Public secrecy in auditing: What government auditors cannot knowCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 19
Van Helden, R. Almquist, G. Grossi, Christoph Reichard (2013)
Editorial Public Sector Governance and AccountabilityCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 24
This study aims to unravel characteristics of performance audit (PA) reports and official responses to them, associated critiques and alleged unintended consequences.Design/methodology/approachThis archival research study has centered on PA reports and associated newspaper articles, books and reports, identified through database searches and the snowball approach. Mixed analysis approaches included content analysis, discourse analysis and informal analysis.FindingsAuditees tend to oppose perceived unfair or inappropriate methods and process dimensions of the PAs more than the amount of criticism they face. The blame avoidance concept is therefore more accurate than the blame gaming one. The total amount of critical wording could still matter, as the media may disproportionally enlarge the significance of PA reports. Disclosure and interpretation of PA reports, and the associated media debates, could yield diametrical repercussions.Research limitations/implicationsThe research results may lack generalizability. Future studies could extend this work by covering a longer time period or being comparative in nature.Practical implicationsTo achieve (more) effective and legitimate PAs, it is necessary to adequately understand, balance and display accountability perceptions of those held accountable. The choice of auditing methods and incorporation of auditees’ views seem paramount to the way auditees respond to PAs and ought therefore to be carefully selected, alongside specific wording.Originality/valueJuxtaposition of critical wording with other characteristics of PA reports and how ministries respond to them gives insight into key sources of criticism and debate circumstancing accountability.
Pacific Accounting Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 14, 2018
Keywords: Media; Accountability; Auditor general; Central government; Diametrical effects; Performance auditing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.