Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/decisional-and-interactional-fairness-supervisor-influence-on-merit-QyQYdDUuZt
References (64)
-
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1995)
Evaluating model fit. -
R. Vermunt, W. Kloot, J. Meer (1993)
The effect of procedural and interactional criteria on procedural fairness judgmentsSocial Justice Research, 6
-
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
-
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
-
K. Jöreskog, D. Sörbom (1997)
Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide -
W. Giles, K. Mossholder (1990)
Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisalJournal of Applied Psychology, 75
-
Robert Heneman, C. Hippel (1997)
The assessment of job performance: Focusing attention on context, process, and group issues -
S. Crampton, J. Wagner (1994)
Percept-Percept Inflation in Microorganizational Research: An Investigation of Prevalence and EffectJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
-
D. Bandalos (1993)
Factors Influencing Cross-Validation of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models.Multivariate behavioral research, 28 3
-
J. Colquitt (2001)
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 3
-
B. Byrne, R. Shavelson, B. Muthén (1989)
Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance.Psychological Bulletin, 105
-
B. Nathan, Allan Mohrman, J. Milliman (1991)
Interpersonal Relations as a Context For the Effects of Appraisal Interviews on Performance and Satisfaction: A Longitudinal StudyAcademy of Management Journal, 34
-
R. Cropanzano, Zinta Byrne, D. Bobocel, D. Rupp (2001)
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58
-
M. Miceli (1993)
Justice and pay system satisfaction. -
G. Hofstede (1980)
Culture and OrganizationsInternational Studies of Management and Organization, 10
-
S. Markham (1988)
Pay-for-performance dilemma revisited: Empirical example of the importance of group effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73
-
Jerald Greenberg (1986)
Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance EvaluationsJournal of Applied Psychology, 71
-
C. Beugré (1998)
Managing fairness in organizations -
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1988)
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACHPsychological Bulletin, 103
-
R. Schuler, Nikolai Rogovsky (1998)
Understanding Compensation Practice Variations Across Firms: The Impact of National CultureJournal of International Business Studies, 29
-
Michael Mullen (1995)
Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National ResearchJournal of International Business Studies, 26
-
Simon Lam, J. Schaubroeck, S. Aryee (2002)
Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: a cross‐national studyJournal of Organizational Behavior, 23
-
Murphy K.J.
10.1037/14047-033 -
R. Folger, M. Konovsky (1989)
Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
-
Don Eskew, Robert Heneman, M. Fisher (1996)
A Survey of Merit Pay Plan Effectiveness: End of the Line for Merit Pay or Hope for Improvement?, 19
-
Robert Heneman, David Greenberger, S. Strasser (1988)
The Relationship between Pay-for-Performance Perceptions and Pay Satisfaction.Personnel Psychology, 41
-
Hazuki Sugawara, R. Maccallum (1993)
Effect of Estimation Method on Incremental Fit Indexes for Covariance Structure ModelsApplied Psychological Measurement, 17
-
D. Turban, Thomas Keon (1993)
Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspectiveJournal of Applied Psychology, 78
-
J. Brockner, B. Wiesenfeld (1996)
An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.Psychological bulletin, 120 2
-
10.1016/0149-2063(94)90001-9
-
Gina Medsker, L. Williams, P. Holahan (1994)
A Review of Current Practices for Evaluating Causal Models in Organizational Behavior and Human Resources Management ResearchJournal of Management, 20
-
M. Miceli, Paul Mulvey (2000)
Consequences of Satisfaction with Pay Systems: Two Field StudiesIndustrial Relations, 39
-
K. Bollen, J. Long (1993)
Testing Structural Equation Models -
T. Du, J. Tanaka (1995)
Incremental Fit Index Changes for Nested Structural Equation Models.Multivariate behavioral research, 30 3
-
K. Murphy, J. Cleveland (1991)
Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. -
10.2307/256513
-
A. Cobb, Michael Vest, F. Hills (1997)
Who Delivers Justice? Source Perceptions of Procedural Fairness1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27
-
R. Maccallum, M. Roznowski, Corinne Mar, J. Reith (1994)
Alternative Strategies for Cross-Validation of Covariance Structure Models.Multivariate behavioral research, 29 1
-
Robert Heneman (1992)
Merit Pay: Linking Pay Increases to Performance Ratings -
G. Leventhal (1980)
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory -
Vandra Huber, P. Seybolt, Kathleen Venemon (1992)
The Relationship Between Individual Inputs, Perceptions, and Multidimensional Pay SatisfactionJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 22
-
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
-
M. Greller, C. Parsons (1995)
Contingent Pay Systems and Job Performance FeedbackGroup & Organization Management, 20
-
J. Thibaut, L. Walker (1976)
Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis -
M. Sturman, J. Short (2000)
LUMP‐SUM BONUS SATISFACTION: TESTING THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF A NEW PAY SATISFACTION DIMENSIONPersonnel Psychology, 53
-
G. Hofstede, G. Hofstede, M. Minkov (1991)
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind -
10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00877.x
-
C. Lowery, M. Petty, James Thompson (1996)
Assessing the Merit of Merit Pay: Employee Reactions to Performance-Based Pay, 19
-
E. Kelloway (1995)
Structural equation modelling in perspective.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16
-
G. Maruyama (1997)
Basics of structural equation modeling -
Jerald Greenberg (1993)
The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. -
M. Miceli, Iljae Jung, J. Near, David Greenberger (1991)
Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76
-
J. Colquitt, D. Conlon, M. Wesson, C. Porter, K. Ng (2001)
Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 3
-
L. Dyer, Roland Thériault (1976)
The Determinants of Pay Satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61
-
Gerald Gabris, D. Ihrke (2000)
Improving Employee Acceptance Toward Performance Appraisal and Merit Pay SystemsReview of Public Personnel Administration, 20
-
J. Steenkamp, H. Baumgartner (1998)
Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 25
-
Robert Bretz, T. Judge (1994)
The Role of Human Resource Systems in Job Applicant Decision ProcessesJournal of Management, 20
-
W. Giles, H. Findley, H. Feild (1997)
Procedural fairness in performance appraisal: Beyond the review sessionJournal of Business and Psychology, 11
-
B. Thompson, L. Daniel (1996)
Factor Analytic Evidence for the Construct Validity of Scores: A Historical Overview and Some GuidelinesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 56
-
T. Judge, G. Ferris (1993)
Social Context of Performance Evaluation DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 36
-
R. Folger, R. Cropanzano (2001)
Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. -
Gordon Cheung, Roger Rensvold (1999)
Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New MethodJournal of Management, 25
-
H. Heneman, D. Schwab (1985)
Pay satisfaction: its multidimensional nature and measurement.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie, 20 1
-
H. Marsh, J. Balla, K. Hau (1996)
An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties.
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2003 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1536-5433
- DOI
- 10.1108/15365430380000523
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Employee dissatisfaction with merit pay is a long‐standing problem. This study introduces four explanatory constructs, based on decisional and interactional fairness notions, that describe how supervisors implement merit pay and predict merit pay satisfaction. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses, applied to a sample of American employees (N = 415) and a sample of Venezuelan employees (N = 239), show that the five constructs introduced here are distinct from each other and that their measures generalize across countries (cultures and languages).
Journal
Management Research The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2003
Keywords: Merit pay; Fairness; Supervisor; Performance; Venezuela; USA