Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Cultural landscapes: exploring local people's understanding of cultural practices as “heritage”

Cultural landscapes: exploring local people's understanding of cultural practices as “heritage” A vital testimony of human presence landscape is recognised and protected by international, national and local documents as an identity resource and one of the factors that contribute to the identity building processes (UNESCO, 1994; European Landscape Convention, 2000). The validation of landscape as cultural heritage presents not only new challenges but also opportunities for the heritage sector. In fact, a landscape plays a dual role: as part of the cultural heritage, which has to be preserved for its values, and as a “living” site, where individuals and groups live and work. This implies that the acknowledgement of its cultural significance should not be exclusively determined on the basis of discipline-driven frameworks and benchmarks but should rather be the result of a shared awareness within local communities.Design/methodology/approachThrough the analysis of the vineyard landscape of Langhe-Roero and Monferrato (Italy), the author discusses how the selection of a World Heritage site driven by “outstanding universal values” risks presenting a top-down approach to heritage processes.FindingsIn this article, the author explores how people living in this cultural landscape articulate their understandings of heritage values, and she addresses issues concerning their participation in decision-making processes, questioning whose values and meanings do the “outstanding universal value” legitimise or not.Originality/valueWhat the author argues is that the World Heritage listing's focus on extraordinary values risks constructing heritage around a consensus that privileges only some actors, whose voices and stories enliven the prestige of the wine production of this cultural landscape, omitting other values, memories and practices from the identity and meaning making processes. Does the identification and representation processes validated through World Heritage status capture how a landscape is understood by individuals and groups living within it? If not, how do these differences affect people's engagement? A further point of discussion is whether individuals and groups want to be engaged in decision-making processes and on which terms. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development Emerald Publishing

Cultural landscapes: exploring local people's understanding of cultural practices as “heritage”

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/cultural-landscapes-exploring-local-people-s-understanding-of-cultural-imwRwrYQPq
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2044-1266
DOI
10.1108/jchmsd-03-2020-0042
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

A vital testimony of human presence landscape is recognised and protected by international, national and local documents as an identity resource and one of the factors that contribute to the identity building processes (UNESCO, 1994; European Landscape Convention, 2000). The validation of landscape as cultural heritage presents not only new challenges but also opportunities for the heritage sector. In fact, a landscape plays a dual role: as part of the cultural heritage, which has to be preserved for its values, and as a “living” site, where individuals and groups live and work. This implies that the acknowledgement of its cultural significance should not be exclusively determined on the basis of discipline-driven frameworks and benchmarks but should rather be the result of a shared awareness within local communities.Design/methodology/approachThrough the analysis of the vineyard landscape of Langhe-Roero and Monferrato (Italy), the author discusses how the selection of a World Heritage site driven by “outstanding universal values” risks presenting a top-down approach to heritage processes.FindingsIn this article, the author explores how people living in this cultural landscape articulate their understandings of heritage values, and she addresses issues concerning their participation in decision-making processes, questioning whose values and meanings do the “outstanding universal value” legitimise or not.Originality/valueWhat the author argues is that the World Heritage listing's focus on extraordinary values risks constructing heritage around a consensus that privileges only some actors, whose voices and stories enliven the prestige of the wine production of this cultural landscape, omitting other values, memories and practices from the identity and meaning making processes. Does the identification and representation processes validated through World Heritage status capture how a landscape is understood by individuals and groups living within it? If not, how do these differences affect people's engagement? A further point of discussion is whether individuals and groups want to be engaged in decision-making processes and on which terms.

Journal

Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 14, 2021

Keywords: World heritage; Cultural landscape; Everyday practices; Everyday participation; Local communities

References

  • Searching for belonging – an analytical framework
    Antonsich, M.
  • A ladder of citizen participation
    Arnstein, S.R.
  • European landscape convention
    Council of Europe
  • Framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society
    Council of Europe
  • Processes of place attachment: an interactional framework
    Cross, J.E.
  • Unescocidio
    D'Eramo, M.
  • Ecomuseums and the representation of place
    Davis, P.
  • The mundane and insignificant, the ordinary and the extraordinary: understanding everyday participation and theories of everyday life
    Ebrey, J.
  • Heritage as knowledge: capital or culture?
    Graham, B.
  • Advisory body evaluation
  • ‘I just don't ever use that world’: investigating stakeholders' understanding of heritage
    Kryder-Reid, E.; Foutz, J.W.; Wood, E.; Zimmermann, L.J.
  • Politics of place and resistance: the case of Northern Ireland
    Kuusisto, A.K.
  • A review of the global Strategy for a balanced, representative and credible world heritage list 1994-2004
    Labadi, S.
  • Selecting heritage: the interplay of art, politics and identity
    Lixinski, L.
  • Heritage, memory and identity
    McDowell, S.; Graham, B.J.; Howard, P.
  • Everyday participation and cultural value
    Miles, A.; Gibson, L.
  • World heritage cultural landscapes. A handbook of conservation and management
    Mitchell, N.; Rössler, M.; Tricaud, P.M.
  • Remixing as praxis. Arnstein's ladder through the grassroots preservationist's lens
    Roberts, A.; Kelly, G.
  • Local history and oral history
    Samuel, R.
  • Report of the expert meeting on the ‘global strategy' and thematic studies for a representative world heritage list
  • Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention
  • Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage
  • UNESCO world heritage ListThe vineyard landscape of Langhe-Roero and Monferrato. Executive summary
  • Ethics and intangible cultural heritage. Decision of the intergovernmental committee
  • Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention
  • The necessity of taking a community approach in a historical cultural landscape conservation: a case of the Jianan Irrigation System in Taiwan
    Wang, C.
  • Multiple interfaces of the European landscape convention
    Jones, M.; Howard, P.; Olwig, K.R.; Primdahl, J.; Sarlöv Herlin, I.
  • Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible world heritage list