Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Micah Officer (2007)
The Price of Corporate Liquidity: Acquisition Discounts for Unlisted TargetsUSC Finance & Business Economics Working Papers
E. Fama, K. French (1993)
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 33
E. Fama, K. French (1992)
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsJournal of Finance, 47
G. Nartea, B. Ward, H. Djajadikerta (2009)
Size, BM, and momentum effects and the robustness of the Fama-French three-factor model: Evidence from New ZealandInternational Journal of Managerial Finance, 5
G. Boyle, R. Meade (2008)
Intra-country regulation of share markets: does one size fit all?European Journal of Law and Economics, 25
M. Brennan, Tarun Chordia, A. Subrahmanyam (1998)
Alternative factor specifications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 49
E. Fama, James MacBeth (1973)
Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical TestsJournal of Political Economy, 81
Andrew Ang, Assaf Shtauber, Paul Tetlock (2013)
Asset Pricing in the Dark: The Cross Section of OTC StocksS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
Y. Amihud, H. Mendelson (1986)
Asset pricing and the bid-ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 17
S. Trethewey, T. Crack (2009)
Price Momentum in the New Zealand Stock Market: A Proper Accounting for Transactions Costs and RiskBehavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal
J. Campbell (2000)
Asset Pricing at the MillenniumCapital Markets eJournal
Y. Amihud, Joonki Noh (2018)
Illiquidity and Stock Returns II: Cross-Section and Time-Series EffectsCapital Markets: Asset Pricing & Valuation eJournal
John Pinfold, W. Wilson, Qiuli Li (2001)
Book-to-market and size as determinants of returns in small illiquid markets: the New Zealand caseFinancial Services Review, 10
Simon Gervais, Ron Kaniel, Dan Mingelgrin (2001)
The High Volume Return PremiumJournal of Finance, 56
Narasimhan Jegadeesh, S. Titman (1993)
Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market EfficiencyJournal of Finance, 48
R. Banz (1981)
The relationship between return and market value of common stocksJournal of Financial Economics, 9
Barr Rosenberg., K. Reid, Ronald Lanstein (1985)
Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency, 11
Hung Kot (2007)
Return-Based Investment Strategies in the New Zealand Stock Market: Momentum WinsInternational Finance
Narasimhan Jegadeesh (1990)
Evidence of Predictable Behavior of Security ReturnsJournal of Finance, 45
L. Moor, P. Sercu (2013)
The Smallest Firm Effect: An International StudyJournal of International Money and Finance, 32
(1990)
Fads, Martingales, and Market Efficiency
Ben Marshall, M. Young (2005)
Liquidity and Stock Returns: A New Zealand Perspective
Paul Bryant, Venkat Eleswarapu (1997)
Cross-Sectional Determinants of New Zealand Share Market ReturnsERN: Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics (Topic)
C. Gan, Minsoo Lee, A. Hwa, Jun Zhang (2005)
Revisiting Share Market Efficiency: Evidence from the New Zealand Australia, US and Japan Stock IndicesAmerican Journal of Applied Sciences, 2
Atul Gupta, Lalatendu Misra (2010)
Listing Effects and the Private Company Discount in Bank Acquisitions
Philip Stork (2008)
Momentum Effects in the Largest Australian and New Zealand SharesBehavioral & Experimental Finance
L. Moor, P. Sercu (2011)
The Smallest Stocks are Not Just Smaller: US and International Evidence
Purpose – This paper aims to examine whether the cross-sectional return patterns in New Zealand’s main stock market (NZSX) are also present in the alternative (NZAX) and over-the-counter (Unlisted) markets. Design/methodology/approach – Cross-sectional regressions of monthly stock returns on well-known pricing factors including firm size, book-to-market (B/M) ratio, liquidity and past returns were run. The NZSX sample commenced in 1988 and continued through to 2011, while data are available for the Unlisted and NZAX markets from 2004 to 2011. Findings – The pricing factors that are important in explaining returns in major international markets also influence returns on the NZSX. However, only B/M is consistently priced across all New Zealand stock exchanges, including the alternative NZAX and Unlisted markets. There is evidence of reversal in NZAX stocks, but liquidity effects are not consistent or pervasive in either market. Practical implications – With B/M being the only consistently priced variable across all markets, investors in the NZAX and in particular Unlisted may be concerned with other risk factors. For example, the risks associated with differing levels of investor protection, corporate governance and disclosure may be of more concern to investors than pricing factors such as size, liquidity and past returns in these alternative trading platforms. Originality/value – The paper examines cross-sectional return patterns of the NZAX and Unlisted stocks and is the first paper to jointly test the explanatory power of size, B/M, past returns and liquidity factors for NZSX stocks.
Pacific Accounting Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.