Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/comparison-of-optimization-techniques-for-electromagnetic-applications-l8ANnyMTvM
References (7)
-
C. Parker, J. Sykulski, S. Taylor, C. Biddlecombe (1996)
Parametric environment for EM computer aided designIEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 32
-
R. Fletcher (1988)
Practical Methods of Optimization -
R. Fletcher (1987)
Practical methods of optimization; (2nd ed.) -
Y. Cheng, J. Sykulski (1996)
Automated design and optimization of electromechanical actuatorsInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling-electronic Networks Devices and Fields, 9
-
T. Crummey, R. Farshadnia, P. Fleming, A. Grace, S. Hancock (1991)
An optimization toolbox for MATLAB -
Y.B. Cheng (1996)
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1204(199601)9:1/2<59::AID-JNM227>3.3.CO;2-WInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 9
-
P. Neittaanmäki, R. Rudnicki, A. Savini (1996)
Inverse Problems and Optimal Design in Electricity and Magnetism
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1998 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0332-1649
- DOI
- 10.1108/03321649810369375
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The paper presents a comparison of performance of a number of selected optimization procedures when applied to solving electromagnetic field problems. The optimization techniques assessed encompass simulated annealing and genetic algorithms, as well as deterministic methods, including the Levenberg‐Marquardt procedure. The comparison is performed using a number of test functions followed by a study of two simple configurations relevant to problems encountered in electromagnetics.
Journal
COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1998
Keywords: Computer aided design (CAD); Electromagnetics; Optimization