Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kouider Mokhtari, C. Reichard, A. Gardner (2009)
The Impact of Internet and Television Use on the Reading Habits and Practices of College StudentsJournal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52
Kolb S.M. (2015)
The materials-centred approach to public library collection development: a defenseLibrary Philosophy and Practice, 3
A. Onwuegbuzie (2004)
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has ComeEducational Researcher, 33
H. Boeije (2002)
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative InterviewsQuality and Quantity, 36
M. Smith (2000)
The Real-World Reading Practices of AdultsJournal of Literacy Research, 32
Margaret Merga (2017)
Do Males Really Prefer Non-Fiction, and Why Does It Matter?.English in Australia, 52
Sharon Kolb (2012)
Grounded theory and the constant comparative method : valid research strategies for educatorsJournal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 3
C. Ross (1999)
Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasureInf. Process. Manag., 35
Barbara Moss, J. Hendershot (2002)
Exploring Sixth Graders' Selection of Nonfiction Trade Books.The Reading Teacher, 56
Margaret Merga (2017)
Meeting the Needs of Avid Book Readers: Access, Space, Concentration Support and Barrier MitigationJournal of Library Administration, 57
R. Mar, K. Oatley, Jordan Peterson (2009)
Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes, 34
Abby Alpert (2006)
Incorporating Nonfiction into Readers’ Advisory ServicesReference and User Services Quarterly, 46
(2016)
Nonfiction collections in NSW public libraries
P. Dewan (2013)
Reading Matters in the Academic Library: Taking the Lead from Public LibrariansReference and User Services Quarterly, 52
Forum for World Literature Studies, 7
Vicki Clark (2017)
Mixed methods researchThe Journal of Positive Psychology, 12
B. Glaser (1965)
The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative AnalysisSocial Problems, 12
A. Mikkonen, P. Vakkari (2012)
Readers' search strategies for accessing books in public libraries
Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation
R. Mar, K. Oatley, Jacob Hirsh, J. Paz, Jordan Peterson (2006)
Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worldsJournal of Research in Personality, 40
S. Baker (1994)
Quality And Demand: The Basis For Fiction Collection AssessmentCollection Building, 13
T. Williams (2009)
A Framework for Nonfiction in the Elementary GradesLiteracy Research and Instruction, 48
Katrina Fong, J. Mullin, R. Mar (2013)
What You Read Matters: The Role of Fiction Genre in Predicting Interpersonal SensitivityPsychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7
Margaret Merga (2017)
What motivates avid readers to maintain a regular reading habit in adulthood?The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 40
S. Tepper (2000)
Fiction reading in America: Explaining the gender gapPoetics, 27
N. Schutte, J. Malouff (2007)
Dimensions of Reading Motivation: Development of an Adult Reading Motivation ScaleReading Psychology, 28
Richard Gerrig (1993)
Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading
C. Ross (2009)
Reader on Top: Public Libraries, Pleasure Reading, and Models of ReadingLibrary Trends, 57
This paper aims to provide insights into the characteristics of avid non-fiction book readers, exploring their typical demographic characteristics in relation to reading volume and frequency. It also investigates their comparative library usage in relation to avid fiction readers, as well as their motivation to read, and barriers to reading. Findings from the subset of self-identified avid non-fiction readers from the 2015 International Study of Avid Book Readers are interrogated to provide insights into this under-researched group.Design/methodology/approachThe authors have used a single-stage mixed-methods approach, using data from both qualitative and quantitative items in an international survey.FindingsThe quantitative data analysis of this study suggests that avid non-fiction book readers were more likely to be men and older than avid fiction readers, and that they also tended to read less frequently, though avid non-fiction readers tended to read a greater volume of books. Avid fiction readers reported greater library usage, and thus unsurprisingly were found to have a greater borrowing tendency than non-fiction readers. Our qualitative findings around reading motivation identified a range of recurrent themes. The authors also found three key barriers to reading: time, book access and concentration.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide unique insights into the characteristics, preferences and motivation of avid non-fiction readers, with the relationship between pleasure and the reading of non-fiction of particular interest.
Collection and Curation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 3, 2018
Keywords: Mixed-methods; Non-fiction; Borrower characteristics; Borrower motivation; Borrower preferences
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.