Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Mckinlay, K. Starkey (1998)
Managing Foucault: Foucault, Management and Organization Theory
D. Dokter, P. Holloway, Henri Seebohm (2011)
Dramatherapy and Destructiveness : Creating the Evidence Base, Playing with Thanatos
D. Cole, Paul Throssell (2008)
Epiphanies in action: teaching and learning in synchronous harmonyThe international journal of learning, 15
A. Sparkes (2002)
Fictional Representations: On Difference, Choice, and RiskSociology of Sport Journal, 19
C. Ellis, Arthur Bochner (1999)
Composing Ethnography: Alternative Forms of Qualitative WritingSocial Forces, 1
N. Denzin (2003)
Performance Ethnography: Critical Pedagogy and the Politics of Culture
A. Strauss (1995)
Identity, Biography, History, and Symbolic RepresentationsSocial Psychology Quarterly, 58
J. Saldaña (2011)
Ethnotheatre: Research from Page to Stage
R. Fardon, C. Geertz (1988)
Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author., 23
J. Law, J. Urry (2004)
Enacting the socialEconomy and Society, 33
C. Ellis (1997)
Evocative Autoethnography: Writing Emotionally about Our Lives
J. Moreno (1946)
Psychodrama, first volume.
David Tarbet, Michel Foucault, Alan Sheridan (1978)
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.Eighteenth-Century Studies, 11
Purpose – The Ethical Borgs are a fictional panel of a set of people who have the task of attending to the manner in which research “should” occur. The scenario is a series of “fictionalised encounters” between two researchers presenting their research proposals to the panel for approval. The purpose of this paper is to revisit and play out two researchers’ individual and collective experiences of gaining ethical clearance as emergent researchers. The tension of their place and status in academia drives their identity. Design/methodology/approach – This paper is presented in the form of a short play. The focus is on the manner in which the performance of the academic self as researcher can be impeded or assisted by the deliberations of the “Ethical Borgs”. These fictional encounters demonstrate the tension of being located in the in-between worlds of researchers in-waiting who need to negotiate their roles and whose ethical anxieties are critiqued through the lens of the “naive inquirer” the “too hard don’t touch inquirer” and the “medicalised” lens inquirer. Findings – The major themes examined in this paper address how the Ethical Borgs increasingly exercise power and have authority to authorise social inquiry. Originality/value – Questions that are also raised include what academic approval is required to inquire? How does a naive inquirer manoeuvre his or her way through institutionalised and bureaucratic procedures?
Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.